Description

This project, Bugzilla goes AI, aims to boost developer productivity by creating an autonomous AI bug agent during Hackweek. The primary goal is to reduce the time employees spend triaging bugs by integrating Ollama to summarize issues, recommend next steps, and push focused daily reports to a Web Interface.

Goals

To reduce employee time spent on Bugzilla by implementing an AI tool that triages and summarizes bug reports, providing actionable recommendations to the team via Web Interface.

Project Charter

Bugzilla goes AI Phase 1

Description

Project Achievements during Hackweek

In this file you can read about what we achieved during Hackweek.

Project Achievements

Join this project Leave this project

Looking for hackers with the skills:

llm mcp bugzilla ai aiops mcpserver k8s vllm

This project is part of:

Hack Week 25

Activity

about 1 month ago: rtsvetkov joined this project.

about 1 month ago: calmeidadeoliveira liked this project.

about 1 month ago: andreabenini liked this project.

about 1 month ago: andreabenini disliked this project.

about 2 months ago: andreabenini liked this project.

about 2 months ago: gboiko liked this project.

about 2 months ago: Kajohnson joined this project.

about 2 months ago: barendartchuk liked this project.

about 2 months ago: bmwiedemann liked this project.

about 2 months ago: andreabenini joined this project.

about 2 months ago: paolodepa joined this project.

about 2 months ago: stripathy joined this project.

about 2 months ago: huanxie liked this project.

about 2 months ago: kskarthik liked this project.

2 months ago: paolodepa disliked this project.

2 months ago: paolodepa liked this project.

2 months ago: paolodepa disliked this project.

2 months ago: paolodepa liked this project.

2 months ago: ybonatakis liked this project.

2 months ago: dgedon liked this project.

2 months ago: oscar-barrios liked this project.

2 months ago: kskarthik added keyword "vllm" to this project.

2 months ago: kskarthik added keyword "k8s" to this project.

2 months ago: kskarthik added keyword "mcpserver" to this project.

2 months ago: kskarthik added keyword "ai" to this project.

Comments

about 2 months ago by lkocman | Reply

This might be interesting together with https://hackweek.opensuse.org/25/projects/opensuse-community-edition-of-packtrack

So we would have a new issue assignment experience for openSUSE contributors.

AI handling assignments of new issues (rather than bnc-triage team from past) and maintainers using (newly as an option) packtrac to actually see what issues are assigned to them.

Both would modernize the issue triage and issue progressing experience.

about 2 months ago by michals | Reply

AI summaries don't work: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0m17d8827ko

You don't want people to work based on information that's wrong about 20% of the time.

about 2 months ago by michals | Reply

See also this project using alternate approach that at least has some chance at being useful https://hackweek.opensuse.org/25/projects/bug-evaluation-and-management-assistant

about 1 month ago by rtsvetkov | Reply

Hi, I work on a similar smaller project. Perhaps it will be interesting to incorporate it in your approach.

It doesn't give direct recommendation, but evaluates which aspect of the bug is critical for a decision - recommends the question critical for the decision. GenAI-Powered Systemic Bug Evaluation and Management Assistant

Similar Projects

llm

Extended private brain - RAG my own scripts and data into offline LLM AI by tjyrinki_suse

Description

For purely studying purposes, I'd like to find out if I could teach an LLM some of my own accumulated knowledge, to use it as a sort of extended brain.

I might use qwen3-coder or something similar as a starting point.

Everything would be done 100% offline without network available to the container, since I prefer to see when network is needed, and make it so it's never needed (other than initial downloads).

Goals

Learn something about RAG, LLM, AI.
Find out if everything works offline as intended.
As an end result have a new way to access my own existing know-how, but so that I can query the wisdom in them.
Be flexible to pivot in any direction, as long as there are new things learned.

Resources

To be found on the fly.

