This idea was inspired by the recent discussion on the "talk" mailing list about the (in)security of the German ID card. The Chaos Computer Club and other researchers claim that the ID card is insecure. Actual attacks that have been demonstrated are based on keyloggers.

Keyloggers might be the biggest security threat for Linux users at this time. Keyloggers are trivial to write for Linux and readily installable, and a keylogger with normal user rights may read root's password. One might ask "Why are we caring about local root exploits at all as long as users run stuff like sudo in X terminals"? Keyloggers can even read the input from devices like the Yubikey.

Various techniques exist. The simplest way is just to read xinput events. More sophistcated attacks (usually requiring root) would read from /dev/input or ttys.

My idea is to explore possibilities for a "secure" keyboard mode. This is all totally crude, not thought-through brainstorm material. I'm thinking of an ioctl that would put an input device in a special mode in which events would be forwarded only to a single process (the process that made the ioctl). Care would need to be taken that this functionality couldn't be abused for locking the input device completely. The ability to use this ioctl could be bound to capabilities and/or further restricted e.g. by SELinux, so that not even root would be able to spy on keyboard input easily.

This "secure" mode would than be available for critical operations such as reading pass phrases. In a second step, we might consider doing the password hashing in the kernel, so that user space would never need to read the clear text password at all; I'm not sure what problems with keyboard mapping we'd encounter in such a setup though.

I'd like to understand if this is total bogus, and if not, discuss implementation steps and perhaps create a PoC.

Looking for hackers with the skills:

kernel c

This project is part of:

Hack Week 15

Activity

  • almost 9 years ago: slahl liked this project.
  • almost 9 years ago: hennevogel liked this project.
  • almost 9 years ago: mwilck added keyword "kernel" to this project.
  • almost 9 years ago: mwilck added keyword "c" to this project.
  • almost 9 years ago: mwilck liked this project.
  • almost 9 years ago: mwilck originated this project.

  • Comments

    Be the first to comment!

    Similar Projects

    Backporting patches using LLM by jankara

    Description

    Backporting Linux kernel fixes (either for CVE issues or as part of general git-fixes workflow) is boring and mostly mechanical work (dealing with changes in context, renamed variables, new helper functions etc.). The idea of this project is to explore usage of LLM for backporting Linux kernel commits to SUSE kernels using LLM.

    Goals

    • Create safe environment allowing LLM to run and backport patches without exposing the whole filesystem to it (for privacy and security reasons).
    • Write prompt that will guide LLM through the backporting process. Fine tune it based on experimental results.
    • Explore success rate of LLMs when backporting various patches.

    Resources

    • Docker
    • Gemini CLI

    Repository

    Current version of the container with some instructions for use are at: https://gitlab.suse.de/jankara/gemini-cli-backporter


    pudc - A PID 1 process that barks to the internet by mssola

    Description

    As a fun exercise in order to dig deeper into the Linux kernel, its interfaces, the RISC-V architecture, and all the dragons in between; I'm building a blog site cooked like this:

    • The backend is written in a mixture of C and RISC-V assembly.
    • The backend is actually PID1 (for real, not within a container).
    • We poll and parse incoming HTTP requests ourselves.
    • The frontend is a mere HTML page with htmx.

    The project is meant to be Linux-specific, so I'm going to use io_uring, pidfs, namespaces, and Linux-specific features in order to drive all of this.

    I'm open for suggestions and so on, but this is meant to be a solo project, as this is more of a learning exercise for me than anything else.

    Goals

    • Have a better understanding of different Linux features from user space down to the kernel internals.
    • Most importantly: have fun.

    Resources


    Improve UML page fault handler by ptesarik

    Description

    Improve UML handling of segmentation faults in kernel mode. Although such page faults are generally caused by a kernel bug, it is annoying if they cause an infinite loop, or panic the kernel. More importantly, a robust implementation allows to write KUnit tests for various guard pages, preventing potential kernel self-protection regressions.

    Goals

    Convert the UML page fault handler to use oops_* helpers, go through a few review rounds and finally get my patch series merged in 6.14.

