Project Description

Legal reviews have been a quite painful part of our development process. The current situation in Factory waits for legaldb for a limited amount of time and simply proceeds further if the review is not "approved" within a few hours.

Leap currently waits for legal review to be closed (may take weeks), or manually skipped. We typically contact our legal with ask to review specific requests on a weekly basis.

The goal is to improve our best effort on reviews in openSUSE, and ideally "shorten" the time of legal review of our packages.

Project OSSelot and related work on legal reviews seem to be funded by donations to OSADL (based in Germany). The project seems to use fossology underneath.

I highly recomemnd to start by watching OSSelot videos to get some idea about how their process and results look like. The last one seems to be closest to what I've seen in the Open Chain webinar.

GitHub repository of curated data

This project has two parts. Offloading our legal team, where possible, and contributing back.

Goal for this Hackweek

  • Contributing back results of our reviews Being a good Open Source Community Citizen and publicly sharing results of our legal reviews of community packages.

  • Offloading reviews of our community packages. There I can see extension of our existing current process. And extending our legal bot to talk to fossology/OSSelot.

An example could be Let's wait for legaldb for n-hours (currently 1-2h), if the review is still open then let's submit it to OSSelot. I see it as a much better alternative to e.g. lkocman skipping the review and taking the change in, in case that review was not closed for days/weeks.

Resources

  • We could use somebody who has experience with our legal tooling https://github.com/openSUSE/cavil and could help us export data from legaldb.suse.de to https://github.com/Open-Source-Compliance](https://github.com/Open-Source-Compliance/package-analysis/tree/main/analysed-packages)

  • A person who could tweak our existing legal bot to submit requests to fossology/osselot

Looking for hackers with the skills:

legal perl python osc obs cavil github spdx

This project is part of:

Hack Week 22

Activity

  • almost 3 years ago: lkocman started this project.
  • almost 3 years ago: hennevogel liked this project.
  • almost 3 years ago: jzerebecki liked this project.
  • almost 3 years ago: lkocman added keyword "spdx" to this project.
  • almost 3 years ago: lkocman added keyword "legal" to this project.
  • almost 3 years ago: lkocman added keyword "perl" to this project.
  • almost 3 years ago: lkocman added keyword "python" to this project.
  • almost 3 years ago: lkocman added keyword "osc" to this project.
  • almost 3 years ago: lkocman added keyword "obs" to this project.
  • almost 3 years ago: lkocman added keyword "cavil" to this project.
  • almost 3 years ago: lkocman added keyword "github" to this project.
  • almost 3 years ago: kraih liked this project.
  • almost 3 years ago: lkocman liked this project.
  • almost 3 years ago: lkocman originated this project.

  • Comments

    • lkocman
      almost 3 years ago by lkocman | Reply

      ** An agreed first step from our call with Christopher from our legal team would be to compare our cavil report with the fossology report. Sebastian and Christopher recommended to start with comparing results of openssl**

      I'd recommend filing an OSSelot project issue containing our review data (perhaps stripped from the SUSE's RISK assestment) and have a discussion about next steps.

      *Notes: *

      What's interesting for us is the SPDX license mapping to files, we're still using mappings from before the spdx time. What's interesting to our SUSE legal is what are the criteria for rejection on the OSSelot side. I did ask and we do not have any "strategy" or "rules" rejection documented publically.

      I'm not sure if OSSelot team would be willing to work on our reviews to the level that we'd expect (to be clarified, see my note about rejection above), but having these reports public e.g. in a pull request, opens a way for volunteers with legal license background to contribute and offload SUSE legal team on community reviews.

    • lkocman
      almost 3 years ago by lkocman | Reply

      Another action item from Sebastian:

      One more thing for hack week, you could take a look at a rejected review, maybe there is something they have in their data that matches (search https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/recent for unacceptable)

      There were 11 rejected reviews in the past 3 months

    Similar Projects

    MCP Perl SDK by kraih

    Description

    We've been using the MCP Perl SDK to connect openQA with AI. And while the basics are working pretty well, the SDK is not fully spec compliant yet. So let's change that!