Timeline

Day 1 (of 4)

Tried out a RAG demo, expanded on feeding it my own data
Experimented with qwen3-coder to add a persistent chat functionality, and keeping vectors in a pickle file
Optimizations to keep everything within context window
Learn and add a bit of PyTest

Day 2

More experimenting and more data
Study ChromaDB
Add a Web UI that works from another computer even though the container sees network is down

Day 3

The above RAG is working well enough for demonstration purposes.
Pivot to trying out OpenCode, configuring local Ollama qwen3-coder there, to analyze the RAG demo.
Figured out how to configure Ollama template to be usable under OpenCode. OpenCode locally is super slow to just running qwen3-coder alone.

Day 4 (final day)

Battle with OpenCode that was both slow and kept on piling up broken things.
Call it success as after all the agentic AI was working locally.
Clean up the mess left behind a bit.

Blog Post

Summarized the findings at blog post.

Explore LLM evaluation metrics by thbertoldi

Description

Learn the best practices for evaluating LLM performance with an open-source framework such as DeepEval.

Goals

Curate the knowledge learned during practice and present it to colleagues.

-> Maybe publish a blog post on SUSE's blog?

Resources

https://deepeval.com

https://docs.pactflow.io/docs/bi-directional-contract-testing

Backporting patches using LLM by jankara

Description

Backporting Linux kernel fixes (either for CVE issues or as part of general git-fixes workflow) is boring and mostly mechanical work (dealing with changes in context, renamed variables, new helper functions etc.). The idea of this project is to explore usage of LLM for backporting Linux kernel commits to SUSE kernels using LLM.

Goals

Create safe environment allowing LLM to run and backport patches without exposing the whole filesystem to it (for privacy and security reasons).
Write prompt that will guide LLM through the backporting process. Fine tune it based on experimental results.
Explore success rate of LLMs when backporting various patches.

Resources

Docker
Gemini CLI

Repository

Current version of the container with some instructions for use are at: https://gitlab.suse.de/jankara/gemini-cli-backporter

Self-Scaling LLM Infrastructure Powered by Rancher by ademicev0

Self-Scaling LLM Infrastructure Powered by Rancher

Description

The Problem

Running LLMs can get expensive and complex pretty quickly.

Today there are typically two choices:

Use cloud APIs like OpenAI or Anthropic. Easy to start with, but costs add up at scale.
Self-host everything - set up Kubernetes, figure out GPU scheduling, handle scaling, manage model serving... it's a lot of work.

What if there was a middle ground?

What if infrastructure scaled itself instead of making you scale it?

Can we use existing Rancher capabilities like CAPI, autoscaling, and GitOps to make this simpler instead of building everything from scratch?

Project Repository: github.com/alexander-demicev/llmserverless

What This Project Does

A key feature is hybrid deployment: requests can be routed based on complexity or privacy needs. Simple or low-sensitivity queries can use public APIs (like OpenAI), while complex or private requests are handled in-house on local infrastructure. This flexibility allows balancing cost, privacy, and performance - using cloud for routine tasks and on-premises resources for sensitive or demanding workloads.

A complete, self-scaling LLM infrastructure that:

Scales to zero when idle (no idle costs)
Scales up automatically when requests come in
Adds more nodes when needed, removes them when demand drops
Runs on any infrastructure - laptop, bare metal, or cloud

Think of it as "serverless for LLMs" - focus on building, the infrastructure handles itself.

How It Works

A combination of open source tools working together:

Flow:

Users interact with OpenWebUI (chat interface)
Requests go to LiteLLM Gateway
LiteLLM routes requests to:
- Ollama (Knative) for local model inference (auto-scales pods)
- Or cloud APIs for fallback

Creating test suite using LLM on existing codebase of a solar router by fcrozat

Description

Two years ago, I evaluated solar routers as part of hackweek24, I've assembled one and it is running almost smoothly.

However, its code quality is not perfect and the codebase doesn't have any testcase (which is tricky, since it is embedded code and rely on getting external data to react).

