Internal shared images repository
a project by ancorgs
Updated over 6 years ago. 5 hacker ♥️.

During the last CSM workshop we identified the need to have a good way to share the images we use for testing. We have documented the requirements and the current status in this wiki page (we even have a diagram).

So analysis is done... it's time for action. The solution should be relatively easy to implement using our portfolio of solutions. Coordinating all the potential users should be easier during Hackweek, specially since I'll be in Nuremberg (and I can physically chase most people ;-) ).

Join this project

Looking for hackers with the skills:

cloud testing infrastructure

This project is part of:

Hack Week 13

Activity

  • almost 10 years ago: mvidner liked this project.
  • almost 10 years ago: e_bischoff liked this project.
  • almost 10 years ago: ganglia liked this project.
  • about 10 years ago: kalabiyau liked this project.
  • about 10 years ago: ancorgs liked this project.
  • about 10 years ago: ancorgs added keyword "infrastructure" to this project.
  • about 10 years ago: ancorgs added keyword "cloud" to this project.
  • about 10 years ago: ancorgs added keyword "testing" to this project.
  • about 10 years ago: ancorgs started this project.
  • about 10 years ago: ancorgs originated this project.


    • Comments

    • ancorgs
      almost 10 years ago by ancorgs | Reply

      Cornelius, Eric Bischoff and myself had an interesting conversation about the approach to follow and the implementation options. We agreed to write a follow up at the wiki (see description for url).

    Similar Projects

    Create a Cloud-Native policy engine with notifying capabilities to optimize resource usage by gbazzotti

    Description

    The goal of this project is to begin the initial phase of development of an all-in-one Cloud-Native Policy Engine that notifies resource owners when their resources infringe predetermined policies. This was inspired by a current issue in the CES-SRE Team where other solutions seemed to not exactly correspond to the needs of the specific workloads running on the Public Cloud Team space.

    The initial architecture can be checked out on the Repository listed under Resources.

    Among the features that will differ this project from other monitoring/notification systems:

    • Pre-defined sensible policies written at the software-level, avoiding a learning curve by requiring users to write their own policies
    • All-in-one functionality: logging, mailing and all other actions are not required to install any additional plugins/packages
    • Easy account management, being able to parse all required configuration by a single JSON file
    • Eliminate integrations by not requiring metrics to go through a data-agreggator

    Goals

    • Create a minimal working prototype following the workflow specified on the documentation
    • Provide instructions on installation/usage
    • Work on email notifying capabilities

    Resources

    openQA tests needles elaboration using AI image recognition by mdati

    Description

    In the openQA test framework, to identify the status of a target SUT image, a screenshots of GUI or CLI-terminal images, the needles framework scans the many pictures in its repository, having associated a given set of tags (strings), selecting specific smaller parts of each available image. For the needles management actually we need to keep stored many screenshots, variants of GUI and CLI-terminal images, eachone accompanied by a dedicated set of data references (json).

    A smarter framework, using image recognition based on AI or other image elaborations tools, nowadays widely available, could improve the matching process and hopefully reduce time and errors, during the images verification and detection process.

    Goals

    Main scope of this idea is to match a non-text status of a running openQA test, an image of a shell console or application-GUI screenshot, using less time and resources and with less errors in data preparation and use, than the actual openQA needles framework; that is:

    • having a given SUT (system under test) GUI or CLI-terminal screenshot, with a local distribution of pixels or text commands related to a running test status,
    • we want to identify a desired target, e.g. a screen image status or data/commands context,
      • based on AI/ML-pretrained archives containing object or other proper elaboration tools,
      • possibly able to identify also object not present in the archive, i.e. by means of AI/ML mechanisms.
    • the matching result should be then adapted to continue working in the openQA test, likewise and in place of the same result that would have been produced by the original openQA needles framework.
    • We expect an improvement of the matching-time(less time), reliability of the expected result(less error) and simplification of archive maintenance in adding/removing objects(smaller DB and less actions).

    Hackweek step

    POC:

    • study the available tools
    • prepare a plan for the process to build
    • write and build a draft application
    • prepare the data archive from a subset of needles
    • initialize/pre-train the base archive
    • select a screenshot from the subset, removing/changing some part
    • run the POC application
    • expect the image type is identified in a good %.

