Project Description

At SCC, we have a rotating task of COOTW (Commanding Office of the Week). This task involves responding to customer requests from jira and slack help channels, monitoring production systems and doing small chores. Usually, we have documentation to help the COOTW answer questions and quickly find fixes. Most of these are distributed across github, trello and SUSE Support documentation. The aim of this project is to explore the magic of LLMs and create a conversational bot.

Goal for this Hackweek

  • Build data ingestion Data source:
    • SUSE KB docs
    • scc github docs
    • scc trello knowledge board
  • Test out new RAG architecture

  • https://gitlab.suse.de/ngetahun/cootwbot

Looking for hackers with the skills:

ai llm console gpu ml scc

This project is part of:

Hack Week 23 Hack Week 24

Activity

  • about 1 month ago: ngetahun added keyword "scc" to this project.
  • about 1 year ago: ngetahun liked this project.
  • about 1 year ago: ngetahun started this project.
  • about 1 year ago: ngetahun added keyword "ai" to this project.
  • about 1 year ago: ngetahun added keyword "llm" to this project.
  • about 1 year ago: ngetahun added keyword "console" to this project.
  • about 1 year ago: ngetahun added keyword "gpu" to this project.
  • about 1 year ago: ngetahun added keyword "ml" to this project.
  • about 1 year ago: ngetahun originated this project.

  • Comments

    Be the first to comment!

    Similar Projects

    ghostwrAIter - a local AI assisted tool for helping with support cases by paolodepa

    Description

    This project is meant to fight the loneliness of the support team members, providing them an AI assistant (hopefully) capable of scraping supportconfigs in a RAG fashion, trying to answer specific questions.

    Goals

    • Setup an Ollama backend, spinning one (or more??) code-focused LLMs selected by license, performance and quality of the results between:
    • Setup a Web UI for it, choosing an easily extensible and customizable option between:
    • Extend the solution in order to be able to:
      • Add ZIU/Concord shared folders to its RAG context
      • Add BZ cases, splitted in comments to its RAG context
        • A plus would be to login using the IDP portal to ghostwrAIter itself and use the same credentials to query BZ
      • Add specific packages picking them from IBS repos
        • A plus would be to login using the IDP portal to ghostwrAIter itself and use the same credentials to query IBS
        • A plus would be to desume the packages of interest and the right channel and version to be picked from the added BZ cases


    Gen-AI chatbots and test-automation of generated responses by mdati

    Description

    Start experimenting the generative SUSE-AI chat bot, asking questions on different areas of knowledge or science and possibly analyze the quality of the LLM model response, specific and comparative, checking the answers provided by different LLM models to a same query, using proper quality metrics or tools or methodologies.

    Try to define basic guidelines and requirements for quality test automation of AI-generated responses.

    First approach of investigation can be based on manual testing: methodologies, findings and data can be useful then to organize valid automated testing.

    Goals

    • Identify criteria and measuring scales for assessment of a text content.
    • Define quality of an answer/text based on defined criteria .
    • Identify some knowledge sectors and a proper list of problems/questions per sector.
    • Manually run query session and apply evaluation criteria to answers.
    • Draft requirements for test automation of AI answers.

    Resources

    • Announcement of SUSE-AI for Hack Week in Slack
    • Openplatform and related 3 LLM models gemma:2b, llama3.1:8b, qwen2.5-coder:3b.

    Notes

    • Foundation models (FMs):
      are large deep learning neural networks, trained on massive datasets, that have changed the way data scientists approach machine learning (ML). Rather than develop artificial intelligence (AI) from scratch, data scientists use a foundation model as a starting point to develop ML models that power new applications more quickly and cost-effectively.

    • Large language models (LLMs):
      are a category of foundation models pre-trained on immense amounts of data acquiring abilities by learning statistical relationships from vast amounts of text during a self- and semi-supervised training process, making them capable of understanding and generating natural language and other types of content , to perform a wide range of tasks.
      LLMs can be used for generative AI (artificial intelligence) to produce content based on input prompts in human language.

    Validation of a AI-generated answer is not an easy task to perform, as manually as automated.
    An LLM answer text shall contain a given level of informations: correcness, completeness, reasoning description etc.
    We shall rely in properly applicable and measurable criteria of validation to get an assessment in a limited amount of time and resources.


    Run local LLMs with Ollama and explore possible integrations with Uyuni by PSuarezHernandez

    Description

    Using Ollama you can easily run different LLM models in your local computer. This project is about exploring Ollama, testing different LLMs and try to fine tune them. Also, explore potential ways of integration with Uyuni.

    Goals

    • Explore Ollama
    • Test different models
    • Fine tuning
    • Explore possible integration in Uyuni

    Resources

    • https://ollama.com/
    • https://huggingface.co/
    • https://apeatling.com/articles/part-2-building-your-training-data-for-fine-tuning/


    Use local/private LLM for semantic knowledge search by digitaltomm

    Description

    Use a local LLM, based on SUSE AI (ollama, openwebui) to power geeko search (public instance: https://geeko.port0.org/).