Before improving the code itself, a testsuite should be created to ensure code additional don't cause regression.

Goals

Create a testsuite, allowing to test solar router code in a virtual environment. Using LLM to help to create this test suite.

If succesful, try to improve the codebase itself by having it reviewed by LLM.

Resources

Solar router github project

mcp

Docs Navigator MCP: SUSE Edition by mackenzie.techdocs

Description

Docs Navigator MCP: SUSE Edition is an AI-powered documentation navigator that makes finding information across SUSE, Rancher, K3s, and RKE2 documentation effortless. Built as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, it enables semantic search, intelligent Q&A, and documentation summarization using 100% open-source AI models (no API keys required!). The project also allows you to bring your own keys from Anthropic and Open AI for parallel processing.

Goals

[ X ] Build functional MCP server with documentation tools
[ X ] Implement semantic search with vector embeddings
[ X ] Create user-friendly web interface
[ X ] Optimize indexing performance (parallel processing)
[ X ] Add SUSE branding and polish UX
[ X ] Stretch Goal: Add more documentation sources
[ X ] Stretch Goal: Implement document change detection for auto-updates

Coming Soon!

Community Feedback: Test with real users and gather improvement suggestions

Resources

Repository: Docs Navigator MCP: SUSE Edition GitHub
UI Demo: Live UI Demo of Docs Navigator MCP: SUSE Edition

Try to use AI and MCP for ACPI table analysis by joeyli

Description

Try to use AI and MCP if they can help with ACPI table analysis.

Goals

It's not easy for looking at ACPI tables even it be disassemble to ASL. I want to learn AI and MCP in Hackweek 25 to see if they can help ACPI table analysis.

Resources

Any resources about AI and MCP.

"what is it" file and directory analysis via MCP and local LLM, for console and KDE by rsimai

Description

Users sometimes wonder what files or directories they find on their local PC are good for. If they can't determine from the filename or metadata, there should an easy way to quickly analyze the content and at least guess the meaning. An LLM could help with that, through the use of a filesystem MCP and to-text-converters for typical file types. Ideally this is integrated into the desktop environment but works as well from a console. All data is processed locally or "on premise", no artifacts remain or leave the system.

Goals

The user can run a command from the console, to check on a file or directory
The filemanager contains the "analyze" feature within the context menu
The local LLM could serve for other use cases where privacy matters

TBD

Find or write capable one-shot and interactive MCP client
Find or write simple+secure file access MCP server
Create local LLM service with appropriate footprint, containerized
Shell command with options
KDE integration (Dolphin)
Package
Document

Resources

SUSE Observability MCP server by drutigliano

Description

The idea is to implement the SUSE Observability Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server as a specialized, middle-tier API designed to translate the complex, high-cardinality observability data from StackState (topology, metrics, and events) into highly structured, contextually rich, and LLM-ready snippets.

This MCP Server abstract the StackState APIs. Its primary function is to serve as a Tool/Function Calling target for AI agents. When an AI receives an alert or a user query (e.g., "What caused the outage?"), the AI calls an MCP Server endpoint. The server then fetches the relevant operational facts, summarizes them, normalizes technical identifiers (like URNs and raw metric names) into natural language concepts, and returns a concise JSON or YAML payload. This payload is then injected directly into the LLM's prompt, ensuring the final diagnosis or action is grounded in real-time, accurate SUSE Observability data, effectively minimizing hallucinations.

Goals

Grounding AI Responses: Ensure that all AI diagnoses, root cause analyses, and action recommendations are strictly based on verifiable, real-time data retrieved from the SUSE Observability StackState platform.
Simplifying Data Access: Abstract the complexity of StackState's native APIs (e.g., Time Travel, 4T Data Model) into simple, semantic functions that can be easily invoked by LLM tool-calling mechanisms.
Data Normalization: Convert complex, technical identifiers (like component URNs, raw metric names, and proprietary health states) into standardized, natural language terms that an LLM can easily reason over.
Enabling Automated Remediation: Define clear, action-oriented MCP endpoints (e.g., execute_runbook) that allow the AI agent to initiate automated operational workflows (e.g., restarts, scaling) after a diagnosis, closing the loop on observability.