    Resources

    Wrong initial attempt: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231215121431.680-1-petrtesarik@huaweicloud.com/T/


    early stage kdump support by mbrugger

    Project Description

    When we experience a early boot crash, we are not able to analyze the kernel dump, as user-space wasn't able to load the crash system. The idea is to make the crash system compiled into the host kernel (think of initramfs) so that we can create a kernel dump really early in the boot process.

    Goal for the Hackweeks

    1. Investigate if this is possible and the implications it would have (done in HW21)
    2. Hack up a PoC (done in HW22 and HW23)
    3. Prepare RFC series (giving it's only one week, we are entering wishful thinking territory here).

    update HW23

    • I was able to include the crash kernel into the kernel Image.
    • I'll need to find a way to load that from init/main.c:start_kernel() probably after kcsan_init()
    • I workaround for a smoke test was to hack kexec_file_load() systemcall which has two problems:
      1. My initramfs in the porduction kernel does not have a new enough kexec version, that's not a blocker but where the week ended
      2. As the crash kernel is part of init.data it will be already stale once I can call kexec_file_load() from user-space.

    The solution is probably to rewrite the POC so that the invocation can be done from init.text (that's my theory) but I'm not sure if I can reuse the kexec infrastructure in the kernel from there, which I rely on heavily.

    update HW24

    • Day1
      • rebased on v6.12 with no problems others then me breaking the config
      • setting up a new compilation and qemu/virtme env
      • getting desperate as nothing works that used to work
    • Day 2
      • getting to call the invocation of loading the early kernel from __init after kcsan_init()
    • Day 3

      • fix problem of memdup not being able to alloc so much memory... use 64K page sizes for now
      • code refactoring
      • I'm now able to load the crash kernel
      • When using virtme I can boot into the crash kernel, also it doesn't boot completely (major milestone!), crash in elfcorehdr_read_notes()
    • Day 4

      • crash systems crashes (no pun intended) in copy_old_mempage() link; will need to understand elfcorehdr...
      • call path vmcore_init() -> parse_crash_elf_headers() -> elfcorehdr_read() -> read_from_oldmem() -> copy_oldmem_page() -> copy_to_iter()
    • Day 5

      • hacking arch/arm64/kernel/crash_dump.c:copy_old_mempage() to see if crash system really starts. It does.
      • fun fact: retested with more reserved memory and with UEFI FW, host kernel crashes in init but directly starts the crash kernel, so it works (somehow) \o/

    update HW25

    • Day 1
      • rebased crash-kernel on v6.12.59 (for now), still crashing


    dynticks-testing: analyse perf / trace-cmd output and aggregate data by m.crivellari

    Description

    dynticks-testing is a project started years ago by Frederic Weisbecker. One of the feature is to check the actual configuration (isolcpus, irqaffinity etc etc) and give feedback on it.

    An important goal of this tool is to parse the output of trace-cmd / perf and provide more readable data, showing the duration of every events grouped by PID (showing also the CPU number, if the tasks has been migrated etc).

    An example of data captured on my laptop (incomplete!!):

              -0     [005] dN.2. 20310.270699: sched_wakeup:         WaylandProxy:46380 [120] CPU:005
              -0     [005] d..2. 20310.270702: sched_switch:         swapper/5:0 [120] R ==> WaylandProxy:46380 [120]
    ...
        WaylandProxy-46380 [004] d..2. 20310.295397: sched_switch:         WaylandProxy:46380 [120] S ==> swapper/4:0 [120]
              -0     [006] d..2. 20310.295397: sched_switch:         swapper/6:0 [120] R ==> firefox:46373 [120]
             firefox-46373 [006] d..2. 20310.295408: sched_switch:         firefox:46373 [120] S ==> swapper/6:0 [120]
              -0     [004] dN.2. 20310.295466: sched_wakeup:         WaylandProxy:46380 [120] CPU:004
    

    Output of noise_parse.py:

    Task: WaylandProxy Pid: 46380 cpus: {4, 5} (Migrated!!!)
            Wakeup Latency                                Nr:        24     Duration:          89
            Sched switch: kworker/12:2                    Nr:         1     Duration:           6
    

    My first contribution is around Nov. 2024!

