I once had a bad dream.
I started good, a sunny day. I had just fixed an issue and push it to my fork, in order to create a Pull Request. I was happy. It felt awesome to have found a fix so elegant. Two lines of code.
But then, something happened. A cloud appear in the sky and partially hide the sun. github triggered the end to end test suite. You could see the waiting icon, you could almost hear the engines starting, ... a lightning and a thunder appeared in the sky, the sky turned dark and the e2e test started in our private jenkins server.
1 hour passed by... 2 hours .... the e2e tests still running ... 4 hours, not even 50%. Finally, I had to go, get some dinner, get some rest, so I decided to look at it the next day.
Sleep was not good. Dreaming the tests would fail and the deadline be missed .... I couldn't sleep no more so I wake up early in the morning, before sunrise. The computer still opened was lightning up the room. Out, the storm turned out to be a heavy rain. And the tests did not passed! 4 hours and half after starting them, so half an hour after leaving for dinner, and there was a fail test.
Finding out what went wrong took 2 hours...it was not even related to the code, but an infrastructure issue. A timeout when connecting to a mirror which was being restarted when the tests run. Apparently we hit a maintenance window.
Damn! So let's just "restart" the tests. This time, I decided to put an alarm 4 hours after and switch to another task, just to avoid the anxiety of the previous evening looking at the results. 4 hours passed by, and the tests are good. It is not raining anymore, a git of sun is filtering throw the window, hope is in the air. 4 more hours, and the tests still have not failed. Going to dinner and bed again and putting the alarm early in the morning. First thing in the morning I looked at the tests ... running again, feels good. All tests have passed and there is only one final "cleanup" state. Shower, breakfeast, sun is shining again!
Finally, all is green, so let's go and push the merge button ... oh oh ... clouds hide the sun again ... where is the merge button?? no way, there is a conflict with the code in master and I can't merge!!! I can't merge!!! shocked, I looked into the history ... John merged a PR overnight that was touching the same file ... hopeless I start crying on my desk...
Scared?
This is not so different on what could happen if we were running the whole e2e test suite in the SUSE Manager (uyuni) Pull Requests. However, not running any e2e tests has also a bad consequence. We find the issues after code has been merged in master, and then we spend days looking at what could have caused this, reverting commits, and starting again.
However, if we could run a subset of the e2e tests, we could shorten the time it takes and so run them at the PR level, so no broken code could get merged.
The thing is , how do we select which tests to run?
This project is about using Machine Learning to do predictive test selection, thus selecting which tests to run based on the history of previous test runs.
Inspired by: https://engineering.fb.com/2018/11/21/developer-tools/predictive-test-selection/
No Hackers yet
This project is part of:
Hack Week 20
Activity
Comments
-
over 4 years ago by llansky3 | Reply
This could have some wider potential - clever picking of tests to shorten the time yet maximize the findings (and learning that in time based on test execution history to predict). I can see how that saves tons of money in cases where test on a real industrial machines need to be executed (e.g. cost of running engine on a test bed is 5-10k$ per day so there is huge difference if you need to run for 1 or 3 days)
Similar Projects
Kubernetes-Based ML Lifecycle Automation by lmiranda
Description
This project aims to build a complete end-to-end Machine Learning pipeline running entirely on Kubernetes, using Go, and containerized ML components.
The pipeline will automate the lifecycle of a machine learning model, including:
- Data ingestion/collection
- Model training as a Kubernetes Job
- Model artifact storage in an S3-compatible registry (e.g. Minio)
- A Go-based deployment controller that automatically deploys new model versions to Kubernetes using Rancher
- A lightweight inference service that loads and serves the latest model
- Monitoring of model performance and service health through Prometheus/Grafana
The outcome is a working prototype of an MLOps workflow that demonstrates how AI workloads can be trained, versioned, deployed, and monitored using the Kubernetes ecosystem.
Goals
By the end of Hack Week, the project should:
Produce a fully functional ML pipeline running on Kubernetes with:
- Data collection job
- Training job container
- Storage and versioning of trained models
- Automated deployment of new model versions
- Model inference API service
- Basic monitoring dashboards
Showcase a Go-based deployment automation component, which scans the model registry and automatically generates & applies Kubernetes manifests for new model versions.
Enable continuous improvement by making the system modular and extensible (e.g., additional models, metrics, autoscaling, or drift detection can be added later).
