OpenPlatform Self-Service Portal by tmuntan1

Description

In SUSE IT, we developed an internal developer platform for our engineers using SUSE technologies such as RKE2, SUSE Virtualization, and Rancher. While it works well for our existing users, the onboarding process could be better.

To improve our customer experience, I would like to build a self-service portal to make it easy for people to accomplish common actions. To get started, I would have the portal create Jira SD tickets for our customers to have better information in our tickets, but eventually I want to add automation to reduce our workload.

Goals

• Build a frontend website (Angular) that helps customers create Jira SD tickets.
• Build a backend (Rust with Axum) for the backend, which would do all the hard work for the frontend.

Resources (SUSE VPN only)

• development site: https://ui-dev.openplatform.suse.com/login?returnUrl=%2Fopenplatform%2Fforms
• https://gitlab.suse.de/itpe/core/open-platform/op-portal/backend
• https://gitlab.suse.de/itpe/core/open-platform/op-portal/frontend

---

Learn a bit of embedded programming with Rust in a micro:bit v2 by aplanas

Description

micro:bit is a small single board computer with a ARM Cortex-M4 with the FPU extension, with a very constrain amount of memory and a bunch of sensors and leds.

The board is very well documented, with schematics and code for all the features available, so is an excellent platform for learning embedded programming.

Rust is a system programming language that can generate ARM code, and has crates (libraries) to access the micro:bit hardware. There is plenty documentation about how to make small programs that will run in the micro:bit.

Goals

Start learning about embedded programming in Rust, and maybe make some code to the small KS4036F Robot car from keyestudio.

Resources

• micro:bit
• KS4036F
• microbit technical documentation
• schematic
• impl Rust for micro:bit
• Rust Embedded MB2 Discovery Book
• nRF-HAL
• nRF Microbit-v2 BSP (blocking)
• knurling-rs
• C++ microbit codal
• microbit-bsp for Embassy
• Embassy

Diary

Day 1

• Start reading https://mb2.implrust.com/abstraction-layers.html
• Prepare the dev environment (cross compiler, probe-rs)
• Flash first code in the board (blinky led)
• Checking differences between BSP and HAL
• Compile and install a more complex example, with stack protection
• Reading about the simplicity of xtask, as alias for workspace execution
• Reading the CPP code of the official micro:bit libraries. They have a font!

Day 2

• There are multiple BSP for the microbit. One is using async code for non-blocking operations
• Download and study a bit the API for microbit-v2, the nRF official crate
• Take a look of the KS4036F programming, seems that the communication is multiplexed via I2C
• The motor speed can be selected via PWM (pulse with modulation): power it longer (high frequency), and it will increase the speed
• Scrolling some text
• Debug by printing! defmt is a crate that can be used with probe-rs to emit logs
• Start reading input from the board: buttons
• The logo can be touched and detected as a floating point value

Day 3

• A bit confused how to read the float value from a pin

---

Arcticwolf - A rust based user space NFS server by vcheng

Description

Rust has similar performance to C. Also, have a better async IO module and high integration with io_uring. This project aims to develop a user-space NFS server based on Rust.

Goals

• Get an understanding of how cargo works
• Get an understanding of how XDR was generated with xdrgen
• Create the RUST-based NFS server that supports basic operations like mount/readdir/read/write

Result (2025 Hackweek)

• In progress PR: https://github.com/Vicente-Cheng/arcticwolf/pull/1

Resources

https://github.com/Vicente-Cheng/arcticwolf

---

Mail client with mailing list workflow support in Rust by acervesato

Description

To create a mail user interface using Rust programming language, supporting mailing list patches workflow. I know, aerc is already there, but I would like to create something simpler, without integrated protocols. Just a plain user interface that is using some crates to read and create emails which are fetched and sent via external tools.

I already know Rust, but not the async support, which is needed in this case in order to handle events inside the mail folder and to send notifications.

Goals

• simple user interface in the style of aerc, with some vim keybindings for motions and search
• automatic run of external tools (like mbsync) for checking emails
• automatic run commands for notifications
• apply patch set from ML
• tree-sitter support with styles

Resources

• ratatui: user interface (https://ratatui.rs/)
• notify: folder watcher (https://docs.rs/notify/latest/notify/)
• mail-parser: parser for emails (https://crates.io/crates/mail-parser)
• mail-builder: create emails in proper format (https://docs.rs/mail-builder/latest/mail_builder/)
• gitpatch: ML support (https://crates.io/crates/gitpatch)
• tree-sitter-rust: support for mail format (https://crates.io/crates/tree-sitter)

---

Learn how to use the Relm4 Rust GUI crate by xiaoguang_wang

Relm4 is based on gtk4-rs and compatible with libadwaita. The gtk4-rs crate provides all the tools necessary to develop applications. Building on this foundation, Relm4 makes developing more idiomatic, simpler, and faster.

https://github.com/Relm4/Relm4

---

bpftrace contribution by mkoutny

Description

bpftrace is a great tool, no need to sing odes to it here. It can access any kernel data and process them in real time. It provides helpers for some common Linux kernel structures but not all.

