Project Description

There is some code to create database entries in the database cleaner file (spec/support/database_cleaner.rb).

These database entries should be removed from the database cleaner, and:

  • create these records in the seeds, and
  • create data migrations with these entries

Goal for this Hackweek

  • Remove the code to create database entries from the database cleaner
  • Create these records in the seeds, and
  • Create data migrations with these entries

These changes should also fix this issue: https://github.com/openSUSE/open-build-service/issues/13931

Resources

  • database_cleaner.rb script: https://github.com/openSUSE/open-build-service/blob/master/src/api/spec/support/database_cleaner.rb
  • seeds.rb script: https://github.com/openSUSE/open-build-service/blob/master/src/api/db/seeds.rb
  • Build Solutions Trello card: https://trello.com/c/WOXnpR11/2366-improve-databasecleanerrb

Looking for hackers with the skills:

obs rubyonrails

This project is part of:

Hack Week 23

Activity

  • over 1 year ago: enavarro_suse started this project.
  • over 1 year ago: enavarro_suse added keyword "obs" to this project.
  • over 1 year ago: enavarro_suse added keyword "rubyonrails" to this project.
  • over 1 year ago: enavarro_suse originated this project.

  • Comments

    • enavarro_suse
      over 1 year ago by enavarro_suse | Reply

      With these three pull requests, the project is finished:

      • https://github.com/openSUSE/open-build-service/pull/15178
      • https://github.com/openSUSE/open-build-service/pull/15180
      • https://github.com/openSUSE/open-build-service/pull/15181

    Similar Projects

    New features in openqa-trigger-from-obs for openQA by jlausuch

    Description

    Implement new features in openqa-trigger-from-obs to make xml more flexible.

    Goals

    One of the features to be implemented: - Possibility to define "VERSION" and "ARCH" variables per flavor instead of global.

    Resources

    https://github.com/os-autoinst/openqa-trigger-from-obs


    Explore the integration between OBS and GitHub by pdostal

    Project Description

    The goals:

    1) When GitHub pull request is created or modified the OBS project will be forked and the build results reported back to GitHub. 2) When new version of the GitHub project will be published the OBS will redownload the source and rebuild the project.

    Goal for this Hackweek

    Do as much as possible, blog about it and maybe use it another existing project.

    Resources


    Learn about OSB and contribute to `kustomize` and `k9s` packages to add ARM arch by dpock

    Description

    There are already k9s and kustomize packages that exist for openSUSE today. These could be used as the source for these binaries in our rancher projects. By using them we would benefit from CVE fixes included in our distribution of the packages not in cluded upstream. However they are not providing arm package builds which are required.

    Goals

    • [ ] Update the kustomize package in OBS to use the newest version and send change request

    Resources

    • k9s: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/k9s
    • kustomize: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/kustomize
    • Learning Docs: https://confluence.suse.com/display/packaging/Training%2C+Talks+and+Videos


    Automation of ABI compatibility checks by ateixeira

    Description

    ABI compatibility checks could be further automated by using the OBS API to download built RPMs and using existing tools to analyze ABI compatibility between the libraries contained in those packages. This project aims to explore these possibilities and figure out a way to make ABI checks as painless and fast as possible for package maintainers.

    Resources

    https://github.com/openSUSE/abi-compliance-checker

    https://github.com/lvc/abi-compliance-checker

    https://sourceware.org/libabigail/


    Testing and adding GNU/Linux distributions on Uyuni by juliogonzalezgil

    Join the Gitter channel! https://gitter.im/uyuni-project/hackweek

    Uyuni is a configuration and infrastructure management tool that saves you time and headaches when you have to manage and update tens, hundreds or even thousands of machines. It also manages configuration, can run audits, build image containers, monitor and much more!

    Currently there are a few distributions that are completely untested on Uyuni or SUSE Manager (AFAIK) or just not tested since a long time, and could be interesting knowing how hard would be working with them and, if possible, fix whatever is broken.