    Goals

    Build a SUSE internal instance of https://geeko.port0.org/ that can operate on internal resources, crawling confluence.suse.com, gitlab.suse.de, etc.

    Resources

    Repo: https://github.com/digitaltom/semantic-knowledge-search

    Public instance: https://geeko.port0.org/

    Results

    Internal instance:

    I have an internal test instance running which has indexed a couple of internal wiki pages from the SCC team. It's using the ollama (llama3.1:8b) backend of suse-ai.openplatform.suse.com to create embedding vectors for indexed resources and to create a chat response. The semantic search for documents is done with a vector search inside of sqlite, using sqlite-vec.

    image


    Use AI tools to convert legacy perl scripts to bash by nadvornik

    Description

    Use AI tools to convert legacy perl scripts to bash

    Goals

    Uyuni project contains legacy perl scripts used for setup. The perl dependency could be removed, to reduce the container size. The goal of this project is to research use of AI tools for this task.

    Resources

    Aider

    Results:

    Aider is not the right tool for this. It works ok for small changes, but not for complete rewrite from one language to another.

    I got better results with direct API use from script.


    Run local LLMs with Ollama and explore possible integrations with Uyuni by PSuarezHernandez

    Description

    Using Ollama you can easily run different LLM models in your local computer. This project is about exploring Ollama, testing different LLMs and try to fine tune them. Also, explore potential ways of integration with Uyuni.

    Goals

    • Explore Ollama
    • Test different models
    • Fine tuning
    • Explore possible integration in Uyuni

    Resources

    • https://ollama.com/
    • https://huggingface.co/
    • https://apeatling.com/articles/part-2-building-your-training-data-for-fine-tuning/


    Gen-AI chatbots and test-automation of generated responses by mdati

    Description

    Start experimenting the generative SUSE-AI chat bot, asking questions on different areas of knowledge or science and possibly analyze the quality of the LLM model response, specific and comparative, checking the answers provided by different LLM models to a same query, using proper quality metrics or tools or methodologies.

    Try to define basic guidelines and requirements for quality test automation of AI-generated responses.

    First approach of investigation can be based on manual testing: methodologies, findings and data can be useful then to organize valid automated testing.

    Goals

    • Identify criteria and measuring scales for assessment of a text content.
    • Define quality of an answer/text based on defined criteria .
    • Identify some knowledge sectors and a proper list of problems/questions per sector.
    • Manually run query session and apply evaluation criteria to answers.
    • Draft requirements for test automation of AI answers.

    Resources

    • Announcement of SUSE-AI for Hack Week in Slack
    • Openplatform and related 3 LLM models gemma:2b, llama3.1:8b, qwen2.5-coder:3b.

    Notes

    • Foundation models (FMs):
      are large deep learning neural networks, trained on massive datasets, that have changed the way data scientists approach machine learning (ML). Rather than develop artificial intelligence (AI) from scratch, data scientists use a foundation model as a starting point to develop ML models that power new applications more quickly and cost-effectively.

    • Large language models (LLMs):
      are a category of foundation models pre-trained on immense amounts of data acquiring abilities by learning statistical relationships from vast amounts of text during a self- and semi-supervised training process, making them capable of understanding and generating natural language and other types of content , to perform a wide range of tasks.
      LLMs can be used for generative AI (artificial intelligence) to produce content based on input prompts in human language.

    Validation of a AI-generated answer is not an easy task to perform, as manually as automated.
    An LLM answer text shall contain a given level of informations: correcness, completeness, reasoning description etc.
    We shall rely in properly applicable and measurable criteria of validation to get an assessment in a limited amount of time and resources.


    New migration tool for Leap by lkocman

    Update

    I will call a meeting with other interested people at 11:00 CET https://meet.opensuse.org/migrationtool

    Description

    SLES 16 plans to have no yast tool in it. Leap 16 might keep some bits, however, we need a new tool for Leap to SLES migration, as this was previously handled by a yast2-migration-sle

    Goals

    A tool able to migrate Leap 16 to SLES 16, I would like to cover also other scenarios within openSUSE, as in many cases users would have to edit repository files manually.

    • Leap -> Leap n+1 (minor and major version updates)
    • Leap -> SLES docs
    • Leap -> Tumbleweed
    • Leap -> Slowroll
    • Leap Micro -> Leap Micro n+1 (minor and major version updates)
    • Leap Micro -> MicroOS

    Hackweek 24 update

    Marcela and I were working on the project from Brno coworking as well as finalizing pieces after the hackweek. We've tested several migration scenarios and it works. But it needs further polishing and testing.

    Projected was renamed to opensuse-migration-tool and was submitted to devel project https://build.opensuse.org/requests/1227281

    Repository

    https://github.com/openSUSE/opensuse-migration-tool

    Out of scope is any migration to an immutable system. I know Richard already has some tool for that.

    Resources

    Tracker for yast stack reduction code-o-o/leap/features#173 YaST stack reduction