Prepare a short demo explaining the end-to-end process and how new models flow through the system.
Resources
Self-Scaling LLM Infrastructure Powered by Rancher by ademicev0
Self-Scaling LLM Infrastructure Powered by Rancher
Description
The Problem
Running LLMs can get expensive and complex pretty quickly.
Today there are typically two choices:
- Use cloud APIs like OpenAI or Anthropic. Easy to start with, but costs add up at scale.
- Self-host everything - set up Kubernetes, figure out GPU scheduling, handle scaling, manage model serving... it's a lot of work.
What if there was a middle ground?
What if infrastructure scaled itself instead of making you scale it?
Can we use existing Rancher capabilities like CAPI, autoscaling, and GitOps to make this simpler instead of building everything from scratch?
Project Repository: github.com/alexander-demicev/llmserverless
What This Project Does
A key feature is hybrid deployment: requests can be routed based on complexity or privacy needs. Simple or low-sensitivity queries can use public APIs (like OpenAI), while complex or private requests are handled in-house on local infrastructure. This flexibility allows balancing cost, privacy, and performance - using cloud for routine tasks and on-premises resources for sensitive or demanding workloads.
A complete, self-scaling LLM infrastructure that:
- Scales to zero when idle (no idle costs)
- Scales up automatically when requests come in
- Adds more nodes when needed, removes them when demand drops
- Runs on any infrastructure - laptop, bare metal, or cloud
Think of it as "serverless for LLMs" - focus on building, the infrastructure handles itself.
How It Works
A combination of open source tools working together:
Flow:
- Users interact with OpenWebUI (chat interface)
- Requests go to LiteLLM Gateway
- LiteLLM routes requests to:
- Ollama (Knative) for local model inference (auto-scales pods)
- Or cloud APIs for fallback
Try AI training with ROCm and LoRA by bmwiedemann
Description
I want to setup a Radeon RX 9600 XT 16 GB at home with ROCm on Slowroll.
Goals
I want to test how fast AI inference can get with the GPU and if I can use LoRA to re-train an existing free model for some task.
Resources
- https://rocm.docs.amd.com/en/latest/compatibility/compatibility-matrix.html
- https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/science:GPU:ROCm
- https://src.opensuse.org/ROCm/
- https://www.suse.com/c/lora-fine-tuning-llms-for-text-classification/
Results
got inference working with llama.cpp:
export LLAMACPP_ROCM_ARCH=gfx1200
HIPCXX="$(hipconfig -l)/clang" HIP_PATH="$(hipconfig -R)" \
cmake -S . -B build -DGGML_HIP=ON -DAMDGPU_TARGETS=$LLAMACPP_ROCM_ARCH \
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLAMA_CURL=ON \
-Dhipblas_DIR=/usr/lib64/cmake/hipblaslt/ \
&& cmake --build build --config Release -j8
m=models/gpt-oss-20b-mxfp4.gguf
cd $P/llama.cpp && build/bin/llama-server --model $m --threads 8 --port 8005 --host 0.0.0.0 --device ROCm0 --n-gpu-layers 999
Without the --device option it faulted. Maybe because my APU also appears there?
I updated/fixed various related packages: https://src.opensuse.org/ROCm/rocm-examples/pulls/1 https://src.opensuse.org/ROCm/hipblaslt/pulls/1 SR 1320959
benchmark
I benchmarked inference with llama.cpp + gpt-oss-20b-mxfp4.gguf and ROCm offloading to a Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB. I varied the number of layers that went to the GPU:
- 0 layers 14.49 tokens/s (8 CPU cores)
- 9 layers 17.79 tokens/s 34% VRAM
- 15 layers 22.39 tokens/s 51% VRAM
- 20 layers 27.49 tokens/s 64% VRAM
- 24 layers 41.18 tokens/s 74% VRAM
- 25+ layers 86.63 tokens/s 75% VRAM (only 200% CPU load)
So there is a significant performance-boost if the whole model fits into the GPU's VRAM.
SUSE Edge Image Builder MCP by eminguez
Description
Based on my other hackweek project, SUSE Edge Image Builder's Json Schema I would like to build also a MCP to be able to generate EIB config files the AI way.
Realistically I don't think I'll be able to have something consumable at the end of this hackweek but at least I would like to start exploring MCPs, the difference between an API and MCP, etc.
