an invention by psimons
We need statistical analysis and key performance indicators to describe the lifetime of maintenance and release requests in IBS, for example:
How long does an update take starting from the time the first maintenance request is created and stopping at the time the update is released to customers?
How long does it take for a maintenance request to pass all required reviews?
How often do reviews succeed or fail, respectively?
How long does it take to create a release request after a maintenance incident has been created?
How do these values look, on average, across different code streams?
What is the absolute number of requests opened (or closed) in a given time period (per code stream)?
This information is particularly important for the Emergency Updater Team, which defines success and failure partly through the time it takes to release an update to customers.
Almost all of that information is available in IBS (OBS) in one way or another, but it is hard to retrieve the data in a format that's easy to analyze.
The aim of this Hackweek project is to remedy that issue by writing one or several tools that query IBS/OBS and generate a relational database in Sqlite3 or MySQL that contains all necessary information for further analysis with standard tools, like R, scripting languages, or spread sheets in a simple format (schema). The focus of this effort would be to support build.suse.de (IBS), but we assume that supporting build.opensuse.org (OBS) as well will be feasible, if not even trivial.
There is a relevant FATE issue at https://fate.suse.com/319971 that we'll need to take into consideration.
This project was initially discussed during the MaintSec 2016 workshop, and most of the original notes are still available at https://etherpad.nue.suse.com/p/TeamSaturn. Since then, some research and experimentation has taken place under the umbrella of https://redmine.nue.suse.com/issues/5785 and https://redmine.nue.suse.com/issues/4276.
Looking for hackers with the skills:
This project is part of:
Hack Week 15
Activity
Comments
-
almost 8 years ago by hennevogel | Reply
Nice project! You are aware that the BS-Team has implemented the data gathering part of this feature? It's not yet in production but it's on the way -> Pull Request #2507
BTW if you want to do this inside the OBS and not with an external tool I would be interested in introducing you to OBS development and helping you during hackweek. Let me know :-)
-
almost 8 years ago by leonardocf | Reply
You might find https://gitlab.suse.de/maintenance/pymaint useful
Similar Projects
Explore the integration between OBS and GitHub by pdostal
Project Description
The goals:
1) When GitHub pull request is created or modified the OBS project will be forked and the build results reported back to GitHub. 2) When new version of the GitHub project will be published the OBS will redownload the source and rebuild the project.
Goal for this Hackweek
Do as much as possible, blog about it and maybe use it another existing project.
Resources
- The Blog post
- Issue: poo#123858 - build.opensuse.org: /usr/lib/obs/service//go_modules.service No such file or directory
Switch software-o-o to parse repomd data by hennevogel
Currently software.opensuse.org search is using the OBS binary search for everything, even for packages inside the openSUSE distributions. Let's switch this to use repomd data from download.opensuse.org
Automation of ABI compatibility checks by ateixeira
Description
ABI compatibility checks could be further automated by using the OBS API to download built RPMs and using existing tools to analyze ABI compatibility between the libraries contained in those packages. This project aims to explore these possibilities and figure out a way to make ABI checks as painless and fast as possible for package maintainers.
Resources
https://github.com/openSUSE/abi-compliance-checker
https://github.com/lvc/abi-compliance-checker
https://sourceware.org/libabigail/
New features in openqa-trigger-from-obs for openQA by jlausuch
Description
Implement new features in openqa-trigger-from-obs to make xml more flexible.
Goals
One of the features to be implemented: - Possibility to define "VERSION" and "ARCH" variables per flavor instead of global.
Resources
https://github.com/os-autoinst/openqa-trigger-from-obs
Bootstrap openSUSE on LoongArch by glaubitz
Description
LoongArch is a new architecture from China which has its roots in the MIPS architecture. It has been created by Loongson and is already supported by Debian Ports, Gentoo and Loongnix.
Upstream support for LoongArch is already quite complete which includes LLVM, Rust, Golang, GRUB, QEMU, LibreOffice and many more. In Debian Ports, where the port is called "loong64", more than 95% of the whole Debian archive have been successfully built for LoongArch.
QEMU support is rather complete and stable such that packages can be built in emulated environments. Hardware can also be requested by Loongson on request for free. Access to real hardware is also provided through the GCC Compile Farm.
Goals
The initial goal should be to add LoongArch to OBS and build a minimal set of packages.
Resources
- Introduction to LoongArch: https://docs.kernel.org/arch/loongarch/introduction.html
- LoongArch community on Github: https://github.com/loongarchlinux
- Debian Ports repository for loong64: http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports/pool-loong64/main/
- Gentoo stage3 for loong: https://www.gentoo.org/downloads/#loong
Results
- An initial set of packages for openSUSE loongarch64 has been successfully bootstrapped
- An OBS project has been set up to build packages for openSUSE loongarch64 with more than 3000 packages being built already
- A work-in-progress guide on how to bootstrap a new openSUSE port from Debian has been created
- A work-in-progress guide on how to add a new target to the openSUSE toolchain has been created
Acknowledgements
- Thanks to Adrian Schröter and Rüdiger Oertl for the help with setting up the FTP space and OBS project
- Thanks to Dirk Müller for the input on how to get started with a new port
- Thanks to Richard Biener for quickly accepting my submit requests to add loongarch64 support to the toolchain