Goals

• set up bpftrace toolchain
• learn about bpftrace implementation and internals
• implement support for percpu_counters
• look into some of the first issues
• send a refined PR (on Thu)

Resources

• https://bpftrace.org/
• https://docs.kernel.org/

---

Backporting patches using LLM by jankara

Description

Backporting Linux kernel fixes (either for CVE issues or as part of general git-fixes workflow) is boring and mostly mechanical work (dealing with changes in context, renamed variables, new helper functions etc.). The idea of this project is to explore usage of LLM for backporting Linux kernel commits to SUSE kernels using LLM.

Goals

• Create safe environment allowing LLM to run and backport patches without exposing the whole filesystem to it (for privacy and security reasons).
• Write prompt that will guide LLM through the backporting process. Fine tune it based on experimental results.
• Explore success rate of LLMs when backporting various patches.

Resources

• Docker
• Gemini CLI

Repository

Current version of the container with some instructions for use are at: https://gitlab.suse.de/jankara/gemini-cli-backporter

---

early stage kdump support by mbrugger

Project Description

When we experience a early boot crash, we are not able to analyze the kernel dump, as user-space wasn't able to load the crash system. The idea is to make the crash system compiled into the host kernel (think of initramfs) so that we can create a kernel dump really early in the boot process.

Goal for the Hackweeks

1. Investigate if this is possible and the implications it would have (done in HW21)
2. Hack up a PoC (done in HW22 and HW23)
3. Prepare RFC series (giving it's only one week, we are entering wishful thinking territory here).

update HW23

• I was able to include the crash kernel into the kernel Image.
• I'll need to find a way to load that from init/main.c:start_kernel() probably after kcsan_init()
• I workaround for a smoke test was to hack kexec_file_load() systemcall which has two problems:
  1. My initramfs in the porduction kernel does not have a new enough kexec version, that's not a blocker but where the week ended
  2. As the crash kernel is part of init.data it will be already stale once I can call kexec_file_load() from user-space.

The solution is probably to rewrite the POC so that the invocation can be done from init.text (that's my theory) but I'm not sure if I can reuse the kexec infrastructure in the kernel from there, which I rely on heavily.

update HW24

• Day1
  • rebased on v6.12 with no problems others then me breaking the config
  • setting up a new compilation and qemu/virtme env
  • getting desperate as nothing works that used to work
• Day 2
  • getting to call the invocation of loading the early kernel from __init after kcsan_init()

• Day 3

  • fix problem of memdup not being able to alloc so much memory... use 64K page sizes for now
  • code refactoring
  • I'm now able to load the crash kernel
  • When using virtme I can boot into the crash kernel, also it doesn't boot completely (major milestone!), crash in elfcorehdr_read_notes()

• Day 4

  • crash systems crashes (no pun intended) in copy_old_mempage() link; will need to understand elfcorehdr...
  • call path vmcore_init() -> parse_crash_elf_headers() -> elfcorehdr_read() -> read_from_oldmem() -> copy_oldmem_page() -> copy_to_iter()

• Day 5

  • hacking arch/arm64/kernel/crash_dump.c:copy_old_mempage() to see if crash system really starts. It does.
  • fun fact: retested with more reserved memory and with UEFI FW, host kernel crashes in init but directly starts the crash kernel, so it works (somehow) \o/

update HW25

• Day 1
  • rebased crash-kernel on v6.12.59 (for now), still crashing

---

Improve UML page fault handler by ptesarik

Description

Improve UML handling of segmentation faults in kernel mode. Although such page faults are generally caused by a kernel bug, it is annoying if they cause an infinite loop, or panic the kernel. More importantly, a robust implementation allows to write KUnit tests for various guard pages, preventing potential kernel self-protection regressions.

Goals

Convert the UML page fault handler to use oops_* helpers, go through a few review rounds and finally get my patch series merged in 6.14.

Resources

Wrong initial attempt: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231215121431.680-1-petrtesarik@huaweicloud.com/T/

---

Add Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (SM7250) basic device tree to mainline linux kernel by pvorel

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (SM7250) (smartphone SoC) has no support in the linux kernel, nor in u-boot. Try to add basic device tree support. The hardest part will be to create boot.img which will be accepted by phone.

UART is available for smartphone :).

---