I once had a bad dream.
I started good, a sunny day. I had just fixed an issue and push it to my fork, in order to create a Pull Request. I was happy. It felt awesome to have found a fix so elegant. Two lines of code.
But then, something happened. A cloud appear in the sky and partially hide the sun. github triggered the end to end test suite. You could see the waiting icon, you could almost hear the engines starting, ... a lightning and a thunder appeared in the sky, the sky turned dark and the e2e test started in our private jenkins server.
1 hour passed by... 2 hours .... the e2e tests still running ... 4 hours, not even 50%. Finally, I had to go, get some dinner, get some rest, so I decided to look at it the next day.
Sleep was not good. Dreaming the tests would fail and the deadline be missed .... I couldn't sleep no more so I wake up early in the morning, before sunrise. The computer still opened was lightning up the room. Out, the storm turned out to be a heavy rain. And the tests did not passed! 4 hours and half after starting them, so half an hour after leaving for dinner, and there was a fail test.
Finding out what went wrong took 2 hours...it was not even related to the code, but an infrastructure issue. A timeout when connecting to a mirror which was being restarted when the tests run. Apparently we hit a maintenance window.
Damn! So let's just "restart" the tests. This time, I decided to put an alarm 4 hours after and switch to another task, just to avoid the anxiety of the previous evening looking at the results. 4 hours passed by, and the tests are good. It is not raining anymore, a git of sun is filtering throw the window, hope is in the air. 4 more hours, and the tests still have not failed. Going to dinner and bed again and putting the alarm early in the morning. First thing in the morning I looked at the tests ... running again, feels good. All tests have passed and there is only one final "cleanup" state. Shower, breakfeast, sun is shining again!
Finally, all is green, so let's go and push the merge button ... oh oh ... clouds hide the sun again ... where is the merge button?? no way, there is a conflict with the code in master and I can't merge!!! I can't merge!!! shocked, I looked into the history ... John merged a PR overnight that was touching the same file ... hopeless I start crying on my desk...
Scared?
This is not so different on what could happen if we were running the whole e2e test suite in the SUSE Manager (uyuni) Pull Requests. However, not running any e2e tests has also a bad consequence. We find the issues after code has been merged in master, and then we spend days looking at what could have caused this, reverting commits, and starting again.
However, if we could run a subset of the e2e tests, we could shorten the time it takes and so run them at the PR level, so no broken code could get merged.
The thing is , how do we select which tests to run?
This project is about using Machine Learning to do predictive test selection, thus selecting which tests to run based on the history of previous test runs.
Inspired by: https://engineering.fb.com/2018/11/21/developer-tools/predictive-test-selection/
No Hackers yet
This project is part of:
Hack Week 20
Activity
Comments
-
over 4 years ago by llansky3 | Reply
This could have some wider potential - clever picking of tests to shorten the time yet maximize the findings (and learning that in time based on test execution history to predict). I can see how that saves tons of money in cases where test on a real industrial machines need to be executed (e.g. cost of running engine on a test bed is 5-10k$ per day so there is huge difference if you need to run for 1 or 3 days)
Similar Projects
Flaky Tests AI Finder for Uyuni and MLM Test Suites by oscar-barrios
Description
Our current Grafana dashboards provide a great overview of test suite health, including a panel for "Top failed tests." However, identifying which of these failures are due to legitimate bugs versus intermittent "flaky tests" is a manual, time-consuming process. These flaky tests erode trust in our test suites and slow down development.
This project aims to build a simple but powerful Python script that automates flaky test detection. The script will directly query our Prometheus instance for the historical data of each failed test, using the jenkins_build_test_case_failure_age metric. It will then format this data and send it to the Gemini API with a carefully crafted prompt, asking it to identify which tests show a flaky pattern.
The final output will be a clean JSON list of the most probable flaky tests, which can then be used to populate a new "Top Flaky Tests" panel in our existing Grafana test suite dashboard.
Goals
By the end of Hack Week, we aim to have a single, working Python script that:
- Connects to Prometheus and executes a query to fetch detailed test failure history.
- Processes the raw data into a format suitable for the Gemini API.
- Successfully calls the Gemini API with the data and a clear prompt.
- Parses the AI's response to extract a simple list of flaky tests.
- Saves the list to a JSON file that can be displayed in Grafana.
- New panel in our Dashboard listing the Flaky tests
Resources
- Jenkins Prometheus Exporter: https://github.com/uyuni-project/jenkins-exporter/
- Data Source: Our internal Prometheus server.
- Key Metric:
jenkins_build_test_case_failure_age{jobname, buildid, suite, case, status, failedsince}. - Existing Query for Reference:
count by (suite) (max_over_time(jenkins_build_test_case_failure_age{status=~"FAILED|REGRESSION", jobname="$jobname"}[$__range])). - AI Model: The Google Gemini API.
- Example about how to interact with Gemini API: https://github.com/srbarrios/FailTale/
- Visualization: Our internal Grafana Dashboard.
- Internal IaC: https://gitlab.suse.de/galaxy/infrastructure/-/tree/master/srv/salt/monitoring
SUSE Observability MCP server by drutigliano
Description
The idea is to implement the SUSE Observability Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server as a specialized, middle-tier API designed to translate the complex, high-cardinality observability data from StackState (topology, metrics, and events) into highly structured, contextually rich, and LLM-ready snippets.
This MCP Server abstract the StackState APIs. Its primary function is to serve as a Tool/Function Calling target for AI agents. When an AI receives an alert or a user query (e.g., "What caused the outage?"), the AI calls an MCP Server endpoint. The server then fetches the relevant operational facts, summarizes them, normalizes technical identifiers (like URNs and raw metric names) into natural language concepts, and returns a concise JSON or YAML payload. This payload is then injected directly into the LLM's prompt, ensuring the final diagnosis or action is grounded in real-time, accurate SUSE Observability data, effectively minimizing hallucinations.
Goals
- Grounding AI Responses: Ensure that all AI diagnoses, root cause analyses, and action recommendations are strictly based on verifiable, real-time data retrieved from the SUSE Observability StackState platform.
- Simplifying Data Access: Abstract the complexity of StackState's native APIs (e.g., Time Travel, 4T Data Model) into simple, semantic functions that can be easily invoked by LLM tool-calling mechanisms.
- Data Normalization: Convert complex, technical identifiers (like component URNs, raw metric names, and proprietary health states) into standardized, natural language terms that an LLM can easily reason over.
- Enabling Automated Remediation: Define clear, action-oriented MCP endpoints (e.g., execute_runbook) that allow the AI agent to initiate automated operational workflows (e.g., restarts, scaling) after a diagnosis, closing the loop on observability.
Resources
- https://www.honeycomb.io/blog/its-the-end-of-observability-as-we-know-it-and-i-feel-fine
- https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/datadog-remote-mcp-server
- https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-06-18/index
Basic implementation
- https://github.com/drutigliano19/suse-observability-mcp-server