Automate testing for openSCAP / ComplianceAsCode with CI or openQA
Project Description
Our current workflow for contributing to compliance as code requires manual testing. Automated testing either through the upstream CI or openQA would lower development time.
Goal for this Hackweek
- Working prototype for OpenQA testing (hard, but openQA is awesome) OR
- Testing for SLES on the upstream CI (probably easier, but needs cooperation from upstream)
Resources
No Hackers yet
Looking for hackers with the skills:
This project is part of:
Hack Week 22
Activity
Comments
Be the first to comment!
Similar Projects
Make more sense of openQA test results using AI by livdywan
Description
AI has the potential to help with something many of us spend a lot of time doing which is making sense of openQA logs when a job fails.
User Story
Allison Average has a puzzled look on their face while staring at log files that seem to make little sense. Is this a known issue, something completely new or maybe related to infrastructure changes?
Goals
- Leverage a chat interface to help Allison
- Create a model from scratch based on data from openQA
- Proof of concept for automated analysis of openQA test results
Bonus
- Use AI to suggest solutions to merge conflicts
- This would need a merge conflict editor that can suggest solving the conflict
- Use image recognition for needles
Resources
Timeline
Day 1
- Conversing with open-webui to teach me how to create a model based on openQA test results
- Asking for example code using TensorFlow in Python
- Discussing log files to explore what to analyze
- Drafting a new project called Testimony (based on Implementing a containerized Python action) - the project name was also suggested by the assistant
Day 2
- Using NotebookLLM (Gemini) to produce conversational versions of blog posts
- Researching the possibility of creating a project logo with AI
- Asking open-webui, persons with prior experience and conducting a web search for advice
Highlights
- I briefly tested compared models to see if they would make me more productive. Between llama, gemma and mistral there was no amazing difference in the results for my case.
- Convincing the chat interface to produce code specific to my use case required very explicit instructions.
- Asking for advice on how to use open-webui itself better was frustratingly unfruitful both in trivial and more advanced regards.
- Documentation on source materials used by LLM's and tools for this purpose seems virtually non-existent - specifically if a logo can be generated based on particular licenses
Outcomes
- Chat interface-supported development is providing good starting points and open-webui being open source is more flexible than Gemini. Although currently some fancy features such as grounding and generated podcasts are missing.
- Allison still has to be very experienced with openQA to use a chat interface for test review. Publicly available system prompts would make that easier, though.
New features in openqa-trigger-from-obs for openQA by jlausuch
Description
Implement new features in openqa-trigger-from-obs to make xml more flexible.
Goals
One of the features to be implemented: - Possibility to define "VERSION" and "ARCH" variables per flavor instead of global.
Resources
https://github.com/os-autoinst/openqa-trigger-from-obs
Setup a new openQA on more powerful server by JNa
Description
- currently local openQA storage is insufficient
Goals
-Migrate to more powerful machine
Resources
-Service Rainbow
Hack on isotest-ng - a rust port of isotovideo (os-autoinst aka testrunner of openQA) by szarate
Description
Some time ago, I managed to convince ByteOtter to hack something that resembles isotovideo but in Rust, not because I believe that Perl is dead, but more because there are certain limitations in the perl code (how it was written), and its always hard to add new functionalities when they are about implementing a new backend, or fixing bugs (Along with people complaining that Perl is dead, and that they don't like it)
In reality, I wanted to see if this could be done, and ByteOtter proved that it could be, while doing an amazing job at hacking a vnc console, and helping me understand better what RuPerl needs to work.
I plan to keep working on this for the next few years, and while I don't aim for feature completion or replacing isotovideo tih isotest-ng (name in progress), I do plan to be able to use it on a daily basis, using specialized tooling with interfaces, instead of reimplementing everything in the backend
Todo
- Add
maketargets for testability, e.g "spawn qemu and type" - Add image search matching algorithm
- Add a Null test distribution provider
- Add a Perl Test Distribution Provider
- Fix unittests https://github.com/os-autoinst/isotest-ng/issues/5
- Research OpenTofu how to add new hypervisors/baremetal to OpenTofu
- Add an interface to openQA cli
Goals
- Implement at least one of the above, prepare proposals for GSoC
- Boot a system via it's BMC
Resources
See https://github.com/os-autoinst/isotest-ng
OpenQA Golang api client by hilchev
Description
I would like to make a simple cli tool to communicate with the OpenQA API
Goals
- OpenQA has a ton of information that is hard to get via the UI. A tool like this would make my life easier :)
- Would potentially make it easier in the future to make UI changes without Perl.
- Improve my Golang skills
Resources
- https://go.dev/doc/
- https://openqa.opensuse.org/api
Automate PR process by idplscalabrini
Description
This project is to streamline and enhance the pr review process by adding automation for identifying some issues like missing comments, identifying sensitive information in the PRs like credentials. etc. By leveraging GitHub Actions and golang hooks we can focus more on high-level reviews
Goals
- Automate lints and code validations on Github actions
- Automate code validation on hook
- Implement a bot to pre-review the PRs
Resources
Golang hooks and Github actions