Project Description
BPF verifier plays a crucial role in securing the system (though less so now that unprivileged BPF is disabled by default in both upstream and SLES), and bugs in the verifier has lead to privilege escalation vulnerabilities in the past (e.g. CVE-2021-3490).
One way to check whether the verifer has bugs to use model checking (a formal verification technique), in other words, build a abstract model of how the verifier operates, and then see if certain condition can occur (e.g. incorrect calculation during value tracking of registers) by giving both the model and condition to a solver.
For the solver I will be using the Z3 SMT solver to do the checking since it provide a Python binding that's relatively easy to use.
Goal for this Hackweek
Learn how to use the Z3 Python binding (i.e. Z3Py) to build a model of (part of) the BPF verifier, probably the part that's related to value tracking using tristate numbers (aka tnum), and then check that the algorithm work as intended.
Resources
- Formal Methods for the Informal Engineer: Tutorial #1 - The Z3 Theorem Prover and its accompanying notebook is a great introduction into Z3
- Has a section specifically on model checking
- Software Verification and Analysis Using Z3 a great example of using Z3 for model checking
- Sound, Precise, and Fast Abstract Interpretation with Tristate Numbers - existing work that use formal verification to prove that the multiplication helper used for value tracking work as intended
- [PATCH v5 net-next 00/12] bpf: rewrite value tracking in verifier - initial patch set that adds tristate number to the verifier
Looking for hackers with the skills:
This project is part of:
Hack Week 21 Hack Week 23 Hack Week 24
Activity
Comments
-
over 2 years ago by shunghsiyu | Reply
I've uploaded the jupyter notebook on GitHub that contains a minimal model of tnum along with tnum_add(), as well as the prove that it works.
-
over 2 years ago by shunghsiyu | Reply
The slides used for lightning talk can be found here
While I'd like to achieve much more, I think what I've done during hack week is suffice to be called a complete project, so I'm marking this as complete
-
about 1 year ago by shunghsiyu | Reply
I'm restarting this project to model check the range tracking (minimal and maximal value possible in s32/u32/u64/s64 range) done in BPF verifier.
In addition to that I hope to unify signed and unsigned range tracking based on previously posted idea and the "Interval Analysis and Machine Arithmetic: Why Signedness Ignorance Is Bliss" paper for simpler range tracking code.
Similar Projects
Tracing system calls with eBPF by doreilly
Description
Many security tools need to record system calls like execve. Using the Linux audit system for this can have a detrimental performance impact in some cases.
Goals
The goal is to investigate eBPF as an alternative and do some benchmarking to see the impact and how it compares to using the audit subsystem.
Progress
BPF done - traceexec
Resources
Tracing system calls with eBPF by doreilly
Description
Many security tools need to record system calls like execve. Using the Linux audit system for this can have a detrimental performance impact in some cases.
Goals
The goal is to investigate eBPF as an alternative and do some benchmarking to see the impact and how it compares to using the audit subsystem.
Progress
BPF done - traceexec
Resources
Officially Become a Kernel Hacker! by m.crivellari
Description
My studies as well my spare time are dedicated to the Linux Kernel. Currently I'm focusing on interrupts on x86_64, but my interests are not restricted to one specific topic, for now.
I also "played" a little bit with kernel modules (ie lantern, a toy packet analyzer) and I've added a new syscall in order read from a task A, the memory of a task B.
Maybe this will be a good chance to...
Goals
- create my first kernel patch
Resources
- https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html
- https://git-send-email.io/ (mentioned also in the kernel doc)
- https://javiercarrascocruz.github.io/kernel-contributor-1
Achivements
- found while working on a bug, this is the 1st patch: cifs: avoid deadlocks while updating iface [✅ has been merged]
Contributing to Linux Kernel security by pperego
Description
A couple of weeks ago, I found this blog post by Gustavo Silva, a Linux Kernel contributor.
I always strived to start again into hacking the Linux Kernel, so I asked Coverity scan dashboard access and I want to contribute to Linux Kernel by fixing some minor issues.
I want also to create a Linux Kernel fuzzing lab using qemu and syzkaller
Goals
- Fix at least 2 security bugs
- Create the fuzzing lab and having it running
The story so far
- Day 1: setting up a virtual machine for kernel development using Tumbleweed. Reading a lot of documentation, taking confidence with Coverity dashboard and with procedures to submit a kernel patch
- Day 2: I read really a lot of documentation and I triaged some findings on Coverity SAST dashboard. I have to confirm that SAST tool are great false positives generator, even for low hanging fruits.
- Day 3: Working on trivial changes after I read this blog post:
https://www.toblux.com/posts/2024/02/linux-kernel-patches.html. I have to take confidence
with the patch preparation and submit process yet.