    Goals

    • add more features (eg cpuset)
    • test / bugfix

    Resources

    Progresses

    isolcpus and cpusets implemented and merged in master: dynticks-testing.git commit


    Add a machine-readable output to dmidecode by jdelvare

    Description

    There have been repeated requests for a machine-friendly dmidecode output over the last decade. During Hack Week 19, 5 years ago, I prepared the code to support alternative output formats, but didn't have the time to go further. Last year, Jiri Hnidek from Red Hat Linux posted a proof-of-concept implementation to add JSON output support. This is a fairly large pull request which needs to be carefully reviewed and tested.

    Goals

    Review Jiri's work and provide constructive feedback. Merge the code if acceptable. Evaluate the costs and benefits of using a library such as json-c.


    pudc - A PID 1 process that barks to the internet by mssola

    Description

    As a fun exercise in order to dig deeper into the Linux kernel, its interfaces, the RISC-V architecture, and all the dragons in between; I'm building a blog site cooked like this:

    • The backend is written in a mixture of C and RISC-V assembly.
    • The backend is actually PID1 (for real, not within a container).
    • We poll and parse incoming HTTP requests ourselves.
    • The frontend is a mere HTML page with htmx.

    The project is meant to be Linux-specific, so I'm going to use io_uring, pidfs, namespaces, and Linux-specific features in order to drive all of this.

    I'm open for suggestions and so on, but this is meant to be a solo project, as this is more of a learning exercise for me than anything else.

    Goals

    • Have a better understanding of different Linux features from user space down to the kernel internals.
    • Most importantly: have fun.

    Resources


    x64id: An x86/x64 instruction disassembler by m.crivellari

    Description

    This is an old side project. An x86/x64 machine code decoder. It is useful to get instructions' length and identify each of its fields.

    Example:

    C7 85 68 FF FF FF 00 00 00 00

    This is the instruction:

    MOV DWORD PTR SS:[LOCAL.38],0

    What follows are some of the information collected by the disassembler, based on the specific instruction:

    RAW bytes (hex): C7 85 68 FF FF FF 00 00 00 00
    Instr. length: 10
    Print instruction fields:
            Located Prefixes 0:
    
            OP: 0xC7
            mod_reg_rm: 0x85
            disp (4): 0xFFFFFF68
            Iimm: 0x0
    

    Lacks the mnemonic representation: from the previous machine code is not able to produce the "MOV..." instruction, for example.

    Goals

    The goal is almost easy: partially implement the mnemonic representation. I have already started during the weekend, likely tomorrow I will push the branch!

    Resources

    Progress

    Let's consider this example:

    [...other bytes...] 43 89 44 B5 00 01 00 [...other bytes...]
    


    Port OTPClient to GTK >= 4.18 by pstivanin

    Project Description

    OTPClient is currently using GTK3 and cannot easily be ported to GTK4. Since GTK4 came out, there have been quite some big changes. Also, there are now some new deprecation that will take effect with GTK5 (and are active starting from 4.10 as warnings), so I need to think ahead and port OTPClient without using any of those deprecated features.

    Goal for this Hackweek

    • fix the last 3 opened issues (https://github.com/paolostivanin/OTPClient/issues/402, https://github.com/paolostivanin/OTPClient/issues/404, https://github.com/paolostivanin/OTPClient/issues/406) and release a new version
    • continue the rewrite from where we left last year
    • if possible, finally close this 6 years old issue: https://github.com/paolostivanin/OTPClient/issues/123


    Improve the picotm Transaction Manager by tdz

    Picotm is a system-level transaction manager. It provides transactional semantics to low-level C operations, such as

    • memory access,
    • modifying data structures,
    • (some) file I/O, and
    • common interfaces from the C Standard Library and POSIX.

    Picotm also handles error detection and recovery for all it's functionality. It's fully modular, so new functionality can be added.

    For the Hackweek, I want to dedicate some time to picotm. I want to finish some of the refactoring work that I have been working on. If there's time left, I'd like to investigate two-phase commits and how to support them in picotm.

    Picotm is available at http://picotm.org/.