Who of you remembers this awesome game? One of my favorites when I was a child (oh yes!).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SkyRoads(videogame)
Why not program something similar and reinvent the wheel?! Yes there are many clones out there but Hackweek should be about having fun, right?
I would love to write the clone in Haskell using a functional reactive programming library (e.g. Yampa or Netwire).
My goal is to learn more about OpenGL, GLSL and Haskell.
If you're interested don't hesitate to join and have fun together!
No Hackers yet
This project is part of:
Hack Week 17
Activity
Comments
Be the first to comment!
Similar Projects
GHC-9.14 and split Hadrian from GHC build by osukup
Description
Prepare openSUSE Tumbleweed project for new GHC Haskell compiler and separate builder (Hadrian) from GHC build
Goals
- have GHC-9.14 project with working compiler and if possible filled with packageset
- have Hadrian in own package built with bootstrap compiler to separate Hadrian bootstrap from ghc bootstrap
Resources
opensuse haskell package gen project
eBPF bytecode emitter in Haskell by kalfalakh
Description
Newbie level knowledge of eBPF and some knowledge of Haskell. The goal for this hackweek is to catch two birds with one stone; get familiar with eBPF and learn more about Haskell, hence implement something related to eBPF in Haskell. Given an input, which is a program, represented as eBPF instructions, prepare a fully built eBPF bytecode ready to be loaded into the Kernel.
Goals
- Recap on ADTs in Haskell, type classes and their instances / deriving, on pattern matching and higher order functions
- Read and understand RFC 9669
- Implement the entire pipeline; parsing the input, verifying the input, building instructions, encoding them and concatenating them
- Deal with all the learning, bugs and difficulties encountered on the way
Progress
Last day of hackweek and this is what I have so far.
- ADTs implemented to correctly type all operations, classes, opcodes, instructions and other instruction specific types
- opcodes and opcode builders based on specification are implemented.
- Encoder is ready for 64-bit instruction format. Extended 128-bit instruction format is not yet supported
- Only ALU and ALU64 instructions API is provided. JMP, LD, ST for base32 and base64 are missing. swap and atomic are missing
- All ALU and ALU64 instructions (except MOV and MOVSX) are tested manually and are correctly encoded
Whats next?
There is still a lot left to do:
- Input parser and formatter + some kind of basic verifier
- API for remaining instruction classes
- Proper testing mechanism
- swap and atomic instructions
- Loader
Resources
- RFC 9669
- https://ebpf.io/
- https://www.haskell.org/documentation/