- First trivial patch sent: using strtruefalse() macro instead of hard-coded strings in a staging driver for a lcd display
- Fix for a dereference before null check issue discovered by Coverity (CID 1601566) https://scan7.scan.coverity.com/#/project-view/52110/11354?selectedIssue=1601566
- Day 4: Triaging more issues found by Coverity.
- The patch for CID 1601566 was refused. The check against the NULL pointer was pointless so I prepared a version 2 of the patch removing the check.
- Fixed another dereference before NULL check in iwlmvmparsewowlaninfo_notif() routine (CID 1601547). This one was already submitted by another kernel hacker :(
- Day 5: Wrapping up. I had to do some minor rework on patch for CID 1601566. I found a stalker bothering me in private emails and people I interacted with me, advised he is a well known bothering person. Markus Elfring for the record.
Wrapping up: being back doing kernel hacking is amazing and I don't want to stop it. My battery pack is completely drained but changing the scope gave me a great twist and I really want to feel this energy not doing a single task for months.
I failed in setting up a fuzzing lab but I was too optimistic for the patch submission process.
The patches
FizzBuzz OS by mssola
Project Description
FizzBuzz OS (or just fbos) is an idea I've had in order to better grasp the fundamentals of the low level of a RISC-V machine. In practice, I'd like to build a small Operating System kernel that is able to launch three processes: one that simply prints "Fizz", another that prints "Buzz", and the third which prints "FizzBuzz". These processes are unaware of each other and it's up to the kernel to schedule them by using the timer interrupts as given on openSBI (fizz on % 3 seconds, buzz on % 5 seconds, and fizzbuzz on % 15 seconds).
This kernel provides just one system call, write, which allows any program to pass the string to be written into stdout.
This project is free software and you can find it here.
Goal for this Hackweek
- Better understand the RISC-V SBI interface.
- Better understand RISC-V in privileged mode.
- Have fun.
Resources
Results
The project was a resounding success 
Lots of learning, and the initial target was met.
Create DRM drivers for VESA and EFI framebuffers by tdz
Description
We already have simpledrm for firmware framebuffers. But the driver is originally for ARM boards, not PCs. It is already overloaded with code to support both use cases. At the same time it is missing possible features for VESA and EFI, such as palette modes or EDID support. We should have DRM drivers for VESA and EFI interfaces. The infrastructure exists already and initial drivers can be forked from simpledrm.
Goals
- Initially, a bare driver for VESA or EFI should be created. It can take functionality from simpledrm.
- Then we can begin to add additional features. The boot loader can provide EDID data. With VGA hardware, VESA can support paletted modes or color management. Example code exists in vesafb.
Improve various phones kernel mainline support (Qualcomm, Exynos, MediaTek) by pvorel
Similar to previous hackweeks ( https://hackweek.opensuse.org/projects/improve-qualcomm-soc-msm8994-slash-msm8992-kernel-mainline-support, https://hackweek.opensuse.org/projects/test-mainline-kernel-on-an-older-qualcomm-soc-msm89xx-explore-mainline-kernel-qualcomm-mainlining) try to improve kernel mainline support of various phones.
OIDC Loginproxy by toe
Description
Reverse proxies can be a useful option to separate authentication logic from application logic. SUSE and openSUSE use "loginproxies" as an authentication layer in front of several services.
Currently, loginproxies exist which support LDAP authentication or SAML authentication.
Goals
The goal of this Hack Week project is, to create another loginproxy which supports OpenID Connect authentication which can then act as a drop-in replacement for the existing LDAP or SAML loginproxies.
Testing is intended to focus on the integration with OIDC IDPs from Okta, KanIDM and Authentik.
Resources
Migrate from Docker to Podman by tjyrinki_suse
Description
I'd like to continue my former work on containerization of several domains on a single server by changing from Docker containers to Podman containers. That will need an OS upgrade as well as Podman is not available in that old server version.
Goals
- Update OS.
- Migrate from Docker to Podman.
- Keep everything functional, including the existing "meanwhile done" additional Docker container that is actually being used already.
- Keep everything at least as secure as currently. One of the reasons of having the containers is to isolate risks related to services open to public Internet.
- Try to enable the Podman use in production.
- At minimum, learn about all of these topics.
- Optionally, improve Ansible side of things as well...
Resources
A search engine is one's friend. Migrating from Docker to Podman, and from docker-compose to podman-compose.
CVE portal for SUSE Rancher products by gmacedo
Description
Currently it's a bit difficult for users to quickly see the list of CVEs affecting images in Rancher, RKE2, Harvester and Longhorn releases. Users need to individually look for each CVE in the SUSE CVE database page - https://www.suse.com/security/cve/ . This is not optimal, because those CVE pages are a bit hard to read and contain data for all SLE and BCI products too, making it difficult to easily see only the CVEs affecting the latest release of Rancher, for example. We understand that certain costumers are only looking for CVE data for Rancher and not SLE or BCI.
