Research how LLMs could help to Linux developers and/or users
a project by anicka
Updated about 1 year ago. 8 hacker ♥️. 6 followers.

Description

Large language models like ChatGPT have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a variety of applications. However, their potential for enhancing the Linux development and user ecosystem remains largely unexplored. This project seeks to bridge that gap by researching practical applications of LLMs to improve workflows in areas such as backporting, packaging, log analysis, system migration, and more. By identifying patterns that LLMs can leverage, we aim to uncover new efficiencies and automation strategies that can benefit developers, maintainers, and end users alike.

Goals

  • Evaluate Existing LLM Capabilities: Research and document the current state of LLM usage in open-source and Linux development projects, noting successes and limitations.
  • Prototype Tools and Scripts: Develop proof-of-concept scripts or tools that leverage LLMs to perform specific tasks like automated log analysis, assisting with backporting patches, or generating packaging metadata.
  • Assess Performance and Reliability: Test the tools' effectiveness on real-world Linux data and analyze their accuracy, speed, and reliability.
  • Identify Best Use Cases: Pinpoint which tasks are most suitable for LLM support, distinguishing between high-impact and impractical applications.
  • Document Findings and Recommendations: Summarize results with clear documentation and suggest next steps for potential integration or further development.

Resources

  • Local LLM Implementations: Access to locally hosted LLMs such as LLaMA, GPT-J, or similar open-source models that can be run and fine-tuned on local hardware.
  • Computing Resources: Workstations or servers capable of running LLMs locally, equipped with sufficient GPU power for training and inference.
  • Sample Data: Logs, source code, patches, and packaging data from openSUSE or SUSE repositories for model training and testing.
  • Public LLMs for Benchmarking: Access to APIs from platforms like OpenAI or Hugging Face for comparative testing and performance assessment.
  • Existing NLP Tools: Libraries such as spaCy, Hugging Face Transformers, and PyTorch for building and interacting with local LLMs.
  • Technical Documentation: Tutorials and resources focused on setting up and optimizing local LLMs for tasks relevant to Linux development.
  • Collaboration: Engagement with community experts and teams experienced in AI and Linux for feedback and joint exploration.

Join this project

Looking for hackers with the skills:

ai

This project is part of:

Hack Week 24

Activity

  • about 1 year ago: PSuarezHernandez liked this project.
  • about 1 year ago: jiriwiesner liked this project.
  • about 1 year ago: anicka added keyword "ai" to this project.
  • about 1 year ago: moio liked this project.
  • about 1 year ago: livdywan liked this project.
  • about 1 year ago: mwilck liked this project.
  • about 1 year ago: bfilho liked this project.
  • about 1 year ago: vlefebvre liked this project.
  • about 1 year ago: wfrisch liked this project.
  • about 1 year ago: anicka started this project.
  • about 1 year ago: anicka originated this project.


    • Comments

    • wfrisch
      about 1 year ago by wfrisch | Reply

      If someone could recreate Google's Project Naptime, or at least something similar to it, that would be very interesting:

      Two key features:

      • Tool use in general
      • Tool-assisted verification of LLM results

    • jiriwiesner
      about 1 year ago by jiriwiesner | Reply

      I would like to ask an LLM instance about the inner workings on the Linux kernel code. It is a common task of mine to look for a bug in a subsystem or a layer that can easily have tens of thousands of lines of code (e.g. bsc 1216813). I know having an understanding of the Linux code is what we do as developers but my understanding and knowledge is always limited because I simply do not have the time to read all of the code possibly involved in an issue. If the LLM was trained to process the source code of a specific version of Linux a developer could then ask involved questions about the code using the terms found in the code base. It should basically be something that allows a developer find the interesting parts of the code better than when using just grep.

      • anicka
        about 1 year ago by anicka | Reply

        Actually, it looks like that off-the-shelf ChatGPT 4 can be already quite helpful in such tasks.

        But training something like code llama on our kernels is something I indeed want to look into next time because if there is any way how to leverage LLMs in our bugfixing or backporting, this is it.

    Similar Projects

    Try out Neovim Plugins supporting AI Providers by enavarro_suse

    Description

    Experiment with several Neovim plugins that integrate AI model providers such as Gemini and Ollama.

    Goals

    Evaluate how these plugins enhance the development workflow, how they differ in capabilities, and how smoothly they integrate into Neovim for day-to-day coding tasks.

    Resources

    issuefs: FUSE filesystem representing issues (e.g. JIRA) for the use with AI agents code-assistants by llansky3

    Description

    Creating a FUSE filesystem (issuefs) that mounts issues from various ticketing systems (Github, Jira, Bugzilla, Redmine) as files to your local file system.

    And why this is good idea?

    • User can use favorite command line tools to view and search the tickets from various sources
    • User can use AI agents capabilities from your favorite IDE or cli to ask question about the issues, project or functionality while providing relevant tickets as context without extra work.
    • User can use it during development of the new features when you let the AI agent to jump start the solution. The issuefs will give the AI agent the context (AI agents just read few more files) about the bug or requested features. No need for copying and pasting issues to user prompt or by using extra MCP tools to access the issues. These you can still do but this approach is on purpose different.

