While the python-based AppArmor utils (aa-logprof etc.) are much easier to understand and maintain than the old perl code, there are still some terribly long functions like parseprofiledata() in aa.py that are not too easy to understand. Also, using hasher() (a recursive array) as storage can have some strange side effects. Another problem is that test coverage isn't too good, especially for the bigger functions.
I already wrote the CapabilityRule and CapabilityRuleset classes (and also the BaseRule and BaseRuleset classes) some months ago, and changed the code to use those classes. This code is already in upstream bzr.
My plan for hackweek is to convert more rule types into classes, and to add full test coverage for them. Besides much more readable code, this will also result in "accidently" fixing some bugs that were not noticed yet.
A side goal is to keep the upstream devs busy with patch reviews by continueing my patch flood I started some weeks ago *g*
I'll start with network rules / the NetworkRule and NetworkRuleset classes, and then maybe roll a dice to decide what I'll convert next ;-)
This project is part of:
Hack Week 12
Activity
Comments
-
over 9 years ago by cboltz | Reply
Some minutes ago, I finally commited the NetworkRule and NetworkRuleset classes (and the patch that actually uses them) to AppArmor bzr - they were delayed by some previous patches with a slower-than-usual review (dependencies not only happen for packages ;-)
I'll continue to rewrite more rule types into classes, but that will probably have to wait after oSC15 and can also happen without formal hackweek tracking ;-)
Similar Projects
Team Hedgehogs' Data Observability Dashboard by gsamardzhiev
Description
This project aims to develop a comprehensive Data Observability Dashboard that provides r insights into key aspects of data quality and reliability. The dashboard will track:
Data Freshness: Monitor when data was last updated and flag potential delays.
Data Volume: Track table row counts to detect unexpected surges or drops in data.
Data Distribution: Analyze data for null values, outliers, and anomalies to ensure accuracy.
Data Schema: Track schema changes over time to prevent breaking changes.
The dashboard's aim is to support historical tracking to support proactive data management and enhance data trust across the data function.
Goals
Although the final goal is to create a power bi dashboard that we are able to monitor, our goals is to 1. Create the necessary tables that track the relevant metadata about our current data 2. Automate the process so it runs in a timely manner
Resources
AWS Redshift; AWS Glue, Airflow, Python, SQL
Why Hedgehogs?
Because we like them.
Run local LLMs with Ollama and explore possible integrations with Uyuni by PSuarezHernandez
Description
Using Ollama you can easily run different LLM models in your local computer. This project is about exploring Ollama, testing different LLMs and try to fine tune them. Also, explore potential ways of integration with Uyuni.
Goals
- Explore Ollama
- Test different models
- Fine tuning
- Explore possible integration in Uyuni
Resources
- https://ollama.com/
- https://huggingface.co/
- https://apeatling.com/articles/part-2-building-your-training-data-for-fine-tuning/
Symbol Relations by hli
Description
There are tools to build function call graphs based on parsing source code, for example, cscope.
This project aims to achieve a similar goal by directly parsing the disasembly (i.e. objdump) of a compiled binary. The assembly code is what the CPU sees, therefore more "direct". This may be useful in certain scenarios, such as gdb/crash debugging.
Detailed description and Demos can be found in the README file:
Supports x86 for now (because my customers only use x86 machines), but support for other architectures can be added easily.
Tested with python3.6
Goals
Any comments are welcome.
Resources
https://github.com/lhb-cafe/SymbolRelations
symrellib.py: mplements the symbol relation graph and the disassembly parser
symrel_tracer*.py: implements tracing (-t option)
symrel.py: "cli parser"
Ansible for add-on management by lmanfredi
Description
Machines can contains various combinations of add-ons and are often modified during the time.
The list of repos can change so I would like to create an automation able to reset the status to a given state, based on metadata available for these machines
Goals
Create an Ansible automation able to take care of add-on (repo list) configuration using metadata as reference
Resources
- Machines
- Repositories
- Developing modules
- Basic VM Guest management
- Module
zypper_repository_list - ansible-collections community.general
Results
Created WIP project Ansible-add-on-openSUSE
Make more sense of openQA test results using AI by livdywan
Description
AI has the potential to help with something many of us spend a lot of time doing which is making sense of openQA logs when a job fails.
User Story
Allison Average has a puzzled look on their face while staring at log files that seem to make little sense. Is this a known issue, something completely new or maybe related to infrastructure changes?
Goals
- Leverage a chat interface to help Allison
- Create a model from scratch based on data from openQA
- Proof of concept for automated analysis of openQA test results
Bonus
- Use AI to suggest solutions to merge conflicts
- This would need a merge conflict editor that can suggest solving the conflict
- Use image recognition for needles
Resources
Timeline
Day 1
- Conversing with open-webui to teach me how to create a model based on openQA test results
- Asking for example code using TensorFlow in Python
- Discussing log files to explore what to analyze
- Drafting a new project called Testimony (based on Implementing a containerized Python action) - the project name was also suggested by the assistant
Day 2
- Using NotebookLLM (Gemini) to produce conversational versions of blog posts
- Researching the possibility of creating a project logo with AI
- Asking open-webui, persons with prior experience and conducting a web search for advice
Highlights
- I briefly tested compared models to see if they would make me more productive. Between llama, gemma and mistral there was no amazing difference in the results for my case.
- Convincing the chat interface to produce code specific to my use case required very explicit instructions.
- Asking for advice on how to use open-webui itself better was frustratingly unfruitful both in trivial and more advanced regards.
- Documentation on source materials used by LLM's and tools for this purpose seems virtually non-existent - specifically if a logo can be generated based on particular licenses
Outcomes
- Chat interface-supported development is providing good starting points and open-webui being open source is more flexible than Gemini. Although currently some fancy features such as grounding and generated podcasts are missing.
- Allison still has to be very experienced with openQA to use a chat interface for test review. Publicly available system prompts would make that easier, though.