Hackweek STEP

Create a functional MCP endpoint exposing one (or more) tool(s) to answer queries like "What is the health of service X?") by fetching, normalizing, and returning live StackState data in an LLM-ready format.

Scope

Implement read-only MCP server that can:
- Connect to a live SUSE Observability instance and authenticate (with API token)
- Use tools to fetch data for a specific component URN (e.g., current health state, metrics, possibly topology neighbors, ...).
- Normalize response fields (e.g., URN to "Service Name," health state DEVIATING to "Unhealthy", raw metrics).
- Return the data as a structured JSON payload compliant with the MCP specification.

Deliverables

MCP Server v0.1 A running Golang MCP server with at least one tool.
A README.md and a test script (e.g., curl commands or a simple notebook) showing how an AI agent would call the endpoint and the resulting JSON payload.

Outcome A functional and testable API endpoint that proves the core concept: translating complex StackState data into a simple, LLM-ready format. This provides the foundation for developing AI-driven diagnostics and automated remediation.

Resources

https://www.honeycomb.io/blog/its-the-end-of-observability-as-we-know-it-and-i-feel-fine
https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/datadog-remote-mcp-server
https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-06-18/index
https://modelcontextprotocol.io/docs/develop/build-server

Basic implementation

https://github.com/drutigliano19/suse-observability-mcp-server

Results

Successfully developed and delivered a fully functional SUSE Observability MCP Server that bridges language models with SUSE Observability's operational data. This project demonstrates how AI agents can perform intelligent troubleshooting and root cause analysis using structured access to real-time infrastructure data.

Example execution

SUSE Edge Image Builder MCP by eminguez

Description

Based on my other hackweek project, SUSE Edge Image Builder's Json Schema I would like to build also a MCP to be able to generate EIB config files the AI way.

Realistically I don't think I'll be able to have something consumable at the end of this hackweek but at least I would like to start exploring MCPs, the difference between an API and MCP, etc.

Goals

Familiarize myself with MCPs
Unrealistic: Have an MCP that can generate an EIB config file

Resources

https://hackweek.opensuse.org/25/projects/suse-edge-image-builder-json-schema
Anything else :)

Result

https://github.com/e-minguez/eib-mcp

I've extensively used antigravity and its agent mode to code this. This heavily uses https://hackweek.opensuse.org/25/projects/suse-edge-image-builder-json-schema for the MCP to be built.

I've ended up learning a lot of things about "prompting", json schemas in general, some golang, MCPs and AI in general :)

Example:

Generate an Edge Image Builder configuration for an ISO image based on slmicro-6.2.iso, targeting x86_64 architecture. The output name should be 'my-edge-image' and it should install to /dev/sda. It should deploy a 3 nodes kubernetes cluster with nodes names "node1", "node2" and "node3" as: * hostname: node1, IP: 1.1.1.1, role: initializer * hostname: node2, IP: 1.1.1.2, role: agent * hostname: node3, IP: 1.1.1.3, role: agent The kubernetes version should be k3s 1.33.4-k3s1 and it should deploy a cert-manager helm chart (the latest one available according to https://cert-manager.io/docs/installation/helm/). It should create a user called "suse" with password "suse" and set ntp to "foo.ntp.org". The VIP address for the API should be 1.2.3.4

