I once had a bad dream.
I started good, a sunny day. I had just fixed an issue and push it to my fork, in order to create a Pull Request. I was happy. It felt awesome to have found a fix so elegant. Two lines of code.
But then, something happened. A cloud appear in the sky and partially hide the sun. github triggered the end to end test suite. You could see the waiting icon, you could almost hear the engines starting, ... a lightning and a thunder appeared in the sky, the sky turned dark and the e2e test started in our private jenkins server.
1 hour passed by... 2 hours .... the e2e tests still running ... 4 hours, not even 50%. Finally, I had to go, get some dinner, get some rest, so I decided to look at it the next day.
Sleep was not good. Dreaming the tests would fail and the deadline be missed .... I couldn't sleep no more so I wake up early in the morning, before sunrise. The computer still opened was lightning up the room. Out, the storm turned out to be a heavy rain. And the tests did not passed! 4 hours and half after starting them, so half an hour after leaving for dinner, and there was a fail test.
Finding out what went wrong took 2 hours...it was not even related to the code, but an infrastructure issue. A timeout when connecting to a mirror which was being restarted when the tests run. Apparently we hit a maintenance window.
Damn! So let's just "restart" the tests. This time, I decided to put an alarm 4 hours after and switch to another task, just to avoid the anxiety of the previous evening looking at the results. 4 hours passed by, and the tests are good. It is not raining anymore, a git of sun is filtering throw the window, hope is in the air. 4 more hours, and the tests still have not failed. Going to dinner and bed again and putting the alarm early in the morning. First thing in the morning I looked at the tests ... running again, feels good. All tests have passed and there is only one final "cleanup" state. Shower, breakfeast, sun is shining again!
Finally, all is green, so let's go and push the merge button ... oh oh ... clouds hide the sun again ... where is the merge button?? no way, there is a conflict with the code in master and I can't merge!!! I can't merge!!! shocked, I looked into the history ... John merged a PR overnight that was touching the same file ... hopeless I start crying on my desk...
Scared?
This is not so different on what could happen if we were running the whole e2e test suite in the SUSE Manager (uyuni) Pull Requests. However, not running any e2e tests has also a bad consequence. We find the issues after code has been merged in master, and then we spend days looking at what could have caused this, reverting commits, and starting again.
However, if we could run a subset of the e2e tests, we could shorten the time it takes and so run them at the PR level, so no broken code could get merged.
The thing is , how do we select which tests to run?
This project is about using Machine Learning to do predictive test selection, thus selecting which tests to run based on the history of previous test runs.
Inspired by: https://engineering.fb.com/2018/11/21/developer-tools/predictive-test-selection/
No Hackers yet
This project is part of:
Hack Week 20
Activity
Comments
-
almost 5 years ago by llansky3 | Reply
This could have some wider potential - clever picking of tests to shorten the time yet maximize the findings (and learning that in time based on test execution history to predict). I can see how that saves tons of money in cases where test on a real industrial machines need to be executed (e.g. cost of running engine on a test bed is 5-10k$ per day so there is huge difference if you need to run for 1 or 3 days)
Similar Projects
Kubernetes-Based ML Lifecycle Automation by lmiranda
Description
This project aims to build a complete end-to-end Machine Learning pipeline running entirely on Kubernetes, using Go, and containerized ML components.
The pipeline will automate the lifecycle of a machine learning model, including:
- Data ingestion/collection
- Model training as a Kubernetes Job
- Model artifact storage in an S3-compatible registry (e.g. Minio)
- A Go-based deployment controller that automatically deploys new model versions to Kubernetes using Rancher
- A lightweight inference service that loads and serves the latest model
- Monitoring of model performance and service health through Prometheus/Grafana
The outcome is a working prototype of an MLOps workflow that demonstrates how AI workloads can be trained, versioned, deployed, and monitored using the Kubernetes ecosystem.
Goals
By the end of Hack Week, the project should:
Produce a fully functional ML pipeline running on Kubernetes with:
- Data collection job
- Training job container
- Storage and versioning of trained models
- Automated deployment of new model versions
- Model inference API service
- Basic monitoring dashboards
Showcase a Go-based deployment automation component, which scans the model registry and automatically generates & applies Kubernetes manifests for new model versions.
Enable continuous improvement by making the system modular and extensible (e.g., additional models, metrics, autoscaling, or drift detection can be added later).
Prepare a short demo explaining the end-to-end process and how new models flow through the system.
