Project Description

The keys in db or mok can be used to verify boot loader and kernel binary for booting. But upstream kernel doesn't trust them for enrolling to trusted keyring because they are enrolled outside the boundaries of kernel. Which means that IMA can not use db/mok keys for verification.

Currently if users/partners want to enroll their keys to the kernel trusted keyring, the user key must be signed by kernel's build-in key. But SUSE will not sign any user key. In upstream, there have some known technologies against this situation:

  • CONFIGSYSTEMEXTRA_CERTIFICATE Reserve a space in kernel binary for enrolling user's key.

  • MokListTrustedRT A new MOK variable be introduced. User can use this variable to tell shim and kernel that the keys in MOK can be trusted by kernel. Which means keys will be enrolled to trusted keyring.

Goal for this Hackweek

Find a good way for SLE/openSUSE user for enrolling their key to trust keyring in kernel. IMA should also trust those keys.

Resources

kernel, shim, mokutil

Looking for hackers with the skills:

security shim kernel mok

This project is part of:

Hack Week 21

Activity

  • almost 3 years ago: joeyli started this project.
  • about 3 years ago: jzerebecki liked this project.
  • about 3 years ago: joeyli added keyword "security" to this project.
  • about 3 years ago: joeyli added keyword "shim" to this project.
  • about 3 years ago: joeyli added keyword "kernel" to this project.
  • about 3 years ago: joeyli added keyword "mok" to this project.
  • about 3 years ago: joeyli originated this project.

  • Comments

    • jzerebecki
      about 3 years ago by jzerebecki | Reply

      Thank you, good to know. This would make SecureBoot useful for me. Seems MokListTrustedRT is supported since kernel v5.18-rc1: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/eaa54b1458ca84092e513d554dd6d234245e6bef/security/integrity/platformcerts/machinekeyring.c#L57 And since shim 15.5-rc2: https://github.com/rhboot/shim/commit/4e513405b4f1641710115780d19dcec130c5208f

      • joeyli
        almost 3 years ago by joeyli | Reply

        Thanks for your information! I will try the .machine keyring with IMA/EVM.

    • joeyli
      almost 3 years ago by joeyli | Reply

      My report of hackweek 21 topic in Asia wrap-up meeting: https://mysuse-my.sharepoint.com/:f:/g/personal/jleesusecom/Eh9GI6bsNU5IkhsmgSQR17IBFxGK7eXWhxj1_EvCVo80Pg?e=bc2198

    • joeyli
      almost 3 years ago by joeyli | Reply

      Video record of presentation in Asia wrap-up meeting: https://mysuse-my.sharepoint.com/:v:/g/personal/jleesusecom/EaoOJVtjeORAobvoqg75-D0BBgd9E5xkD6KgDGT226F-Tw?e=ma0tUh

    • joeyli
      almost 3 years ago by joeyli | Reply

      Environment: shim 15.6, Liunx v5.18 Kernel, openSUSE Tumbleweed

    Similar Projects

    early stage kdump support by mbrugger

    Project Description

    When we experience a early boot crash, we are not able to analyze the kernel dump, as user-space wasn't able to load the crash system. The idea is to make the crash system compiled into the host kernel (think of initramfs) so that we can create a kernel dump really early in the boot process.

    Goal for the Hackweeks

    1. Investigate if this is possible and the implications it would have (done in HW21)
    2. Hack up a PoC (done in HW22 and HW23)
    3. Prepare RFC series (giving it's only one week, we are entering wishful thinking territory here).

    update HW23

    • I was able to include the crash kernel into the kernel Image.
    • I'll need to find a way to load that from init/main.c:start_kernel() probably after kcsan_init()
    • I workaround for a smoke test was to hack kexec_file_load() systemcall which has two problems:
      1. My initramfs in the porduction kernel does not have a new enough kexec version, that's not a blocker but where the week ended
      2. As the crash kernel is part of init.data it will be already stale once I can call kexec_file_load() from user-space.

    The solution is probably to rewrite the POC so that the invocation can be done from init.text (that's my theory) but I'm not sure if I can reuse the kexec infrastructure in the kernel from there, which I rely on heavily.

    update HW24

    • Day1
      • rebased on v6.12 with no problems others then me breaking the config
      • setting up a new compilation and qemu/virtme env
      • getting desperate as nothing works that used to work
    • Day 2
      • getting to call the invocation of loading the early kernel from __init after kcsan_init()
    • Day 3

      • fix problem of memdup not being able to alloc so much memory... use 64K page sizes for now
      • code refactoring
      • I'm now able to load the crash kernel
      • When using virtme I can boot into the crash kernel, also it doesn't boot completely (major milestone!), crash in elfcorehdr_read_notes()
    • Day 4

      • crash systems crashes (no pun intended) in copy_old_mempage() link; will need to understand elfcorehdr...
      • call path vmcore_init() -> parse_crash_elf_headers() -> elfcorehdr_read() -> read_from_oldmem() -> copy_oldmem_page() -> copy_to_iter()
    • Day 5

      • hacking arch/arm64/kernel/crash_dump.c:copy_old_mempage() to see if crash system really starts. It does.
      • fun fact: retested with more reserved memory and with UEFI FW, host kernel crashes in init but directly starts the crash kernel, so it works (somehow) \o/
    • TODOs

      • fix elfcorehdr so that we actually can make use of all this...
      • test where in the boot __init() chain we can/should call kexec_early_dump()