    Resources

    first step of this project is quite identification of useful resources for the scope; some possibilities are:

    • SUSE AI and other ML tools (i.e. Tensorflow)
    • Tools able to manage images
    • RPA test tools (like i.e. Robot framework)
    • other.

    Testing and adding GNU/Linux distributions on Uyuni by juliogonzalezgil

    Join the Gitter channel! https://gitter.im/uyuni-project/hackweek

    Uyuni is a configuration and infrastructure management tool that saves you time and headaches when you have to manage and update tens, hundreds or even thousands of machines. It also manages configuration, can run audits, build image containers, monitor and much more!

    Currently there are a few distributions that are completely untested on Uyuni or SUSE Manager (AFAIK) or just not tested since a long time, and could be interesting knowing how hard would be working with them and, if possible, fix whatever is broken.

    For newcomers, the easiest distributions are those based on DEB or RPM packages. Distributions with other package formats are doable, but will require adapting the Python and Java code to be able to sync and analyze such packages (and if salt does not support those packages, it will need changes as well). So if you want a distribution with other packages, make sure you are comfortable handling such changes.

    No developer experience? No worries! We had non-developers contributors in the past, and we are ready to help as long as you are willing to learn. If you don't want to code at all, you can also help us preparing the documentation after someone else has the initial code ready, or you could also help with testing :-)

    The idea is testing Salt and Salt-ssh clients, but NOT traditional clients, which are deprecated.

    To consider that a distribution has basic support, we should cover at least (points 3-6 are to be tested for both salt minions and salt ssh minions):

    1. Reposync (this will require using spacewalk-common-channels and adding channels to the .ini file)
    2. Onboarding (salt minion from UI, salt minion from bootstrap scritp, and salt-ssh minion) (this will probably require adding OS to the bootstrap repository creator)
    3. Package management (install, remove, update...)
    4. Patching
    5. Applying any basic salt state (including a formula)
    6. Salt remote commands
    7. Bonus point: Java part for product identification, and monitoring enablement
    8. Bonus point: sumaform enablement (https://github.com/uyuni-project/sumaform)
    9. Bonus point: Documentation (https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni-docs)
    10. Bonus point: testsuite enablement (https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/tree/master/testsuite)

    If something is breaking: we can try to fix it, but the main idea is research how supported it is right now. Beyond that it's up to each project member how much to hack :-)

    • If you don't have knowledge about some of the steps: ask the team
    • If you still don't know what to do: switch to another distribution and keep testing.

    This card is for EVERYONE, not just developers. Seriously! We had people from other teams helping that were not developers, and added support for Debian and new SUSE Linux Enterprise and openSUSE Leap versions :-)

    Pending

    Debian 13

    The new version of the beloved Debian GNU/Linux OS

    Seems to be a Debian 12 derivative, so adding it could be quite easy.

    • [ ] Reposync (this will require using spacewalk-common-channels and adding channels to the .ini file)
    • W] Onboarding (salt minion from UI, salt minion from bootstrap script, and salt-ssh minion) (this will probably require adding OS to the bootstrap repository creator)
    • [ ] Package management (install, remove, update...)
    • [ ] Patching (if patch information is available, could require writing some code to parse it, but IIRC we have support for Ubuntu already). Probably not for Debian as IIRC we don't support patches yet.
    • [ ] Applying any basic salt state (including a formula)
    • [ ] Salt remote commands
    • [ ] Bonus point: Java part for product identification, and monitoring enablement
    • [ ] Bonus point: sumaform enablement (https://github.com/uyuni-project/sumaform)
    • [ ] Bonus point: Documentation (https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni-docs)

    Multimachine on-prem test with opentofu, ansible and Robot Framework by apappas

    Description

    A long time ago I explored using the Robot Framework for testing. A big deficiency over our openQA setup is that bringing up and configuring the connection to a test machine is out of scope.

    Nowadays we have a way¹ to deploy SUTs outside openqa, but we only use if for cloud tests in conjuction with openqa. Using knowledge gained from that project I am going to try to create a test scenario that replicates an openqa test but this time including the deployment and setup of the SUT.

    Goals

    Create a simple multimachine test scenario with the support server and SUT all created by the robot framework.

    Resources

    1. https://github.com/SUSE/qe-sap-deployment
    2. terraform-libvirt-provider