    Goals

    • Support for Resources
    • All response types (Audio, Resource Links, Embedded Resources...)
    • Tool/Prompt/Resource update notifications
    • Dynamic Tool/Prompt/Resource lists
    • New authentication mechanisms

    Resources


    Create a page with all devel:languages:perl packages and their versions by tinita

    Description

    Perl projects now live in git: https://src.opensuse.org/perl

    It would be useful to have an easy way to check which version of which perl module is in devel:languages:perl. Also we have meta overrides and patches for various modules, and it would be good to have them at a central place, so it is easier to lookup, and we can share with other vendors.

    I did some initial data dump here a while ago: https://github.com/perlpunk/cpan-meta

    But I never had the time to automate this.

    I can also use the data to check if there are necessary updates (currently it uses data from download.opensuse.org, so there is some delay and it depends on building).

    Goals

    • Have a script that updates a central repository (e.g. https://src.opensuse.org/perl/_metadata) with metadata by looking at https://src.opensuse.org/perl/_ObsPrj (check if there are any changes from the last run)
    • Create a HTML page with the list of packages (use Javascript and some table library to make it easily searchable)

    Resources

    Results

    Day 1

    Day 2

    • HTML Page has now links to src.opensuse.org and the date of the last update, plus a short info at the top
    • Code is now 100% covered by tests: https://app.codecov.io/gh/perlpunk/opensuse-perl-meta
    • I used the modern perl class feature, which makes perl classes even nicer and shorter. See example
    • Tests
      • I tried out the mocking feature of the modern Test2::V0 library which provides call tracking. See example
      • I tried out comparing data structures with the new Test2::V0 library. It let's you compare parts of the structure with the like function, which only compares the date that is mentioned in the expected data. example

    Day 3

    • Added various things to the table
      • Dependencies column
      • Show popup with info for cpanspec, patches and dependencies
      • Added last date / commit to the data export.

    Plan: With the added date / commit we can now daily check _ObsPrj for changes and only fetch the data for changed packages.

    Day 4


    Improvements to osc (especially with regards to the Git workflow) by mcepl

    Description

    There is plenty of hacking on osc, where we could spent some fun time. I would like to see a solution for https://github.com/openSUSE/osc/issues/2006 (which is sufficiently non-serious, that it could be part of HackWeek project).


    Song Search with CLAP by gcolangiuli

    Description

    Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining (CLAP) is an open-source library that enables the training of a neural network on both Audio and Text descriptions, making it possible to search for Audio using a Text input. Several pre-trained models for song search are already available on huggingface

    SUSE Hackweek AI Song Search

    Goals

    Evaluate how CLAP can be used for song searching and determine which types of queries yield the best results by developing a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) in Python. Based on the results of this MVP, future steps could include:

    • Music Tagging;
    • Free text search;
    • Integration with an LLM (for example, with MCP or the OpenAI API) for music suggestions based on your own library.

    The code for this project will be entirely written using AI to better explore and demonstrate AI capabilities.

    Result

    In this MVP we implemented:

    • Async Song Analysis with Clap model
    • Free Text Search of the songs
    • Similar song search based on vector representation
    • Containerised version with web interface

    We also documented what went well and what can be improved in the use of AI.

    You can have a look at the result here:

    Future implementation can be related to performance improvement and stability of the analysis.

    References


    Enhance git-sha-verify: A tool to checkout validated git hashes by gpathak

    Description

    git-sha-verify is a simple shell utility to verify and checkout trusted git commits signed using GPG key. This tool helps ensure that only authorized or validated commit hashes are checked out from a git repository, supporting better code integrity and security within the workflow.

    Supports:

    • Verifying commit authenticity signed using gpg key
    • Checking out trusted commits

    Ideal for teams and projects where the integrity of git history is crucial.

    Goals

    A minimal python code of the shell script exists as a pull request.

    The goal of this hackweek is to:

    • DONE: Add more unit tests
      • New and more tests can be added later
    • Partially DONE: Make the python code modular
    • DONE: Add code coverage if possible

    Resources


    Help Create A Chat Control Resistant Turnkey Chatmail/Deltachat Relay Stack - Rootless Podman Compose, OpenSUSE BCI, Hardened, & SELinux by 3nd5h1771fy

    Description

    The Mission: Decentralized & Sovereign Messaging

    FYI: If you have never heard of "Chatmail", you can visit their site here, but simply put it can be thought of as the underlying protocol/platform decentralized messengers like DeltaChat use for their communications. Do not confuse it with the honeypot looking non-opensource paid for prodect with better seo that directs you to chatmailsecure(dot)com

    In an era of increasing centralized surveillance by unaccountable bad actors (aka BigTech), "Chat Control," and the erosion of digital privacy, the need for sovereign communication infrastructure is critical. Chatmail is a pioneering initiative that bridges the gap between classic email and modern instant messaging, offering metadata-minimized, end-to-end encrypted (E2EE) communication that is interoperable and open.