Resources
Updates
- Training pipeline and datasets
- Inference Service py
Enable more features in mcp-server-uyuni by j_renner
Description
I would like to contribute to mcp-server-uyuni, the MCP server for Uyuni / Multi-Linux Manager) exposing additional features as tools. There is lots of relevant features to be found throughout the API, for example:
- System operations and infos
- System groups
- Maintenance windows
- Ansible
- Reporting
- ...
At the end of the week I managed to enable basic system group operations:
- List all system groups visible to the user
- Create new system groups
- List systems assigned to a group
- Add and remove systems from groups
Goals
- Set up test environment locally with the MCP server and client + a recent MLM server [DONE]
- Identify features and use cases offering a benefit with limited effort required for enablement [DONE]
- Create a PR to the repo [DONE]
Resources
Self-Scaling LLM Infrastructure Powered by Rancher by ademicev0
Self-Scaling LLM Infrastructure Powered by Rancher
Description
The Problem
Running LLMs can get expensive and complex pretty quickly.
Today there are typically two choices:
- Use cloud APIs like OpenAI or Anthropic. Easy to start with, but costs add up at scale.
- Self-host everything - set up Kubernetes, figure out GPU scheduling, handle scaling, manage model serving... it's a lot of work.
What if there was a middle ground?
What if infrastructure scaled itself instead of making you scale it?
Can we use existing Rancher capabilities like CAPI, autoscaling, and GitOps to make this simpler instead of building everything from scratch?
Project Repository: github.com/alexander-demicev/llmserverless
What This Project Does
A key feature is hybrid deployment: requests can be routed based on complexity or privacy needs. Simple or low-sensitivity queries can use public APIs (like OpenAI), while complex or private requests are handled in-house on local infrastructure. This flexibility allows balancing cost, privacy, and performance - using cloud for routine tasks and on-premises resources for sensitive or demanding workloads.
A complete, self-scaling LLM infrastructure that:
- Scales to zero when idle (no idle costs)
- Scales up automatically when requests come in
- Adds more nodes when needed, removes them when demand drops
- Runs on any infrastructure - laptop, bare metal, or cloud
Think of it as "serverless for LLMs" - focus on building, the infrastructure handles itself.
How It Works
A combination of open source tools working together:
Flow:
- Users interact with OpenWebUI (chat interface)
- Requests go to LiteLLM Gateway
- LiteLLM routes requests to:
- Ollama (Knative) for local model inference (auto-scales pods)
- Or cloud APIs for fallback
MCP Trace Suite by r1chard-lyu
Description
This project plans to create an MCP Trace Suite, a system that consolidates commonly used Linux debugging tools such as bpftrace, perf, and ftrace.
The suite is implemented as an MCP Server. This architecture allows an AI agent to leverage the server to diagnose Linux issues and perform targeted system debugging by remotely executing and retrieving tracing data from these powerful tools.
- Repo: https://github.com/r1chard-lyu/systracesuite
- Demo: Slides
Goals
Build an MCP Server that can integrate various Linux debugging and tracing tools, including bpftrace, perf, ftrace, strace, and others, with support for future expansion of additional tools.
Perform testing by intentionally creating bugs or issues that impact system performance, allowing an AI agent to analyze the root cause and identify the underlying problem.
Resources
- Gemini CLI: https://geminicli.com/
- eBPF: https://ebpf.io/
- bpftrace: https://github.com/bpftrace/bpftrace/
- perf: https://perfwiki.github.io/main/
- ftrace: https://github.com/r1chard-lyu/tracium/
Uyuni Health-check Grafana AI Troubleshooter by ygutierrez
Description
This project explores the feasibility of using the open-source Grafana LLM plugin to enhance the Uyuni Health-check tool with LLM capabilities. The idea is to integrate a chat-based "AI Troubleshooter" directly into existing dashboards, allowing users to ask natural-language questions about errors, anomalies, or performance issues.
Goals
- Investigate if and how the
grafana-llm-appplug-in can be used within the Uyuni Health-check tool. - Investigate if this plug-in can be used to query LLMs for troubleshooting scenarios.
- Evaluate support for local LLMs and external APIs through the plugin.
- Evaluate if and how the Uyuni MCP server could be integrated as another source of information.
Resources
Explore LLM evaluation metrics by thbertoldi
Description
Learn the best practices for evaluating LLM performance with an open-source framework such as DeepEval.
Goals
Curate the knowledge learned during practice and present it to colleagues.
-> Maybe publish a blog post on SUSE's blog?
Resources
https://deepeval.com
https://docs.pactflow.io/docs/bi-directional-contract-testing