Gen-AI chatbots and test-automation of generated responses
a project by mdati
Updated 4 months ago. 1 hackers ♥️. 1 follower.

Description

Start experimenting the generative SUSE-AI chat bot, asking questions on different areas of knowledge or science and possibly analyze the quality of the LLM model response, specific and comparative, checking the answers provided by different LLM models to a same query, using proper quality metrics or tools or methodologies.

Try to define basic guidelines and requirements for quality test automation of AI-generated responses.

First approach of investigation can be based on manual testing: methodologies, findings and data can be useful then to organize valid automated testing.

Goals

  • Identify criteria and measuring scales for assessment of a text content.
  • Define quality of an answer/text based on defined criteria .
  • Identify some knowledge sectors and a proper list of problems/questions per sector.
  • Manually run query session and apply evaluation criteria to answers.
  • Draft requirements for test automation of AI answers.

Resources

  • Announcement of SUSE-AI for Hack Week in Slack
  • Openplatform and related 3 LLM models gemma:2b, llama3.1:8b, qwen2.5-coder:3b.

Notes

  • Foundation models (FMs):
    are large deep learning neural networks, trained on massive datasets, that have changed the way data scientists approach machine learning (ML). Rather than develop artificial intelligence (AI) from scratch, data scientists use a foundation model as a starting point to develop ML models that power new applications more quickly and cost-effectively.

  • Large language models (LLMs):
    are a category of foundation models pre-trained on immense amounts of data acquiring abilities by learning statistical relationships from vast amounts of text during a self- and semi-supervised training process, making them capable of understanding and generating natural language and other types of content , to perform a wide range of tasks.
    LLMs can be used for generative AI (artificial intelligence) to produce content based on input prompts in human language.

Validation of a AI-generated answer is not an easy task to perform, as manually as automated.
An LLM answer text shall contain a given level of informations: correcness, completeness, reasoning description etc.
We shall rely in properly applicable and measurable criteria of validation to get an assessment in a limited amount of time and resources.

Join this project

Looking for hackers with the skills:

ai llm

This project is part of:

Hack Week 24

Activity

  • 3 months ago: mdati added keyword "llm" to this project.
  • 3 months ago: mdati added keyword "ai" to this project.
  • 4 months ago: mdati liked this project.
  • 4 months ago: mdati started this project.
  • 4 months ago: mdati originated this project.


    • Comments

    • livdywan
      4 months ago by livdywan | Reply

      You might want to add an ai tag

    Similar Projects

    Run local LLMs with Ollama and explore possible integrations with Uyuni by PSuarezHernandez

    Description

    Using Ollama you can easily run different LLM models in your local computer. This project is about exploring Ollama, testing different LLMs and try to fine tune them. Also, explore potential ways of integration with Uyuni.

    Goals

    • Explore Ollama
    • Test different models
    • Fine tuning
    • Explore possible integration in Uyuni

    Resources

    • https://ollama.com/
    • https://huggingface.co/
    • https://apeatling.com/articles/part-2-building-your-training-data-for-fine-tuning/

    COOTWbot by ngetahun

    Project Description

    At SCC, we have a rotating task of COOTW (Commanding Office of the Week). This task involves responding to customer requests from jira and slack help channels, monitoring production systems and doing small chores. Usually, we have documentation to help the COOTW answer questions and quickly find fixes. Most of these are distributed across github, trello and SUSE Support documentation. The aim of this project is to explore the magic of LLMs and create a conversational bot.

    Goal for this Hackweek

    • Build data ingestion Data source:
      • SUSE KB docs
      • scc github docs
      • scc trello knowledge board

    • Test out new RAG architecture

    • https://gitlab.suse.de/ngetahun/cootwbot

    Automated Test Report reviewer by oscar-barrios

    Description

    In SUMA/Uyuni team we spend a lot of time reviewing test reports, analyzing each of the test cases failing, checking if the test is a flaky test, checking logs, etc.

    Goals

    Speed up the review by automating some parts through AI, in a way that we can consume some summary of that report that could be meaningful for the reviewer.