Generates:

``` apiVersion: "1.0" image: arch: x86_64 baseImage: slmicro-6.2.iso imageType: iso outputImageName: my-edge-image kubernetes: helm: charts: - name: cert-manager repositoryName: jetstack

bugzilla

GenAI-Powered Systemic Bug Evaluation and Management Assistant by rtsvetkov

Motivation

What is the decision critical question which one can ask on a bug? How this question affects the decision on a bug and why?

Let's make GenAI look on the bug from the systemic point and evaluate what we don't know. Which piece of information is missing to take a decision?

Description

To build a tool that takes a raw bug report (including error messages and context) and uses a large language model (LLM) to generate a series of structured, Socratic-style or Systemic questions designed to guide a the integration and development toward the root cause, rather than just providing a direct, potentially incorrect fix.

Goals

Set up a Python environment

Set the environment and get a Gemini API key. 2. Collect 5-10 realistic bug reports (from open-source projects, personal projects, or public forums like Stack Overflow—include the error message and the initial context).

Build the Dialogue Loop

Write a basic Python script using the Gemini API.
Implement a simple conversational loop: User Input (Bug) -> AI Output (Question) -> User Input (Answer to AI's question) -> AI Output (Next Question). Code Implementation

Socratic/Systemic Strategy Implementation

Refine the logic to ensure the questions follow a Socratic and Systemic path (e.g., from symptom-> context -> assumptions -> -> critical parts -> ).
Implement Function Calling (an advanced feature of the Gemini API) to suggest specific actions to the user, like "Run a ping test" or "Check the database logs."
Implement Bugzillla call to collect the
Implement Questioning Framework as LLVM pre-conditioning
Define set of instructions
Assemble the Tool

Resources

What are Systemic Questions?

Systemic questions explore the relationships, patterns, and interactions within a system rather than focusing on isolated elements.
In IT, they help uncover hidden dependencies, feedback loops, assumptions, and side-effects during debugging or architecture analysis.

Gitlab Project

gitlab.suse.de/sle-prjmgr/BugDecisionCritical_Question

issuefs: FUSE filesystem representing issues (e.g. JIRA) for the use with AI agents code-assistants by llansky3

Description

Creating a FUSE filesystem (issuefs) that mounts issues from various ticketing systems (Github, Jira, Bugzilla, Redmine) as files to your local file system.

And why this is good idea?

User can use favorite command line tools to view and search the tickets from various sources
User can use AI agents capabilities from your favorite IDE or cli to ask question about the issues, project or functionality while providing relevant tickets as context without extra work.
User can use it during development of the new features when you let the AI agent to jump start the solution. The issuefs will give the AI agent the context (AI agents just read few more files) about the bug or requested features. No need for copying and pasting issues to user prompt or by using extra MCP tools to access the issues. These you can still do but this approach is on purpose different.

Goals

Add Github issue support
Proof the concept/approach by apply the approach on itself using Github issues for tracking and development of new features
Add support for Bugzilla and Redmine using this approach in the process of doing it. Record a video of it.
Clean-up and test the implementation and create some documentation
Create a blog post about this approach

Resources

There is a prototype implementation here. This currently sort of works with JIRA only.

ai

Local AI assistant with optional integrations and mobile companion by livdywan

Description

Setup a local AI assistant for research, brainstorming and proof reading. Look into SurfSense, Open WebUI and possibly alternatives. Explore integration with services like openQA. There should be no cloud dependencies. Mobile phone support or an additional companion app would be a bonus. The goal is not to develop everything from scratch.

User Story

Allison Average wants a one-click local AI assistent on their openSUSE laptop.
Ash Awesome wants AI on their phone without an expensive subscription.

Goals

Evaluate a local SurfSense setup for day to day productivity
Test opencode for vibe coding and tool calling

Timeline

Day 1

Took a look at SurfSense and started setting up a local instance.
Unfortunately the container setup did not work well. Tho this was a great opportunity to learn some new podman commands and refresh my memory on how to recover a corrupted btrfs filesystem.

Day 2

Due to its sheer size and complexity SurfSense seems to have triggered btrfs fragmentation. Naturally this was not visible in any podman-related errors or in the journal. So this took up much of my second day.

Day 3

Trying out opencode with Qwen3-Coder and Qwen2.5-Coder.

Day 4

Context size is a thing, and models are not equally usable for vibe coding.
Through arduous browsing for ollama models I did find some like myaniu/qwen2.5-1m:7b with 1m but even then it is not obvious if they are meant for tool calls.

Day 5

Whilst trying to make opencode usable I discovered ramalama which worked instantly and very well.

Outcomes

surfsense

I could not easily set this up completely. Maybe in part due to my filesystem issues. Was expecting this to be less of an effort.

opencode

Installing opencode and ollama in my distrobox container along with the following configs worked for me.

When preparing a new project from scratch it is a good idea to start out with a template.

opencode.json