    However, unless you are a seasoned sysadmin, the current recommended deployment method of a Chatmail relay is rigid, fragile, difficult to properly secure, and effectively takes over the entire host the "relay" is deployed on.

    Why This Matters

    A simple, host agnostic, reproducible deployment lowers the entry cost for anyone wanting to run a privacy‑preserving, decentralized messaging relay. In an era of perpetually resurrected chat‑control legislation threats, EU digital‑sovereignty drives, and many dangers of using big‑tech messaging platforms (Apple iMessage, WhatsApp, FB Messenger, Instagram, SMS, Google Messages, etc...) for any type of communication, providing an easy‑to‑use alternative empowers:

    • Censorship resistance - No single entity controls the relay; operators can spin up new nodes quickly.
    • Surveillance mitigation - End‑to‑end OpenPGP encryption ensures relay operators never see plaintext.
    • Digital sovereignty - Communities can host their own infrastructure under local jurisdiction, aligning with national data‑policy goals.

    By turning the Chatmail relay into a plug‑and‑play container stack, we enable broader adoption, foster a resilient messaging fabric, and give developers, activists, and hobbyists a concrete tool to defend privacy online.

    Goals

    As I indicated earlier, this project aims to drastically simplify the deployment of Chatmail relay. By converting this architecture into a portable, containerized stack using Podman and OpenSUSE base container images, we can allow anyone to deploy their own censorship-resistant, privacy-preserving communications node in minutes.

    Our goal for Hack Week: package every component into containers built on openSUSE/MicroOS base images, initially orchestrated with a single container-compose.yml (podman-compose compatible). The stack will:

    • Run on any host that supports Podman (including optimizations and enhancements for SELinux‑enabled systems).
    • Allow network decoupling by refactoring configurations to move from file-system constrained Unix sockets to internal TCP networking, allowing containers achieve stricter isolation.
    • Utilize Enhanced Security with SELinux by using purpose built utilities such as udica we can quickly generate custom SELinux policies for the container stack, ensuring strict confinement superior to standard/typical Docker deployments.
    • Allow the use of bind or remote mounted volumes for shared data (/var/vmail, DKIM keys, TLS certs, etc.).
    • Replace the local DNS server requirement with a remote DNS‑provider API for DKIM/TXT record publishing.

    By delivering a turnkey, host agnostic, reproducible deployment, we lower the barrier for individuals and small communities to launch their own chatmail relays, fostering a decentralized, censorship‑resistant messaging ecosystem that can serve DeltaChat users and/or future services adopting this protocol

    Resources


    Collection and organisation of information about Bulgarian schools by iivanov

    Description

    To achieve this it will be necessary:

    • Collect/download raw data from various government and non-governmental organizations
    • Clean up raw data and organise it in some kind database.
    • Create tool to make queries easy.
    • Or perhaps dump all data into AI and ask questions in natural language.

    Goals

    By selecting particular school information like this will be provided:

    • School scores on national exams.
    • School scores from the external evaluations exams.
    • School town, municipality and region.
    • Employment rate in a town or municipality.
    • Average health of the population in the region.

    Resources

    Some of these are available only in bulgarian.

    • https://danybon.com/klasazia
    • https://nvoresults.com/index.html
    • https://ri.mon.bg/active-institutions
    • https://www.nsi.bg/nrnm/ekatte/archive


    Improvements to osc (especially with regards to the Git workflow) by mcepl

    Description

    There is plenty of hacking on osc, where we could spent some fun time. I would like to see a solution for https://github.com/openSUSE/osc/issues/2006 (which is sufficiently non-serious, that it could be part of HackWeek project).