    Resources

    No idea about the resources yet, but we will make use of:

    • HTML/JSON Report (text + screenshots)
    • The Test Suite Status GithHub board (via API)
    • The environment tested (via SSH)
    • The test framework code (via files)

    Make more sense of openQA test results using AI by livdywan

    Description

    AI has the potential to help with something many of us spend a lot of time doing which is making sense of openQA logs when a job fails.

    User Story

    Allison Average has a puzzled look on their face while staring at log files that seem to make little sense. Is this a known issue, something completely new or maybe related to infrastructure changes?

    Goals

    • Leverage a chat interface to help Allison
    • Create a model from scratch based on data from openQA
    • Proof of concept for automated analysis of openQA test results

    Bonus

    • Use AI to suggest solutions to merge conflicts
      • This would need a merge conflict editor that can suggest solving the conflict
    • Use image recognition for needles

    Resources

    Timeline

    Day 1

    • Conversing with open-webui to teach me how to create a model based on openQA test results

    Day 2

    Highlights

    • I briefly tested compared models to see if they would make me more productive. Between llama, gemma and mistral there was no amazing difference in the results for my case.
    • Convincing the chat interface to produce code specific to my use case required very explicit instructions.
    • Asking for advice on how to use open-webui itself better was frustratingly unfruitful both in trivial and more advanced regards.
    • Documentation on source materials used by LLM's and tools for this purpose seems virtually non-existent - specifically if a logo can be generated based on particular licenses

    Outcomes

    • Chat interface-supported development is providing good starting points and open-webui being open source is more flexible than Gemini. Although currently some fancy features such as grounding and generated podcasts are missing.
    • Allison still has to be very experienced with openQA to use a chat interface for test review. Publicly available system prompts would make that easier, though.

    ghostwrAIter - a local AI assisted tool for helping with support cases by paolodepa

    Description

    This project is meant to fight the loneliness of the support team members, providing them an AI assistant (hopefully) capable of scraping supportconfigs in a RAG fashion, trying to answer specific questions.

    Goals

    • Setup an Ollama backend, spinning one (or more??) code-focused LLMs selected by license, performance and quality of the results between:
    • Setup a Web UI for it, choosing an easily extensible and customizable option between:
    • Extend the solution in order to be able to:
      • Add ZIU/Concord shared folders to its RAG context
      • Add BZ cases, splitted in comments to its RAG context
        • A plus would be to login using the IDP portal to ghostwrAIter itself and use the same credentials to query BZ
      • Add specific packages picking them from IBS repos
        • A plus would be to login using the IDP portal to ghostwrAIter itself and use the same credentials to query IBS
        • A plus would be to desume the packages of interest and the right channel and version to be picked from the added BZ cases

    Run local LLMs with Ollama and explore possible integrations with Uyuni by PSuarezHernandez

    Description

    Using Ollama you can easily run different LLM models in your local computer. This project is about exploring Ollama, testing different LLMs and try to fine tune them. Also, explore potential ways of integration with Uyuni.

    Goals

    • Explore Ollama
    • Test different models
    • Fine tuning
    • Explore possible integration in Uyuni

    Resources

    • https://ollama.com/
    • https://huggingface.co/
    • https://apeatling.com/articles/part-2-building-your-training-data-for-fine-tuning/

    COOTWbot by ngetahun

    Project Description

    At SCC, we have a rotating task of COOTW (Commanding Office of the Week). This task involves responding to customer requests from jira and slack help channels, monitoring production systems and doing small chores. Usually, we have documentation to help the COOTW answer questions and quickly find fixes. Most of these are distributed across github, trello and SUSE Support documentation. The aim of this project is to explore the magic of LLMs and create a conversational bot.

    Goal for this Hackweek

    • Build data ingestion Data source:
      • SUSE KB docs
      • scc github docs
      • scc trello knowledge board

    • Test out new RAG architecture

    • https://gitlab.suse.de/ngetahun/cootwbot