    Goals

    1. Add Github issue support
    2. Proof the concept/approach by apply the approach on itself using Github issues for tracking and development of new features
    3. Add support for Bugzilla and Redmine using this approach in the process of doing it. Record a video of it.
    4. Clean-up and test the implementation and create some documentation
    5. Create a blog post about this approach

    Resources

    There is a prototype implementation here. This currently sort of works with JIRA only.

    "what is it" file and directory analysis via MCP and local LLM, for console and KDE by rsimai

    Description

    Users sometimes wonder what files or directories they find on their local PC are good for. If they can't determine from the filename or metadata, there should an easy way to quickly analyze the content and at least guess the meaning. An LLM could help with that, through the use of a filesystem MCP and to-text-converters for typical file types. Ideally this is integrated into the desktop environment but works as well from a console. All data is processed locally or "on premise", no artifacts remain or leave the system.

    Goals

    • The user can run a command from the console, to check on a file or directory
    • The filemanager contains the "analyze" feature within the context menu
    • The local LLM could serve for other use cases where privacy matters

    TBD

    • Find or write capable one-shot and interactive MCP client
    • Find or write simple+secure file access MCP server
    • Create local LLM service with appropriate footprint, containerized
    • Shell command with options
    • KDE integration (Dolphin)
    • Package
    • Document

    Resources

    SUSE Observability MCP server by drutigliano

    Description

    The idea is to implement the SUSE Observability Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server as a specialized, middle-tier API designed to translate the complex, high-cardinality observability data from StackState (topology, metrics, and events) into highly structured, contextually rich, and LLM-ready snippets.

    This MCP Server abstract the StackState APIs. Its primary function is to serve as a Tool/Function Calling target for AI agents. When an AI receives an alert or a user query (e.g., "What caused the outage?"), the AI calls an MCP Server endpoint. The server then fetches the relevant operational facts, summarizes them, normalizes technical identifiers (like URNs and raw metric names) into natural language concepts, and returns a concise JSON or YAML payload. This payload is then injected directly into the LLM's prompt, ensuring the final diagnosis or action is grounded in real-time, accurate SUSE Observability data, effectively minimizing hallucinations.

    Goals

    • Grounding AI Responses: Ensure that all AI diagnoses, root cause analyses, and action recommendations are strictly based on verifiable, real-time data retrieved from the SUSE Observability StackState platform.
    • Simplifying Data Access: Abstract the complexity of StackState's native APIs (e.g., Time Travel, 4T Data Model) into simple, semantic functions that can be easily invoked by LLM tool-calling mechanisms.
    • Data Normalization: Convert complex, technical identifiers (like component URNs, raw metric names, and proprietary health states) into standardized, natural language terms that an LLM can easily reason over.
    • Enabling Automated Remediation: Define clear, action-oriented MCP endpoints (e.g., execute_runbook) that allow the AI agent to initiate automated operational workflows (e.g., restarts, scaling) after a diagnosis, closing the loop on observability.

     Hackweek STEP

    • Create a functional MCP endpoint exposing one (or more) tool(s) to answer queries like "What is the health of service X?") by fetching, normalizing, and returning live StackState data in an LLM-ready format.

     Scope

    • Implement read-only MCP server that can:
      • Connect to a live SUSE Observability instance and authenticate (with API token)
      • Use tools to fetch data for a specific component URN (e.g., current health state, metrics, possibly topology neighbors, ...).
      • Normalize response fields (e.g., URN to "Service Name," health state DEVIATING to "Unhealthy", raw metrics).
      • Return the data as a structured JSON payload compliant with the MCP specification.

    Deliverables

    • MCP Server v0.1 A running Golang MCP server with at least one tool.
    • A README.md and a test script (e.g., curl commands or a simple notebook) showing how an AI agent would call the endpoint and the resulting JSON payload.

    Outcome A functional and testable API endpoint that proves the core concept: translating complex StackState data into a simple, LLM-ready format. This provides the foundation for developing AI-driven diagnostics and automated remediation.

    Resources

    • https://www.honeycomb.io/blog/its-the-end-of-observability-as-we-know-it-and-i-feel-fine
    • https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/datadog-remote-mcp-server
    • https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-06-18/index
    • https://modelcontextprotocol.io/docs/develop/build-server

     Basic implementation

    • https://github.com/drutigliano19/suse-observability-mcp-server

    Results

    Successfully developed and delivered a fully functional SUSE Observability MCP Server that bridges language models with SUSE Observability's operational data. This project demonstrates how AI agents can perform intelligent troubleshooting and root cause analysis using structured access to real-time infrastructure data.

    Example execution

    Backporting patches using LLM by jankara

    Description

    Backporting Linux kernel fixes (either for CVE issues or as part of general git-fixes workflow) is boring and mostly mechanical work (dealing with changes in context, renamed variables, new helper functions etc.). The idea of this project is to explore usage of LLM for backporting Linux kernel commits to SUSE kernels using LLM.

    Goals

    • Create safe environment allowing LLM to run and backport patches without exposing the whole filesystem to it (for privacy and security reasons).
    • Write prompt that will guide LLM through the backporting process. Fine tune it based on experimental results.
    • Explore success rate of LLMs when backporting various patches.

    Resources

    • Docker
    • Gemini CLI

    Repository

    Current version of the container with some instructions for use are at: https://gitlab.suse.de/jankara/gemini-cli-backporter