In case any of the source files changed, openSUSE Build Service rebuilds the dependent packages regardless of whether that particular modification affects the dependency. This makes our resources footprint bigger (and the electrical power bills higher). It also affects users, because every new package build causes the package manager to include that package in the next update thus consuming network bandwidth and resources of users' computers.
Current OBS controls for package rebuild triggers
It is possible to control dependent packages build triggers on a per repository basis (see OBS build scheduling strategies). You will find an explanation on that page that any setting other than the default, which is "always rebuild", is not safe and should not be used if the packages are to be distributed. Apparently, the concern is more of a "this repository is official/testing" kind.
Which modifications justify rebuilding
First, we need to define the modifications which justify rebuilding the dependencies. This is a list which should be amended by the more knowledgeable on software builds:
new library versions or binary API changes (the latter should always cause the former?)
changes in
#includes
files (in case of library development packages); it is preferable to verify if the dependencies can build with these modifications sooner rather than later
Possible improvements
Extend the checkin
command
I suppose that this is a hard problem to solve automatically, so it is good to start small with some infrastructure to allow managing the dependencies rebuild process. We could add the "don't rebuild/must rebuild dependencies" option to the checkin command.
Make builds reproducible
There are ongoing efforts to get reproducible builds, that is if the source has not changed, then the built package should be exactly equal to the previous build too.
According to osc triggerreason
on several packages in the openSUSE Build Service reference instance, quite a few rebuilds were due to md5 sum not matching. If more builds were reproducible that would obviously reduce the total number of builds. More, a reproducible build would (almost) completely remove transitive builds (see the build
project attribute).
See the following pages for more information:
Reproducible builds in Fedora (security reasons are discussed more)
Questions
Is there a facility in OBS similar to the Debian's
dh_buildinfo
? Would that be useful in OBS? Is there a way to keep that information within the existing infrastructure?How are md5 sums produced?
Resources
osc triggerreason --help
osc jobhistory --help
Looking for hackers with the skills:
This project is part of:
Hack Week 10 Hack Week 11
Activity
Comments
Similar Projects
Testing and adding GNU/Linux distributions on Uyuni by juliogonzalezgil
Join the Gitter channel! https://gitter.im/uyuni-project/hackweek
Uyuni is a configuration and infrastructure management tool that saves you time and headaches when you have to manage and update tens, hundreds or even thousands of machines. It also manages configuration, can run audits, build image containers, monitor and much more!
Currently there are a few distributions that are completely untested on Uyuni or SUSE Manager (AFAIK) or just not tested since a long time, and could be interesting knowing how hard would be working with them and, if possible, fix whatever is broken.
For newcomers, the easiest distributions are those based on DEB or RPM packages. Distributions with other package formats are doable, but will require adapting the Python and Java code to be able to sync and analyze such packages (and if salt does not support those packages, it will need changes as well). So if you want a distribution with other packages, make sure you are comfortable handling such changes.
No developer experience? No worries! We had non-developers contributors in the past, and we are ready to help as long as you are willing to learn. If you don't want to code at all, you can also help us preparing the documentation after someone else has the initial code ready, or you could also help with testing :-)
The idea is testing Salt and Salt-ssh clients, but NOT traditional clients, which are deprecated.
To consider that a distribution has basic support, we should cover at least (points 3-6 are to be tested for both salt minions and salt ssh minions):
- Reposync (this will require using spacewalk-common-channels and adding channels to the .ini file)
- Onboarding (salt minion from UI, salt minion from bootstrap scritp, and salt-ssh minion) (this will probably require adding OS to the bootstrap repository creator)
- Package management (install, remove, update...)
- Patching
- Applying any basic salt state (including a formula)
- Salt remote commands
- Bonus point: Java part for product identification, and monitoring enablement
- Bonus point: sumaform enablement (https://github.com/uyuni-project/sumaform)
- Bonus point: Documentation (https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni-docs)
- Bonus point: testsuite enablement (https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/tree/master/testsuite)
If something is breaking: we can try to fix it, but the main idea is research how supported it is right now. Beyond that it's up to each project member how much to hack :-)
- If you don't have knowledge about some of the steps: ask the team
- If you still don't know what to do: switch to another distribution and keep testing.
