Project Description

Although opensuse already supports CM4 and Pi400, there isn't an upstream devicetree for those boards. My plan is to spend the week implementing them. Sadly it's a project where collaboration is hard. But I'll be happy to try.

Goal for this Hackweek

Send a series upstream.

Resources

https://www.raspberrypi.org/documentation/

Looking for hackers with the skills:

arm64 raspberrypi

This project is part of:

Hack Week 20

Activity

  • almost 4 years ago: ph03nix liked this project.
  • almost 4 years ago: iivanov liked this project.
  • almost 4 years ago: mbrugger liked this project.
  • almost 4 years ago: nsaenzjulienne started this project.
  • almost 4 years ago: nsaenzjulienne added keyword "arm64" to this project.
  • almost 4 years ago: nsaenzjulienne added keyword "raspberrypi" to this project.
  • almost 4 years ago: nsaenzjulienne originated this project.

  • Comments

    Be the first to comment!

    Similar Projects

    Create openSUSE images for Arm/RISC-V boards by avicenzi

    Project Description

    Create openSUSE images (or test generic EFI images) for Arm and/or RISC-V boards that are not yet supported.

    Goal for this Hackweek

    Create bootable images of Tumbleweed for SBCs that currently have no images available or are untested.

    Consider generic EFI images where possible, as some boards can hold a bootloader.

    Document in the openSUSE Wiki how to flash and use the image for a given board.

    Boards that I have around and there are no images:

    • Rock 3B
    • Nano PC T3 Plus
    • Lichee RV D1
    • StartFive VisionFive (has some image needs testing)

    Hack Week 22

    Hack Week 21

    Resources


    Investigate non-booting Forlinx OKMX8MX-C board (aarch64) by a_faerber

    Description

    In the context of a SUSE customer inquiry last year, a Forlinx OKMX8MX-C arm64 board had been relayed to me from China that a customer was not successful booting SUSE Linux Micro on. Typically this happens when the vendor's bootloader (e.g., U-Boot) is not configured properly (e.g., U-Boot's distro boot) to be compliant with Arm SystemReady Devicetree (formerly IR) band. Unfortunately I could not immediately get it to emit any output, to even diagnose why it wasn't working. There was no public documentation on the vendor's website to even confirm I was checking the right UARTs.

    Earlier this year (2024) I happened to meet the ODM/OEM, Forlinx, at Embedded World 2024 in Nuremberg and again the Monday before Hackweek 24 at Electronica 2024 in Munich. The big puzzle was that the PCB print "OKMX8MX-C" does not match any current Forlinx product, there being OKMX8MM-C and OKMX8MP-C products with the Mini and Plus variants of NXP i.MX 8M family instead. One suggestion from Forlinx staff was to double-check the DIP switches on the board for boot mode selection.

    Goals

    Double-check the board name and investigate further what may be wrong with this board.

    Resources

    none

    Progress

    • The board name is indeed as spelled above, not matching any product on forlinx.net.
    • The DIP switches were set to boot from microSD.
    • Changing the DIP switches to eMMC boot did result in UART1 RS-232 output! (although at times garbled with the cable supplied and USB adapter used)
    • As feared, it did not automatically load our GRUB from USB.
    • Booting our GRUB manually from USB (via eMMC U-Boot commands fatload+bootefi) was unsuccessful, with partially Chinese error messages.
    • This confirmed the initial suspicion, already shared with Forlinx at Embedded World 2024, that the Forlinx System-on-Module's boot firmware was not Arm SystemReady Devicetree compliant and that a firmware update would be necessary to remedy that.
    • The microSD card turned out not to contain a bootable image but to only include Chinese-language board documentation (dated 20220507) and BSP files. They used a diverging name of OKMX8MQ-C.