    Improvements to osc (especially with regards to the Git workflow) by mcepl

    Description

    There is plenty of hacking on osc, where we could spent some fun time. I would like to see a solution for https://github.com/openSUSE/osc/issues/2006 (which is sufficiently non-serious, that it could be part of HackWeek project).


    Testing and adding GNU/Linux distributions on Uyuni by juliogonzalezgil

    Join the Gitter channel! https://gitter.im/uyuni-project/hackweek

    Uyuni is a configuration and infrastructure management tool that saves you time and headaches when you have to manage and update tens, hundreds or even thousands of machines. It also manages configuration, can run audits, build image containers, monitor and much more!

    Currently there are a few distributions that are completely untested on Uyuni or SUSE Manager (AFAIK) or just not tested since a long time, and could be interesting knowing how hard would be working with them and, if possible, fix whatever is broken.

    For newcomers, the easiest distributions are those based on DEB or RPM packages. Distributions with other package formats are doable, but will require adapting the Python and Java code to be able to sync and analyze such packages (and if salt does not support those packages, it will need changes as well). So if you want a distribution with other packages, make sure you are comfortable handling such changes.

    No developer experience? No worries! We had non-developers contributors in the past, and we are ready to help as long as you are willing to learn. If you don't want to code at all, you can also help us preparing the documentation after someone else has the initial code ready, or you could also help with testing :-)

    The idea is testing Salt (including bootstrapping with bootstrap script) and Salt-ssh clients

    To consider that a distribution has basic support, we should cover at least (points 3-6 are to be tested for both salt minions and salt ssh minions):

    1. Reposync (this will require using spacewalk-common-channels and adding channels to the .ini file)
    2. Onboarding (salt minion from UI, salt minion from bootstrap scritp, and salt-ssh minion) (this will probably require adding OS to the bootstrap repository creator)
    3. Package management (install, remove, update...)
    4. Patching
    5. Applying any basic salt state (including a formula)
    6. Salt remote commands
    7. Bonus point: Java part for product identification, and monitoring enablement
    8. Bonus point: sumaform enablement (https://github.com/uyuni-project/sumaform)
    9. Bonus point: Documentation (https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni-docs)
    10. Bonus point: testsuite enablement (https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/tree/master/testsuite)

    If something is breaking: we can try to fix it, but the main idea is research how supported it is right now. Beyond that it's up to each project member how much to hack :-)

    • If you don't have knowledge about some of the steps: ask the team
    • If you still don't know what to do: switch to another distribution and keep testing.

    This card is for EVERYONE, not just developers. Seriously! We had people from other teams helping that were not developers, and added support for Debian and new SUSE Linux Enterprise and openSUSE Leap versions :-)

    In progress/done for Hack Week 25

    Guide

    We started writin a Guide: Adding a new client GNU Linux distribution to Uyuni at https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/wiki/Guide:-Adding-a-new-client-GNU-Linux-distribution-to-Uyuni, to make things easier for everyone, specially those not too familiar wht Uyuni or not technical.

    openSUSE Leap 16.0

    The distribution will all love!

    https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Roadmap#DRAFTScheduleforLeap16.0

    Curent Status We started last year, it's complete now for Hack Week 25! :-D

    • [W] Reposync (this will require using spacewalk-common-channels and adding channels to the .ini file) NOTE: Done, client tools for SLMicro6 are using as those for SLE16.0/openSUSE Leap 16.0 are not available yet
    • [W] Onboarding (salt minion from UI, salt minion from bootstrap scritp, and salt-ssh minion) (this will probably require adding OS to the bootstrap repository creator)
    • [W] Package management (install, remove, update...). Works, even reboot requirement detection


    Try out Neovim Plugins supporting AI Providers by enavarro_suse

    Description

    Experiment with several Neovim plugins that integrate AI model providers such as Gemini and Ollama.

    Goals

    Evaluate how these plugins enhance the development workflow, how they differ in capabilities, and how smoothly they integrate into Neovim for day-to-day coding tasks.

    Resources


    Switch software-o-o to store repomd in a database by hennevogel

    Description

    The openSUSE Software portal is a web app to explore binary packages of openSUSE distributions. Kind of like an package manager / app store.

    https://software.opensuse.org/

    This app has been around forever (August 2007) and it's architecture is a bit brittle. It acts as a frontend to the OBS distributions and published binary search APIs, calculates and caches a lot of stuff in memory and needs code changes nearly every openSUSE release to keep up.

