Better support for Chromebooks
Chromebooks do have very limited hardware in terms of storage and RAM. But it is still the cheapest solution to a truly open source notebook, as it allows to replace its coreboot based bootloader with your own coreboot and payload (f.e. Tiano Core or Seabios).
By installing a standard proposal of Tumbleweed or Leap with btrfs you will be left with about 2-3 GB of free storage on a 16 GB eMMC storage for installing packages and saving files. In addition to that many features like hibernation, suspend and function buttons (TTY switching) don't work out of the box.
There is a special Ubuntu based distribution for Chromebooks available called "Gallium OS" (https://galliumos.org/). They do have a lot of patches and some neat configuration for XFCE4 to make it perfectly work on Chromebooks by still looking very nice and offering a lot of storage. But you know what it lacks? Correct, some Geeko love ;)
In this project following steps could be done to improve the openSUSE support on Chromebooks:
- port Chromebook specific patches of "Gallium OS" to Factory and upstream them if necessary/possible
- custom setup proposal for Chromebooks in Tumbleweed or a custom Image for Chromebooks
- including a modified XFCE configuration with openSUSE branding
- minimum selection of packages necessary for a proper desktop session (f.e. replace LibreOffice with smaller solutions)
- openSUSE Leap 15 Image for Chromebooks
- including a modified XFCE configuration with openSUSE branding
- minimum selection of packages necessary for a proper desktop session (f.e. replace LibreOffice with smaller solutions)
No Hackers yet
This project is part of:
Hack Week 17
Activity
Comments
-
over 7 years ago by suntorytimed | Reply
I can provide test hardware (Dell Chromebook 11 Education and Asus C200MA) with Coreboot and Tiano Core on it.
-
over 7 years ago by suntorytimed | Reply
The more I think about it, the more I want to do this as a hacker myself. Too many project ideas but not enough time
Reply to mbrugger
You know that we have support for an arm based chromebook? https://en.opensuse.org/HCL:ARMChromebook ask @algraf for more info
# A First Level Header ## A Second Level Header Use one asterisk to *emphasize* Use two asterisks for **strong emphasis** - Use hyphens - for unordereed - lists This is an [link to example.com](http://example.com/) This is an image  This is a user link @hans This is a project link hw#some-cool-title
-
-
Reply to suntorytimed
The more I think about it, the more I want to do this as a hacker myself. Too many project ideas but not enough time
# A First Level Header ## A Second Level Header Use one asterisk to *emphasize* Use two asterisks for **strong emphasis** - Use hyphens - for unordereed - lists This is an [link to example.com](http://example.com/) This is an image  This is a user link @hans This is a project link hw#some-cool-title
Similar Projects
early stage kdump support by mbrugger
Project Description
When we experience a early boot crash, we are not able to analyze the kernel dump, as user-space wasn't able to load the crash system. The idea is to make the crash system compiled into the host kernel (think of initramfs) so that we can create a kernel dump really early in the boot process.
Goal for the Hackweeks
- Investigate if this is possible and the implications it would have (done in HW21)
- Hack up a PoC (done in HW22 and HW23)
- Prepare RFC series (giving it's only one week, we are entering wishful thinking territory here).
update HW23
- I was able to include the crash kernel into the kernel Image.
- I'll need to find a way to load that from
init/main.c:start_kernel()probably afterkcsan_init() - I workaround for a smoke test was to hack
kexec_file_load()systemcall which has two problems:- My initramfs in the porduction kernel does not have a new enough kexec version, that's not a blocker but where the week ended
- As the crash kernel is part of init.data it will be already stale once I can call
kexec_file_load()from user-space.
The solution is probably to rewrite the POC so that the invocation can be done from init.text (that's my theory) but I'm not sure if I can reuse the kexec infrastructure in the kernel from there, which I rely on heavily.
update HW24
- Day1
- rebased on v6.12 with no problems others then me breaking the config
- setting up a new compilation and qemu/virtme env
- getting desperate as nothing works that used to work
- Day 2
- getting to call the invocation of loading the early kernel from
__initafterkcsan_init()
- getting to call the invocation of loading the early kernel from
Day 3
- fix problem of memdup not being able to alloc so much memory... use 64K page sizes for now
- code refactoring
- I'm now able to load the crash kernel
- When using virtme I can boot into the crash kernel, also it doesn't boot completely (major milestone!), crash in
elfcorehdr_read_notes()
Day 4
- crash systems crashes (no pun intended) in
copy_old_mempage()link; will need to understand elfcorehdr... - call path
vmcore_init() -> parse_crash_elf_headers() -> elfcorehdr_read() -> read_from_oldmem() -> copy_oldmem_page() -> copy_to_iter()
- crash systems crashes (no pun intended) in
Day 5
- hacking
arch/arm64/kernel/crash_dump.c:copy_old_mempage()to see if crash system really starts. It does. - fun fact: retested with more reserved memory and with UEFI FW, host kernel crashes in init but directly starts the crash kernel, so it works (somehow) \o/
- hacking
TODOs
- fix elfcorehdr so that we actually can make use of all this...
- test where in the boot
__init()chain we can/should callkexec_early_dump()
pudc - A PID 1 process that barks to the internet by mssola
Description
As a fun exercise in order to dig deeper into the Linux kernel, its interfaces, the RISC-V architecture, and all the dragons in between; I'm building a blog site cooked like this:
- The backend is written in a mixture of C and RISC-V assembly.
- The backend is actually PID1 (for real, not within a container).
- We poll and parse incoming HTTP requests ourselves.
- The frontend is a mere HTML page with htmx.
The project is meant to be Linux-specific, so I'm going to use io_uring, pidfs, namespaces, and Linux-specific features in order to drive all of this.
I'm open for suggestions and so on, but this is meant to be a solo project, as this is more of a learning exercise for me than anything else.
Goals
- Have a better understanding of different Linux features from user space down to the kernel internals.
- Most importantly: have fun.
Resources
pudc - A PID 1 process that barks to the internet by mssola
Description
As a fun exercise in order to dig deeper into the Linux kernel, its interfaces, the RISC-V architecture, and all the dragons in between; I'm building a blog site cooked like this:
- The backend is written in a mixture of C and RISC-V assembly.
- The backend is actually PID1 (for real, not within a container).
- We poll and parse incoming HTTP requests ourselves.
- The frontend is a mere HTML page with htmx.
The project is meant to be Linux-specific, so I'm going to use io_uring, pidfs, namespaces, and Linux-specific features in order to drive all of this.
I'm open for suggestions and so on, but this is meant to be a solo project, as this is more of a learning exercise for me than anything else.
Goals
- Have a better understanding of different Linux features from user space down to the kernel internals.
- Most importantly: have fun.
Resources
Bring to Cockpit + System Roles capabilities from YAST by miguelpc
Bring to Cockpit + System Roles features from YAST
Cockpit and System Roles have been added to SLES 16 There are several capabilities in YAST that are not yet present in Cockpit and System Roles We will follow the principle of "automate first, UI later" being System Roles the automation component and Cockpit the UI one.
Goals
The idea is to implement service configuration in System Roles and then add an UI to manage these in Cockpit. For some capabilities it will be required to have an specific Cockpit Module as they will interact with a reasource already configured.
Resources
A plan on capabilities missing and suggested implementation is available here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZhX-Ip9MKJNeKSYV3bSZG4Qc5giuY7XSV0U61Ecu9lo/edit
Linux System Roles: https://linux-system-roles.github.io/