Project Description
Generate a personalized avatar artwork images by fine-tuning stable diffusion on personal pictures
Goal for this Hackweek
Get a new fancy and unique avatar!
Resources
- https://huggingface.co/docs/diffusers/using-diffusers/sdxl
- https://huggingface.co/docs/diffusers/training/dreambooth
- https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/main/examples/dreambooth/README_sdxl.md
- https://civitai.com/models/133005/juggernaut-xl?modelVersionId=198530
Looking for hackers with the skills:
This project is part of:
Hack Week 23
Activity
Comments
-
-
about 1 year ago by STorresi | Reply
These are generated after a bespoke LoRA training using DreamBooth over the JuggernautXL model, which in turn is based on SDXL 1.0.
As you can see, hands are still tricky (a known issue of diffusion models, apparently), but I didn't try inpainting and img2img fine-tuning, which are supposed to be the go-to way to solve small issues like that. I must say the overall experience was quite painful due to the hardware requirements of SDXL and the amount of memory leaks in pytorch. A high-end consumer grade GPU like an NVIDIA 4080 with 16GB of VRAM often wasn't enough and ran OOM.
Similar Projects
Make more sense of openQA test results using AI by livdywan
Description
AI has the potential to help with something many of us spend a lot of time doing which is making sense of openQA logs when a job fails.
User Story
Allison Average has a puzzled look on their face while staring at log files that seem to make little sense. Is this a known issue, something completely new or maybe related to infrastructure changes?
Goals
- Leverage a chat interface to help Allison
- Create a model from scratch based on data from openQA
- Proof of concept for automated analysis of openQA test results
Bonus
- Use AI to suggest solutions to merge conflicts
- This would need a merge conflict editor that can suggest solving the conflict
- Use image recognition for needles
Resources
Timeline
Day 1
- Conversing with open-webui to teach me how to create a model based on openQA test results
- Asking for example code using TensorFlow in Python
- Discussing log files to explore what to analyze
- Drafting a new project called Testimony (based on Implementing a containerized Python action) - the project name was also suggested by the assistant
Day 2
- Using NotebookLLM (Gemini) to produce conversational versions of blog posts
- Researching the possibility of creating a project logo with AI
- Asking open-webui, persons with prior experience and conducting a web search for advice
Highlights
- I briefly tested compared models to see if they would make me more productive. Between llama, gemma and mistral there was no amazing difference in the results for my case.
- Convincing the chat interface to produce code specific to my use case required very explicit instructions.
- Asking for advice on how to use open-webui itself better was frustratingly unfruitful both in trivial and more advanced regards.
- Documentation on source materials used by LLM's and tools for this purpose seems virtually non-existent - specifically if a logo can be generated based on particular licenses
Outcomes
- Chat interface-supported development is providing good starting points and open-webui being open source is more flexible than Gemini. Although currently some fancy features such as grounding and generated podcasts are missing.
- Allison still has to be very experienced with openQA to use a chat interface for test review. Publicly available system prompts would make that easier, though.
Learn how to integrate Elixir and Phoenix Liveview with LLMs by ninopaparo
Description
Learn how to integrate Elixir and Phoenix Liveview with LLMs by building an application that can provide answers to user queries based on a corpus of custom-trained data.
Goals
Develop an Elixir application via the Phoenix framework that:
- Employs Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques
- Supports the integration and utilization of various Large Language Models (LLMs).
- Is designed with extensibility and adaptability in mind to accommodate future enhancements and modifications.
Resources
- https://elixir-lang.org/
- https://www.phoenixframework.org/
- https://github.com/elixir-nx/bumblebee
- https://ollama.com/
Save pytorch models in OCI registries by jguilhermevanz
Description
A prerequisite for running applications in a cloud environment is the presence of a container registry. Another common scenario is users performing machine learning workloads in such environments. However, these types of workloads require dedicated infrastructure to run properly. We can leverage these two facts to help users save resources by storing their machine learning models in OCI registries, similar to how we handle some WebAssembly modules. This approach will save users the resources typically required for a machine learning model repository for the applications they need to run.
Goals
Allow PyTorch users to save and load machine learning models in OCI registries.
Resources
Use AI tools to convert legacy perl scripts to bash by nadvornik
Description
Use AI tools to convert legacy perl scripts to bash
Goals
Uyuni project contains legacy perl scripts used for setup. The perl dependency could be removed, to reduce the container size. The goal of this project is to research use of AI tools for this task.
Resources
Results:
Aider is not the right tool for this. It works ok for small changes, but not for complete rewrite from one language to another.
I got better results with direct API use from script.
Gen-AI chatbots and test-automation of generated responses by mdati
Description
Start experimenting the generative SUSE-AI chat bot, asking questions on different areas of knowledge or science and possibly analyze the quality of the LLM model response, specific and comparative, checking the answers provided by different LLM models to a same query, using proper quality metrics or tools or methodologies.
Try to define basic guidelines and requirements for quality test automation of AI-generated responses.
First approach of investigation can be based on manual testing: methodologies, findings and data can be useful then to organize valid automated testing.
Goals
- Identify criteria and measuring scales for assessment of a text content.
- Define quality of an answer/text based on defined criteria .
- Identify some knowledge sectors and a proper list of problems/questions per sector.
- Manually run query session and apply evaluation criteria to answers.
- Draft requirements for test automation of AI answers.
Resources
- Announcement of SUSE-AI for Hack Week in Slack
- Openplatform and related 3 LLM models gemma:2b, llama3.1:8b, qwen2.5-coder:3b.
Notes
Foundation models (FMs):
are large deep learning neural networks, trained on massive datasets, that have changed the way data scientists approach machine learning (ML). Rather than develop artificial intelligence (AI) from scratch, data scientists use a foundation model as a starting point to develop ML models that power new applications more quickly and cost-effectively.Large language models (LLMs):
are a category of foundation models pre-trained on immense amounts of data acquiring abilities by learning statistical relationships from vast amounts of text during a self- and semi-supervised training process, making them capable of understanding and generating natural language and other types of content , to perform a wide range of tasks.
LLMs can be used for generative AI (artificial intelligence) to produce content based on input prompts in human language.
Validation of a AI-generated answer is not an easy task to perform, as manually as automated.
An LLM answer text shall contain a given level of informations: correcness, completeness, reasoning description etc.
We shall rely in properly applicable and measurable criteria of validation to get an assessment in a limited amount of time and resources.