This card is for EVERYONE, not just developers. Seriously! We had people from other teams helping that were not developers, and added support for Debian and new SUSE Linux Enterprise and openSUSE Leap versions :-)
Pending
FUSS
FUSS is a complete GNU/Linux solution (server, client and desktop/standalone) based on Debian for managing an educational network.
https://fuss.bz.it/
Seems to be a Debian 12 derivative, so adding it could be quite easy.
[W]
Reposync (this will require using spacewalk-common-channels and adding channels to the .ini file)[W]
Onboarding (salt minion from UI, salt minion from bootstrap script, and salt-ssh minion) (this will probably require adding OS to the bootstrap repository creator) --> Working for all 3 options (salt minion UI, salt minion bootstrap script and salt-ssh minion from the UI).[W]
Package management (install, remove, update...) --> Installing a new package works, needs to test the rest.[I]
Patching (if patch information is available, could require writing some code to parse it, but IIRC we have support for Ubuntu already). No patches detected. Do we support patches for Debian at all?[W]
Applying any basic salt state (including a formula)[W]
Salt remote commands[ ]
Bonus point: Java part for product identification, and monitoring enablement
New features in openqa-trigger-from-obs for openQA by jlausuch
Description
Implement new features in openqa-trigger-from-obs to make xml more flexible.
Goals
One of the features to be implemented: - Possibility to define "VERSION" and "ARCH" variables per flavor instead of global.
Resources
https://github.com/os-autoinst/openqa-trigger-from-obs
Switch software-o-o to parse repomd data by hennevogel
Currently software.opensuse.org search is using the OBS binary search for everything, even for packages inside the openSUSE distributions. Let's switch this to use repomd data from download.opensuse.org
obs-service-vendor_node_modules by cdimonaco
Description
When building a javascript package for obs, one option is to use https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-node_modules as source service to get the project npm dependencies available for package bulding.
obs-service-vendornodemodules aims to be a source service that vendors npm dependencies, installing them with npm install (optionally only production ones) and then creating a tar package of the installed dependencies.
The tar will be used as source in the package building definitions.
Goals
- Create an obs service package that vendors the npm dependencies as tar archive.
- Maybe add some macros to unpack the vendor package in the specfiles
Resources
Automation of ABI compatibility checks by ateixeira
Description
ABI compatibility checks could be further automated by using the OBS API to download built RPMs and using existing tools to analyze ABI compatibility between the libraries contained in those packages. This project aims to explore these possibilities and figure out a way to make ABI checks as painless and fast as possible for package maintainers.
Resources
https://github.com/openSUSE/abi-compliance-checker
https://github.com/lvc/abi-compliance-checker
https://sourceware.org/libabigail/
Create object oriented API for perl's YAML::XS module, with YAML 1.2 Support by tinita
Description
YAML::XS is a binding to libyaml and already quite old, but the most popular YAML module for perl. There are two main issues:
- It uses global package variables to influence behaviour.
- It didn't implement the loading of types like numbers and booleans according to the YAML spec (neither 1.1 nor 1.2).
Goals
Create a new interface which works object oriented. Currently YAML::XS exports a list of functions.
- The new API will allow to create a YAML::XS object containing configuration influencing the behaviour of loading and dumping.
- It keeps the libyaml parser and emitter structs in memory, so repeated calls can save the creation of those structs
- It will by default implement the YAML 1.2 Core Schema, so it is compatible to other YAML processors in perl and in other languages
- If I have time, I would like to add the merge
<<
key feature as an option. We could then use it in openQA as a replacement for YAML::PP to be faster.
I already created a proof of concept with a minimal functionality some weeks before this HackWeek.
Resources
- Work is currently happening on the oop branch
- Experimental release waiting for user feedback: https://github.com/perlpunk/yaml-libyaml-pm/releases
- Diff