``` {

Flaky Tests AI Finder for Uyuni and MLM Test Suites by oscar-barrios

Description

Our current Grafana dashboards provide a great overview of test suite health, including a panel for "Top failed tests." However, identifying which of these failures are due to legitimate bugs versus intermittent "flaky tests" is a manual, time-consuming process. These flaky tests erode trust in our test suites and slow down development.

This project aims to build a simple but powerful Python script that automates flaky test detection. The script will directly query our Prometheus instance for the historical data of each failed test, using the jenkins_build_test_case_failure_age metric. It will then format this data and send it to the Gemini API with a carefully crafted prompt, asking it to identify which tests show a flaky pattern.

The final output will be a clean JSON list of the most probable flaky tests, which can then be used to populate a new "Top Flaky Tests" panel in our existing Grafana test suite dashboard.

Goals

By the end of Hack Week, we aim to have a single, working Python script that:

Connects to Prometheus and executes a query to fetch detailed test failure history.
Processes the raw data into a format suitable for the Gemini API.
Successfully calls the Gemini API with the data and a clear prompt.
Parses the AI's response to extract a simple list of flaky tests.
Saves the list to a JSON file that can be displayed in Grafana.
New panel in our Dashboard listing the Flaky tests

Resources

Jenkins Prometheus Exporter: https://github.com/uyuni-project/jenkins-exporter/
Data Source: Our internal Prometheus server.
Key Metric: jenkins_build_test_case_failure_age{jobname, buildid, suite, case, status, failedsince}.
Existing Query for Reference: count by (suite) (max_over_time(jenkins_build_test_case_failure_age{status=~"FAILED|REGRESSION", jobname="$jobname"}[$__range])).
AI Model: The Google Gemini API.
Example about how to interact with Gemini API: https://github.com/srbarrios/FailTale/
Visualization: Our internal Grafana Dashboard.
Internal IaC: https://gitlab.suse.de/galaxy/infrastructure/-/tree/master/srv/salt/monitoring

Outcome

GenAI-Powered Systemic Bug Evaluation and Management Assistant by rtsvetkov

Motivation

What is the decision critical question which one can ask on a bug? How this question affects the decision on a bug and why?

Let's make GenAI look on the bug from the systemic point and evaluate what we don't know. Which piece of information is missing to take a decision?

Description

Goals

Set up a Python environment

Build the Dialogue Loop

Write a basic Python script using the Gemini API.
Implement a simple conversational loop: User Input (Bug) -> AI Output (Question) -> User Input (Answer to AI's question) -> AI Output (Next Question). Code Implementation

Socratic/Systemic Strategy Implementation

Refine the logic to ensure the questions follow a Socratic and Systemic path (e.g., from symptom-> context -> assumptions -> -> critical parts -> ).
Implement Function Calling (an advanced feature of the Gemini API) to suggest specific actions to the user, like "Run a ping test" or "Check the database logs."
Implement Bugzillla call to collect the
Implement Questioning Framework as LLVM pre-conditioning
Define set of instructions
Assemble the Tool

Resources

What are Systemic Questions?