    As you can imagine, it's a heavy user of the OBS API, especially when caches are cold.

    Goals

    I want to change the app to cache repomod data in a (postgres) database structure

    • Distributions have many Repositories
    • Repositories have many Packages
    • Packages have many Patches

    The UI workflows will be as following

    • As an admin I setup Distribution and it's repositories
    • As an admin I sync all repositories repomd files into to the database
    • As a user I browse a Distribution by category
    • As a user I search for Package of a Distribution in it's Repositories
    • As a user I extend the search to Package build on OBS for this Distribution

    This has a couple of pro's:

    • Less traffic on the OBS API as the usual Packages are inside the database
    • Easier base to add features to this page. Like comments, ratings, openSUSE specific screenshots etc.
    • Separating the Distribution package search from searching through OBS will hopefully make more clear for newbies that enabling extra repositories is kind of dangerous.

    And one con:

    • You can't search for packages build for foreign distributions with this app anymore (although we could consume their repomd etc. but I doubt we have the audience on an opensuse.org domain...)

    TODO

    • add-emoji Introduce a PG database
    • add-emoji Add clockworkd as scheduler and delayed_job as ActiveJob backend
    • add-emoji Introduce ActiveStorage
    • add-emoji Build initial data model
    • add-emoji Introduce repomd to database sync
      • add-emoji Adapt repomd sync to Leap 16.0 repomod layout changes (single arch, no update repo)
      • add-emoji Make repomd sync idempotent
    • add-emoji Introduce database search
    • add-emoji Setup foreman to run rails s and rake jobs:workoff
    • Adapt UI
      • add-emoji Build Category Browsing
      • add-emoji Build Admin Distribution CRUD interface


    Create a page with all devel:languages:perl packages and their versions by tinita

    Description

    Perl projects now live in git: https://src.opensuse.org/perl

    It would be useful to have an easy way to check which version of which perl module is in devel:languages:perl. Also we have meta overrides and patches for various modules, and it would be good to have them at a central place, so it is easier to lookup, and we can share with other vendors.

    I did some initial data dump here a while ago: https://github.com/perlpunk/cpan-meta

    But I never had the time to automate this.

    I can also use the data to check if there are necessary updates (currently it uses data from download.opensuse.org, so there is some delay and it depends on building).

    Goals

    • Have a script that updates a central repository (e.g. https://src.opensuse.org/perl/_metadata) with metadata by looking at https://src.opensuse.org/perl/_ObsPrj (check if there are any changes from the last run)
    • Create a HTML page with the list of packages (use Javascript and some table library to make it easily searchable)

    Resources

    Results

    Day 1

    Day 2

    • HTML Page has now links to src.opensuse.org and the date of the last update, plus a short info at the top
    • Code is now 100% covered by tests: https://app.codecov.io/gh/perlpunk/opensuse-perl-meta
    • I used the modern perl class feature, which makes perl classes even nicer and shorter. See example
    • Tests
      • I tried out the mocking feature of the modern Test2::V0 library which provides call tracking. See example
      • I tried out comparing data structures with the new Test2::V0 library. It let's you compare parts of the structure with the like function, which only compares the date that is mentioned in the expected data. example

    Day 3

    • Added various things to the table
      • Dependencies column
      • Show popup with info for cpanspec, patches and dependencies
      • Added last date / commit to the data export.

    Plan: With the added date / commit we can now daily check _ObsPrj for changes and only fetch the data for changed packages.

    Day 4


    MCP Perl SDK by kraih

    Description

    We've been using the MCP Perl SDK to connect openQA with AI. And while the basics are working pretty well, the SDK is not fully spec compliant yet. So let's change that!

    Goals

    • Support for Resources
    • All response types (Audio, Resource Links, Embedded Resources...)
    • Tool/Prompt/Resource update notifications
    • Dynamic Tool/Prompt/Resource lists
    • New authentication mechanisms

    Resources


    The Agentic Rancher Experiment: Do Androids Dream of Electric Cattle? by moio

    Rancher is a beast of a codebase. Let's investigate if the new 2025 generation of GitHub Autonomous Coding Agents and Copilot Workspaces can actually tame it. A GitHub robot mascot trying to lasso a blue bull with a Kubernetes logo tatooed on it


    The Plan

    Create a sandbox GitHub Organization, clone in key Rancher repositories, and let the AI loose to see if it can handle real-world enterprise OSS maintenance - or if it just hallucinates new breeds of Kubernetes resources!