    For newcomers, the easiest distributions are those based on DEB or RPM packages. Distributions with other package formats are doable, but will require adapting the Python and Java code to be able to sync and analyze such packages (and if salt does not support those packages, it will need changes as well). So if you want a distribution with other packages, make sure you are comfortable handling such changes.

    No developer experience? No worries! We had non-developers contributors in the past, and we are ready to help as long as you are willing to learn. If you don't want to code at all, you can also help us preparing the documentation after someone else has the initial code ready, or you could also help with testing :-)

    The idea is testing Salt and Salt-ssh clients, but NOT traditional clients, which are deprecated.

    To consider that a distribution has basic support, we should cover at least (points 3-6 are to be tested for both salt minions and salt ssh minions):

    1. Reposync (this will require using spacewalk-common-channels and adding channels to the .ini file)
    2. Onboarding (salt minion from UI, salt minion from bootstrap scritp, and salt-ssh minion) (this will probably require adding OS to the bootstrap repository creator)
    3. Package management (install, remove, update...)
    4. Patching
    5. Applying any basic salt state (including a formula)
    6. Salt remote commands
    7. Bonus point: Java part for product identification, and monitoring enablement
    8. Bonus point: sumaform enablement (https://github.com/uyuni-project/sumaform)
    9. Bonus point: Documentation (https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni-docs)
    10. Bonus point: testsuite enablement (https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/tree/master/testsuite)

    If something is breaking: we can try to fix it, but the main idea is research how supported it is right now. Beyond that it's up to each project member how much to hack :-)

    • If you don't have knowledge about some of the steps: ask the team
    • If you still don't know what to do: switch to another distribution and keep testing.

    This card is for EVERYONE, not just developers. Seriously! We had people from other teams helping that were not developers, and added support for Debian and new SUSE Linux Enterprise and openSUSE Leap versions :-)

    Pending

    FUSS

    FUSS is a complete GNU/Linux solution (server, client and desktop/standalone) based on Debian for managing an educational network.

    https://fuss.bz.it/

    Seems to be a Debian 12 derivative, so adding it could be quite easy.

    • [W] Reposync (this will require using spacewalk-common-channels and adding channels to the .ini file)
    • [W] Onboarding (salt minion from UI, salt minion from bootstrap script, and salt-ssh minion) (this will probably require adding OS to the bootstrap repository creator) --> Working for all 3 options (salt minion UI, salt minion bootstrap script and salt-ssh minion from the UI).
    • [W] Package management (install, remove, update...) --> Installing a new package works, needs to test the rest.
    • [I] Patching (if patch information is available, could require writing some code to parse it, but IIRC we have support for Ubuntu already). No patches detected. Do we support patches for Debian at all?
    • [W] Applying any basic salt state (including a formula)
    • [W] Salt remote commands
    • [ ] Bonus point: Java part for product identification, and monitoring enablement


    Fix RSpec tests in order to replace the ruby-ldap rubygem in OBS by enavarro_suse

    Description

    "LDAP mode is not official supported by OBS!". See: config/options.yml.example#L100-L102

    However, there is an RSpec file which tests LDAP mode in OBS. These tests use the ruby-ldap rubygem, mocking the results returned by a LDAP server.

    The ruby-ldap rubygem seems no longer maintaned, and also prevents from updating to a more recent Ruby version. A good alternative is to replace it with the net-ldap rubygem.

    Before replacing the ruby-ldap rubygem, we should modify the tests so the don't mock the responses of a LDAP server. Instead, we should modify the tests and run them against a real LDAP server.

    Goals

    Goals of this project:

    • Modify the RSpec tests and run them against a real LDAP server
    • Replace the net-ldap rubygem with the ruby-ldap rubygem

    Achieving the above mentioned goals will:

    • Permit upgrading OBS from Ruby 3.1 to Ruby 3.2
    • Make a step towards officially supporting LDAP in OBS.

    Resources