Gitlab Project

gitlab.suse.de/sle-prjmgr/BugDecisionCritical_Question

Song Search with CLAP by gcolangiuli

Description

Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining (CLAP) is an open-source library that enables the training of a neural network on both Audio and Text descriptions, making it possible to search for Audio using a Text input. Several pre-trained models for song search are already available on huggingface

Goals

Evaluate how CLAP can be used for song searching and determine which types of queries yield the best results by developing a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) in Python. Based on the results of this MVP, future steps could include:

Music Tagging;
Free text search;
Integration with an LLM (for example, with MCP or the OpenAI API) for music suggestions based on your own library.

The code for this project will be entirely written using AI to better explore and demonstrate AI capabilities.

Result

In this MVP we implemented:

Async Song Analysis with Clap model
Free Text Search of the songs
Similar song search based on vector representation
Containerised version with web interface

We also documented what went well and what can be improved in the use of AI.

You can have a look at the result here:

Future implementation can be related to performance improvement and stability of the analysis.

References

CLAP: The main model being researched;
huggingface: Pre-trained models for CLAP;
Free Music Archive: Creative Commons songs that can be used for testing;

Explore LLM evaluation metrics by thbertoldi

Description

Learn the best practices for evaluating LLM performance with an open-source framework such as DeepEval.

Goals

Curate the knowledge learned during practice and present it to colleagues.

-> Maybe publish a blog post on SUSE's blog?

Resources

https://deepeval.com

https://docs.pactflow.io/docs/bi-directional-contract-testing

aiops

Explore LLM evaluation metrics by thbertoldi

Description

Learn the best practices for evaluating LLM performance with an open-source framework such as DeepEval.

Goals

Curate the knowledge learned during practice and present it to colleagues.

-> Maybe publish a blog post on SUSE's blog?

Resources

https://deepeval.com

https://docs.pactflow.io/docs/bi-directional-contract-testing

Exploring Modern AI Trends and Kubernetes-Based AI Infrastructure by jluo

Description

Build a solid understanding of the current landscape of Artificial Intelligence and how modern cloud-native technologies—especially Kubernetes—support AI workloads.

Goals

Use Gemini Learning Mode to guide the exploration, surface relevant concepts, and structure the learning journey:

Gain insight into the latest AI trends, tools, and architectural concepts.
Understand how Kubernetes and related cloud-native technologies are used in the AI ecosystem (model training, deployment, orchestration, MLOps).

Resources

Red Hat AI Topic Articles
- https://www.redhat.com/en/topics/ai
Kubeflow Documentation
- https://www.kubeflow.org/docs/
Q4 2025 CNCF Technology Landscape Radar report:
- https://www.cncf.io/announcements/2025/11/11/cncf-and-slashdata-report-finds-leading-ai-tools-gaining-adoption-in-cloud-native-ecosystems/
- https://www.cncf.io/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/cncfreporttechradar_111025a.pdf
Agent-to-Agent (A2A) Protocol
- https://developers.googleblog.com/en/a2a-a-new-era-of-agent-interoperability/

SUSE Observability MCP server by drutigliano

Description

Goals

Grounding AI Responses: Ensure that all AI diagnoses, root cause analyses, and action recommendations are strictly based on verifiable, real-time data retrieved from the SUSE Observability StackState platform.
Simplifying Data Access: Abstract the complexity of StackState's native APIs (e.g., Time Travel, 4T Data Model) into simple, semantic functions that can be easily invoked by LLM tool-calling mechanisms.
Data Normalization: Convert complex, technical identifiers (like component URNs, raw metric names, and proprietary health states) into standardized, natural language terms that an LLM can easily reason over.
Enabling Automated Remediation: Define clear, action-oriented MCP endpoints (e.g., execute_runbook) that allow the AI agent to initiate automated operational workflows (e.g., restarts, scaling) after a diagnosis, closing the loop on observability.