Goals
The objective is to create a simple to read and navigate page that contains only CVE data related to Rancher, RKE2, Harvester and Longhorn, where it's easy to search by a CVE ID, an image name or a release version. The page should also provide the raw data as an exportable CSV file.
It must be an MVP with the minimal amount of effort/time invested, but still providing great value to our users and saving the wasted time that the Rancher Security team needs to spend by manually sharing such data. It might not be long lived, as it can be replaced in 2-3 years with a better SUSE wide solution.
Resources
- The page must be simple and easy to read.
- The UI/UX must be as straightforward as possible with minimal visual noise.
- The content must be created automatically from the raw data that we already have internally.
- It must be updated automatically on a daily basis and on ad-hoc runs (when needed).
- The CVE status must be aligned with VEX.
- The raw data must be exportable as CSV file.
- Ideally it will be written in Go or pure Shell script with basic HTML and no external dependencies in CSS or JS.
Contributing to Linux Kernel security by pperego
Description
A couple of weeks ago, I found this blog post by Gustavo Silva, a Linux Kernel contributor.
I always strived to start again into hacking the Linux Kernel, so I asked Coverity scan dashboard access and I want to contribute to Linux Kernel by fixing some minor issues.
I want also to create a Linux Kernel fuzzing lab using qemu and syzkaller
Goals
- Fix at least 2 security bugs
- Create the fuzzing lab and having it running
The story so far
- Day 1: setting up a virtual machine for kernel development using Tumbleweed. Reading a lot of documentation, taking confidence with Coverity dashboard and with procedures to submit a kernel patch
- Day 2: I read really a lot of documentation and I triaged some findings on Coverity SAST dashboard. I have to confirm that SAST tool are great false positives generator, even for low hanging fruits.
- Day 3: Working on trivial changes after I read this blog post:
https://www.toblux.com/posts/2024/02/linux-kernel-patches.html. I have to take confidence
with the patch preparation and submit process yet.
- First trivial patch sent: using strtruefalse() macro instead of hard-coded strings in a staging driver for a lcd display
- Fix for a dereference before null check issue discovered by Coverity (CID 1601566) https://scan7.scan.coverity.com/#/project-view/52110/11354?selectedIssue=1601566
- Day 4: Triaging more issues found by Coverity.
- The patch for CID 1601566 was refused. The check against the NULL pointer was pointless so I prepared a version 2 of the patch removing the check.
- Fixed another dereference before NULL check in iwlmvmparsewowlaninfo_notif() routine (CID 1601547). This one was already submitted by another kernel hacker :(
- Day 5: Wrapping up. I had to do some minor rework on patch for CID 1601566. I found a stalker bothering me in private emails and people I interacted with me, advised he is a well known bothering person. Markus Elfring for the record.
Wrapping up: being back doing kernel hacking is amazing and I don't want to stop it. My battery pack is completely drained but changing the scope gave me a great twist and I really want to feel this energy not doing a single task for months.
I failed in setting up a fuzzing lab but I was too optimistic for the patch submission process.
The patches
Bot to identify reserved data leak in local files or when publishing on remote repository by mdati
Description
Scope here is to prevent reserved data or generally "unwanted", to be pushed and saved on a public repository, i.e. on Github, causing disclosure or leaking of reserved informations.
The above definition of reserved or "unwanted" may vary, depending on the context: sometime secret keys or password are stored in data or configuration files or hardcoded in source code and depending on the scope of the archive or the level of security, it can be either wanted, permitted or not at all.
As main target here, secrets will be registration keys or passwords, to be detected and managed locally or in a C.I. pipeline.
Goals
Detection:
- Local detection: detect secret words present in local files;
- Remote detection: detect secrets in files, in pipelines, going to be transferred on a remote repository, i.e. via
git push;
Reporting:
- report the result of detection on stderr and/or log files, noticed excluding the secret values.
Acton:
- Manage the detection, by either deleting or masking the impacted code or deleting/moving the file itself or simply notify it.
Resources
- Project repository, published on Github (link): m-dati/hkwk24;
- Reference folder: hkwk24/chksecret;
- First pull request (link): PR#1;
- Second PR, for improvements: PR#2;
- README.md and TESTS.md documentation files available in the repo root;
- Test subproject repository, for testing CI on push [TBD].
Notes
We use here some examples of secret words, that still can be improved.
The various patterns to match desired reserved words are written in a separated module, to be on demand updated or customized.
[Legend: TBD = to be done]