AFAIK, wireshark is the best Linux tool for analyzing network traffic. Primarily intended for Ethernet networks, there is now also support for very different protocols (e.g. USB). Sadly, there is no support for fibre channel, most likely because there is even no infrastructure in the kernel.

I doubt I could write the complete stack within just one week. The result should be a clear plan of what needs to be done on each level and a proof-of-concept implementation of at least some parts.

Looking for hackers with the skills:

fibrechannel wireshark networking analysis kernel

This project is part of:

Hack Week 13

Activity

  • about 10 years ago: mkubecek liked this project.
  • about 10 years ago: ptesarik added keyword "kernel" to this project.
  • about 10 years ago: ptesarik added keyword "fibrechannel" to this project.
  • about 10 years ago: ptesarik added keyword "wireshark" to this project.
  • about 10 years ago: ptesarik added keyword "networking" to this project.
  • about 10 years ago: ptesarik added keyword "analysis" to this project.
  • about 10 years ago: ptesarik started this project.
  • about 10 years ago: ptesarik originated this project.

  • Comments

    Be the first to comment!

    Similar Projects

    Is SUSE Trending? Popularity and Developer Sentiment Insight Using Native AI Capabilities by terezacerna

    Description

    This project aims to explore the popularity and developer sentiment around SUSE and its technologies compared to Red Hat and their technologies. Using publicly available data sources, I will analyze search trends, developer preferences, repository activity, and media presence. The final outcome will be an interactive Power BI dashboard that provides insights into how SUSE is perceived and discussed across the web and among developers.

    Goals

    1. Assess the popularity of SUSE products and brand compared to Red Hat using Google Trends.
    2. Analyze developer satisfaction and usage trends from the Stack Overflow Developer Survey.
    3. Use the GitHub API to compare SUSE and Red Hat repositories in terms of stars, forks, contributors, and issue activity.
    4. Perform sentiment analysis on GitHub issue comments to measure community tone and engagement using built-in Copilot capabilities.
    5. Perform sentiment analysis on Reddit comments related to SUSE technologies using built-in Copilot capabilities.
    6. Use Gnews.io to track and compare the volume of news articles mentioning SUSE and Red Hat technologies.
    7. Test the integration of Copilot (AI) within Power BI for enhanced data analysis and visualization.
    8. Deliver a comprehensive Power BI report summarizing findings and insights.
    9. Test the full potential of Power BI, including its AI features and native language Q&A.

    Resources

    1. Google Trends: Web scraping for search popularity data
    2. Stack Overflow Developer Survey: For technology popularity and satisfaction comparison
    3. GitHub API: For repository data (stars, forks, contributors, issues, comments).
    4. Gnews.io API: For article volume and mentions analysis.
    5. Reddit: SUSE related topics with comments.


    Add Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (SM7250) basic device tree to mainline linux kernel by pvorel

    Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (SM7250) (smartphone SoC) has no support in the linux kernel, nor in u-boot. Try to add basic device tree support. The hardest part will be to create boot.img which will be accepted by phone.

    UART is available for smartphone :).


    bpftrace contribution by mkoutny

    Description

    bpftrace is a great tool, no need to sing odes to it here. It can access any kernel data and process them in real time. It provides helpers for some common Linux kernel structures but not all.

    Goals

    • set up bpftrace toolchain
    • learn about bpftrace implementation and internals
    • implement support for percpu_counters
    • look into some of the first issues
    • send a refined PR (on Thu)

    Resources


    dynticks-testing: analyse perf / trace-cmd output and aggregate data by m.crivellari

    Description

    dynticks-testing is a project started years ago by Frederic Weisbecker. One of the feature is to check the actual configuration (isolcpus, irqaffinity etc etc) and give feedback on it.

    An important goal of this tool is to parse the output of trace-cmd / perf and provide more readable data, showing the duration of every events grouped by PID (showing also the CPU number, if the tasks has been migrated etc).

    An example of data captured on my laptop (incomplete!!):

              -0     [005] dN.2. 20310.270699: sched_wakeup:         WaylandProxy:46380 [120] CPU:005
              -0     [005] d..2. 20310.270702: sched_switch:         swapper/5:0 [120] R ==> WaylandProxy:46380 [120]
    ...
        WaylandProxy-46380 [004] d..2. 20310.295397: sched_switch:         WaylandProxy:46380 [120] S ==> swapper/4:0 [120]
              -0     [006] d..2. 20310.295397: sched_switch:         swapper/6:0 [120] R ==> firefox:46373 [120]
             firefox-46373 [006] d..2. 20310.295408: sched_switch:         firefox:46373 [120] S ==> swapper/6:0 [120]
              -0     [004] dN.2. 20310.295466: sched_wakeup:         WaylandProxy:46380 [120] CPU:004
    

    Output of noise_parse.py:

    Task: WaylandProxy Pid: 46380 cpus: {4, 5} (Migrated!!!)
            Wakeup Latency                                Nr:        24     Duration:          89
            Sched switch: kworker/12:2                    Nr:         1     Duration:           6
    

    My first contribution is around Nov. 2024!

    Goals

    • add more features (eg cpuset)
    • test / bugfix

    Resources

    Progresses

    isolcpus and cpusets implemented and merged in master: dynticks-testing.git commit


    pudc - A PID 1 process that barks to the internet by mssola

    Description

    As a fun exercise in order to dig deeper into the Linux kernel, its interfaces, the RISC-V architecture, and all the dragons in between; I'm building a blog site cooked like this:

    • The backend is written in a mixture of C and RISC-V assembly.
    • The backend is actually PID1 (for real, not within a container).
    • We poll and parse incoming HTTP requests ourselves.
    • The frontend is a mere HTML page with htmx.

    The project is meant to be Linux-specific, so I'm going to use io_uring, pidfs, namespaces, and Linux-specific features in order to drive all of this.

    I'm open for suggestions and so on, but this is meant to be a solo project, as this is more of a learning exercise for me than anything else.

    Goals

    • Have a better understanding of different Linux features from user space down to the kernel internals.
    • Most importantly: have fun.

    Resources


    Backporting patches using LLM by jankara

    Description

    Backporting Linux kernel fixes (either for CVE issues or as part of general git-fixes workflow) is boring and mostly mechanical work (dealing with changes in context, renamed variables, new helper functions etc.). The idea of this project is to explore usage of LLM for backporting Linux kernel commits to SUSE kernels using LLM.

    Goals

    • Create safe environment allowing LLM to run and backport patches without exposing the whole filesystem to it (for privacy and security reasons).
    • Write prompt that will guide LLM through the backporting process. Fine tune it based on experimental results.
    • Explore success rate of LLMs when backporting various patches.

    Resources

    • Docker
    • Gemini CLI

    Repository

    Current version of the container with some instructions for use are at: https://gitlab.suse.de/jankara/gemini-cli-backporter