Goals
- Familiarize myself with MCPs
- Unrealistic: Have an MCP that can generate an EIB config file
Resources
Result
https://github.com/e-minguez/eib-mcp
I've extensively used antigravity and its agent mode to code this. This heavily uses https://hackweek.opensuse.org/25/projects/suse-edge-image-builder-json-schema for the MCP to be built.
I've ended up learning a lot of things about "prompting", json schemas in general, some golang, MCPs and AI in general :)
Example:
Generate an Edge Image Builder configuration for an ISO image based on slmicro-6.2.iso, targeting x86_64 architecture. The output name should be 'my-edge-image' and it should install to /dev/sda. It should deploy
a 3 nodes kubernetes cluster with nodes names "node1", "node2" and "node3" as:
* hostname: node1, IP: 1.1.1.1, role: initializer
* hostname: node2, IP: 1.1.1.2, role: agent
* hostname: node3, IP: 1.1.1.3, role: agent
The kubernetes version should be k3s 1.33.4-k3s1 and it should deploy a cert-manager helm chart (the latest one available according to https://cert-manager.io/docs/installation/helm/). It should create a user
called "suse" with password "suse" and set ntp to "foo.ntp.org". The VIP address for the API should be 1.2.3.4
Generates:
``` apiVersion: "1.0" image: arch: x86_64 baseImage: slmicro-6.2.iso imageType: iso outputImageName: my-edge-image kubernetes: helm: charts: - name: cert-manager repositoryName: jetstack
MCP Server for SCC by digitaltomm
Description
Provide an MCP Server implementation for customers to access data on scc.suse.com via MCP protocol. The core benefit of this MCP interface is that it has direct (read) access to customer data in SCC, so the AI agent gets enhanced knowledge about individual customer data, like subscriptions, orders and registered systems.
Architecture
Goals
We want to demonstrate a proof of concept to connect to the SCC MCP server with any AI agent, for example gemini-cli or codex. Enabling the user to ask questions regarding their SCC inventory.
For this Hackweek, we target that users get proper responses to these example questions:
- Which of my currently active systems are running products that are out of support?
- Do I have ready to use registration codes for SLES?
- What are the latest 5 released patches for SLES 15 SP6? Output as a list with release date, patch name, affected package names and fixed CVEs.
- Which versions of kernel-default are available on SLES 15 SP6?
Technical Notes
Similar to the organization APIs, this can expose to customers data about their subscriptions, orders, systems and products. Authentication should be done by organization credentials, similar to what needs to be provided to RMT/MLM. Customers can connect to the SCC MCP server from their own MCP-compatible client and Large Language Model (LLM), so no third party is involved.
Milestones
[x] Basic MCP API setup MCP endpoints [x] Products / Repositories [x] Subscriptions / Orders [x] Systems [x] Packages [x] Document usage with Gemini CLI, Codex
Resources
Gemini CLI setup:
~/.gemini/settings.json:
The Agentic Rancher Experiment: Do Androids Dream of Electric Cattle? by moio
Rancher is a beast of a codebase. Let's investigate if the new 2025 generation of GitHub Autonomous Coding Agents and Copilot Workspaces can actually tame it. 
The Plan
Create a sandbox GitHub Organization, clone in key Rancher repositories, and let the AI loose to see if it can handle real-world enterprise OSS maintenance - or if it just hallucinates new breeds of Kubernetes resources!
Specifically, throw "Agentic Coders" some typical tasks in a complex, long-lived open-source project, such as:
❥ The Grunt Work: generate missing GoDocs, unit tests, and refactorings. Rebase PRs.
❥ The Complex Stuff: fix actual (historical) bugs and feature requests to see if they can traverse the complexity without (too much) human hand-holding.
❥ Hunting Down Gaps: find areas lacking in docs, areas of improvement in code, dependency bumps, and so on.
If time allows, also experiment with Model Context Protocol (MCP) to give agents context on our specific build pipelines and CI/CD logs.
Why?
We know AI can write "Hello World." and also moderately complex programs from a green field. But can it rebase a 3-month-old PR with conflicts in rancher/rancher? I want to find the breaking point of current AI agents to determine if and how they can help us to reduce our technical debt, work faster and better. At the same time, find out about pitfalls and shortcomings.
The Outputs
❥ A "State of the Agentic Union" for SUSE engineers, detailing what works, what explodes, and how much coffee we can drink while the robots do the rebasing.
❥ Honest, Daily Updates With All the Gory Details