    Specifically, throw "Agentic Coders" some typical tasks in a complex, long-lived open-source project, such as:


    The Grunt Work: generate missing GoDocs, unit tests, and refactorings. Rebase PRs.

    The Complex Stuff: fix actual (historical) bugs and feature requests to see if they can traverse the complexity without (too much) human hand-holding.

    Hunting Down Gaps: find areas lacking in docs, areas of improvement in code, dependency bumps, and so on.


    If time allows, also experiment with Model Context Protocol (MCP) to give agents context on our specific build pipelines and CI/CD logs.

    Why?

    We know AI can write "Hello World." and also moderately complex programs from a green field. But can it rebase a 3-month-old PR with conflicts in rancher/rancher? I want to find the breaking point of current AI agents to determine if and how they can help us to reduce our technical debt, work faster and better. At the same time, find out about pitfalls and shortcomings.

    The Outputs

    ❥ A "State of the Agentic Union" for SUSE engineers, detailing what works, what explodes, and how much coffee we can drink while the robots do the rebasing.

    ❥ Honest, Daily Updates With All the Gory Details


    issuefs: FUSE filesystem representing issues (e.g. JIRA) for the use with AI agents code-assistants by llansky3

    Description

    Creating a FUSE filesystem (issuefs) that mounts issues from various ticketing systems (Github, Jira, Bugzilla, Redmine) as files to your local file system.

    And why this is good idea?

    • User can use favorite command line tools to view and search the tickets from various sources
    • User can use AI agents capabilities from your favorite IDE or cli to ask question about the issues, project or functionality while providing relevant tickets as context without extra work.
    • User can use it during development of the new features when you let the AI agent to jump start the solution. The issuefs will give the AI agent the context (AI agents just read few more files) about the bug or requested features. No need for copying and pasting issues to user prompt or by using extra MCP tools to access the issues. These you can still do but this approach is on purpose different.

    Goals

    1. Add Github issue support
    2. Proof the concept/approach by apply the approach on itself using Github issues for tracking and development of new features
    3. Add support for Bugzilla and Redmine using this approach in the process of doing it. Record a video of it.
    4. Clean-up and test the implementation and create some documentation
    5. Create a blog post about this approach

    Resources

    There is a prototype implementation here. This currently sort of works with JIRA only.


    Is SUSE Trending? Popularity and Developer Sentiment Insight Using Native AI Capabilities by terezacerna

    Description

    This project aims to explore the popularity and developer sentiment around SUSE and its technologies compared to Red Hat and their technologies. Using publicly available data sources, I will analyze search trends, developer preferences, repository activity, and media presence. The final outcome will be an interactive Power BI dashboard that provides insights into how SUSE is perceived and discussed across the web and among developers.

    Goals

    1. Assess the popularity of SUSE products and brand compared to Red Hat using Google Trends.
    2. Analyze developer satisfaction and usage trends from the Stack Overflow Developer Survey.
    3. Use the GitHub API to compare SUSE and Red Hat repositories in terms of stars, forks, contributors, and issue activity.
    4. Perform sentiment analysis on GitHub issue comments to measure community tone and engagement using built-in Copilot capabilities.
    5. Perform sentiment analysis on Reddit comments related to SUSE technologies using built-in Copilot capabilities.
    6. Use Gnews.io to track and compare the volume of news articles mentioning SUSE and Red Hat technologies.
    7. Test the integration of Copilot (AI) within Power BI for enhanced data analysis and visualization.
    8. Deliver a comprehensive Power BI report summarizing findings and insights.
    9. Test the full potential of Power BI, including its AI features and native language Q&A.

    Resources

    1. Google Trends: Web scraping for search popularity data
    2. Stack Overflow Developer Survey: For technology popularity and satisfaction comparison
    3. GitHub API: For repository data (stars, forks, contributors, issues, comments).
    4. Gnews.io API: For article volume and mentions analysis.
    5. Reddit: SUSE related topics with comments.