Almost all our laptops, and many servers, feature a TPM today. The TPM doesn't have the best reputation in the community because it could be used to lock down platforms or do nasty things with DRM. Under normal conditions on PCs, the TPM is controlled by the system owner and could actually be useful for almost anything involving crypto. Unfortunately the integration of the TPM in the OS is essentially non-existent. The introduction of the TPM2.0 standard complicates matters, because we now have two different devices with different APIs.
The goal of this project would be to identify reasonable use cases for the TPM, evaluate exisiting projects, and create ways how to integrate it into various workflows in openSUSE.
No Hackers yet
Looking for hackers with the skills:
This project is part of:
Hack Week 15
Activity
Comments
Be the first to comment!
Similar Projects
VulnHeap by r1chard-lyu
Description
The VulnHeap project is dedicated to the in-depth analysis and exploitation of vulnerabilities within heap memory management. It focuses on understanding the intricate workflow of heap allocation, chunk structures, and bin management, which are essential to identifying and mitigating security risks.
Goals
- Familiarize with heap
- Heap workflow
- Chunk and bin structure
- Vulnerabilities
- Vulnerability
- Use after free (UAF)
- Heap overflow
- Double free
- Use Docker to create a vulnerable environment and apply techniques to exploit it
Resources
- https://heap-exploitation.dhavalkapil.com/divingintoglibc_heap
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cloudburst/libheap/master/heap.png
- https://github.com/shellphish/how2heap?tab=readme-ov-file
CVE portal for SUSE Rancher products by gmacedo
Description
Currently it's a bit difficult for users to quickly see the list of CVEs affecting images in Rancher, RKE2, Harvester and Longhorn releases. Users need to individually look for each CVE in the SUSE CVE database page - https://www.suse.com/security/cve/ . This is not optimal, because those CVE pages are a bit hard to read and contain data for all SLE and BCI products too, making it difficult to easily see only the CVEs affecting the latest release of Rancher, for example. We understand that certain costumers are only looking for CVE data for Rancher and not SLE or BCI.
Goals
The objective is to create a simple to read and navigate page that contains only CVE data related to Rancher, RKE2, Harvester and Longhorn, where it's easy to search by a CVE ID, an image name or a release version. The page should also provide the raw data as an exportable CSV file.
It must be an MVP with the minimal amount of effort/time invested, but still providing great value to our users and saving the wasted time that the Rancher Security team needs to spend by manually sharing such data. It might not be long lived, as it can be replaced in 2-3 years with a better SUSE wide solution.
Resources
- The page must be simple and easy to read.
- The UI/UX must be as straightforward as possible with minimal visual noise.
- The content must be created automatically from the raw data that we already have internally.
- It must be updated automatically on a daily basis and on ad-hoc runs (when needed).
- The CVE status must be aligned with VEX.
- The raw data must be exportable as CSV file.
- Ideally it will be written in Go or pure Shell script with basic HTML and no external dependencies in CSS or JS.
Bot to identify reserved data leak in local files or when publishing on remote repository by mdati
Description
Scope here is to prevent reserved data or generally "unwanted", to be pushed and saved on a public repository, i.e. on Github, causing disclosure or leaking of reserved informations.
The above definition of reserved or "unwanted" may vary, depending on the context: sometime secret keys or password are stored in data or configuration files or hardcoded in source code and depending on the scope of the archive or the level of security, it can be either wanted, permitted or not at all.
As main target here, secrets will be registration keys or passwords, to be detected and managed locally or in a C.I. pipeline.
Goals
Detection:
- Local detection: detect secret words present in local files;
- Remote detection: detect secrets in files, in pipelines, going to be transferred on a remote repository, i.e. via
git push;
Reporting:
- report the result of detection on stderr and/or log files, noticed excluding the secret values.
Acton:
- Manage the detection, by either deleting or masking the impacted code or deleting/moving the file itself or simply notify it.
Resources
- Project repository, published on Github (link): m-dati/hkwk24;
- Reference folder: hkwk24/chksecret;
- First pull request (link): PR#1;
- Second PR, for improvements: PR#2;
- README.md and TESTS.md documentation files available in the repo root;
- Test subproject repository, for testing CI on push [TBD].
Notes
We use here some examples of secret words, that still can be improved.
The various patterns to match desired reserved words are written in a separated module, to be on demand updated or customized.
[Legend: TBD = to be done]
OIDC Loginproxy by toe
Description
Reverse proxies can be a useful option to separate authentication logic from application logic. SUSE and openSUSE use "loginproxies" as an authentication layer in front of several services.
Currently, loginproxies exist which support LDAP authentication or SAML authentication.
Goals
The goal of this Hack Week project is, to create another loginproxy which supports OpenID Connect authentication which can then act as a drop-in replacement for the existing LDAP or SAML loginproxies.
Testing is intended to focus on the integration with OIDC IDPs from Okta, KanIDM and Authentik.
Resources
Contributing to Linux Kernel security by pperego
Description
A couple of weeks ago, I found this blog post by Gustavo Silva, a Linux Kernel contributor.
I always strived to start again into hacking the Linux Kernel, so I asked Coverity scan dashboard access and I want to contribute to Linux Kernel by fixing some minor issues.
I want also to create a Linux Kernel fuzzing lab using qemu and syzkaller
Goals
- Fix at least 2 security bugs
- Create the fuzzing lab and having it running
The story so far
- Day 1: setting up a virtual machine for kernel development using Tumbleweed. Reading a lot of documentation, taking confidence with Coverity dashboard and with procedures to submit a kernel patch
- Day 2: I read really a lot of documentation and I triaged some findings on Coverity SAST dashboard. I have to confirm that SAST tool are great false positives generator, even for low hanging fruits.
- Day 3: Working on trivial changes after I read this blog post:
https://www.toblux.com/posts/2024/02/linux-kernel-patches.html. I have to take confidence
with the patch preparation and submit process yet.
- First trivial patch sent: using strtruefalse() macro instead of hard-coded strings in a staging driver for a lcd display
- Fix for a dereference before null check issue discovered by Coverity (CID 1601566) https://scan7.scan.coverity.com/#/project-view/52110/11354?selectedIssue=1601566
- Day 4: Triaging more issues found by Coverity.
- The patch for CID 1601566 was refused. The check against the NULL pointer was pointless so I prepared a version 2 of the patch removing the check.
- Fixed another dereference before NULL check in iwlmvmparsewowlaninfo_notif() routine (CID 1601547). This one was already submitted by another kernel hacker :(
- Day 5: Wrapping up. I had to do some minor rework on patch for CID 1601566. I found a stalker bothering me in private emails and people I interacted with me, advised he is a well known bothering person. Markus Elfring for the record.
Wrapping up: being back doing kernel hacking is amazing and I don't want to stop it. My battery pack is completely drained but changing the scope gave me a great twist and I really want to feel this energy not doing a single task for months.
I failed in setting up a fuzzing lab but I was too optimistic for the patch submission process.
The patches