A sane DSL for udev rules by mwilck

Description

The "language" in which udev rules are written as documented in udev(7) is horrible. To name just a few problems:

• The only control statements are LABEL and GOTO.
• Conditionals are the most important part of the language, but it supports only conjunction ("AND"), forcing developers to use GOTO even for simple "OR" relations.
• The AND operation is denoted by a comma (,).
• Conventions for quoting are weird.
• There aren't even basic string handling facilities.
• There is no API for passing flags between different rule sets, just a set of global environment variables.
• Environment variales are written in ENV{FOO} when assigned to, but $env{FOO} or %E{FOO} when dereferenced.

While this is ok-ish for the simple set of tasks the language was originally intended for, it makes larger rule sets with complex logic almost impossible to read and understand. Examples for such complex rule sets are the device-mapper and multipath rules.

While working on the multipath rule sets a few weeks ago, I found myself desparately translating the rules into some pythonesque pseudo-code in order to make sure I fully understand the code flow.

This project wants to explore the possibilities to replace this weird DSL with something saner. The idea is to embed Lua in udev, and rewrite the udev rule sets as Lua modules.

It's meant as a fun project that may have practical merits. I am aware that it's questionable whether the systemd maintainers are going to embrace this. I think it will only have a tiny chance if it really improves readability of rules massively, while impacting neither performance nor code size too badly. I have good hopes in terms of performance as Lua has the reputation to be fast, but code size will of course increase, and so will the list of dependencies of systemd.

Goals

1. Learn how to write Lua, and how to embed it in C code and write C modules for it. I've read the manual, but I can't say that I'm fluent with it yet.
2. Design an API for udev in Lua. Figure out how to expose status like device properties (environment variables), tags, and other variables like ACTION and SUBSYSTEM to Lua code, and tentatively re-write a set of representative rule sets in this new DSL. This may need several attempts until the rules can be written in an intuitive way.
3. Create the basic framework for embedding Lua in udev and providing the environment for the Lua code.
4. Write libraries with helper funtions to be used by the Lua. For example, we'll need code to access sysfs in order to provide ATTRS and similar features of udev. I'm not certain yet but for most of this it will probably make sense to write the code in C and make it callable by Lua, as udev already has powerful mechanisms for accessing sysfs attributes.
5. One problem is that the Lua standard library provides getenv but not setenv. We need to be able to set environment variables in order to work with external programs to replicate the functionality of the PROGRAM and IMPORT{program} directives.
6. Eventually, make the entire feature set of the udev language available.
7. Eventually, rewrite the entire set of upstream rules (to the extent we're aware of) in Lua.
8. While I'd love trash the original language, I guess it needs to continue to exist.

---

Run local LLMs with Ollama and explore possible integrations with Uyuni by PSuarezHernandez

Description

Using Ollama you can easily run different LLM models in your local computer. This project is about exploring Ollama, testing different LLMs and try to fine tune them. Also, explore potential ways of integration with Uyuni.

Goals

• Explore Ollama
• Test different models
• Fine tuning
• Explore possible integration in Uyuni

Resources

• https://ollama.com/
• https://huggingface.co/
• https://apeatling.com/articles/part-2-building-your-training-data-for-fine-tuning/

---

Ansible for add-on management by lmanfredi

Description

Machines can contains various combinations of add-ons and are often modified during the time.

The list of repos can change so I would like to create an automation able to reset the status to a given state, based on metadata available for these machines

Goals

Create an Ansible automation able to take care of add-on (repo list) configuration using metadata as reference

Resources

• Machines
• Repositories
• Developing modules
• Basic VM Guest management
• Module zypper_repository_list
• ansible-collections community.general
  • plugins/modules/zypper.py
  • plugins/modules/zypper_repository.py
  • plugins/modules/zypperrepositoryinfo.py

Results

Created WIP project Ansible-add-on-openSUSE

---

Saline (state deployment control and monitoring tool for SUSE Manager/Uyuni) by vizhestkov

Project Description

Saline is an addition for salt used in SUSE Manager/Uyuni aimed to provide better control and visibility for states deploymend in the large scale environments.

In current state the published version can be used only as a Prometheus exporter and missing some of the key features implemented in PoC (not published). Now it can provide metrics related to salt events and state apply process on the minions. But there is no control on this process implemented yet.

Continue with implementation of the missing features and improve the existing implementation:

• authentication (need to decide how it should be/or not related to salt auth)

• web service providing the control of states deployment

Goal for this Hackweek

• Implement missing key features

• Implement the tool for state deployment control with CLI

Resources

https://github.com/openSUSE/saline

---

Team Hedgehogs' Data Observability Dashboard by gsamardzhiev

Description

This project aims to develop a comprehensive Data Observability Dashboard that provides r insights into key aspects of data quality and reliability. The dashboard will track:

Data Freshness: Monitor when data was last updated and flag potential delays.

Data Volume: Track table row counts to detect unexpected surges or drops in data.

Data Distribution: Analyze data for null values, outliers, and anomalies to ensure accuracy.

Data Schema: Track schema changes over time to prevent breaking changes.

The dashboard's aim is to support historical tracking to support proactive data management and enhance data trust across the data function.

Goals

Although the final goal is to create a power bi dashboard that we are able to monitor, our goals is to 1. Create the necessary tables that track the relevant metadata about our current data 2. Automate the process so it runs in a timely manner

Resources

AWS Redshift; AWS Glue, Airflow, Python, SQL

Why Hedgehogs?

Because we like them.

---

SUSE AI Meets the Game Board by moio

Use tabletopgames.ai’s open source TAG and PyTAG frameworks to apply Statistical Forward Planning and Deep Reinforcement Learning to two board games of our own design. On an all-green, all-open source, all-AWS stack!

---

AI + Board Games

Board games have long been fertile ground for AI innovation, pushing the boundaries of capabilities such as strategy, adaptability, and real-time decision-making - from Deep Blue's chess mastery to AlphaZero’s domination of Go. Games aren’t just fun: they’re complex, dynamic problems that often mirror real-world challenges, making them interesting from an engineering perspective.

As avid board gamers, aspiring board game designers, and engineers with careers in open source infrastructure, we’re excited to dive into the latest AI techniques first-hand.

Our goal is to develop an all-open-source, all-green AWS-based stack powered by some serious hardware to drive our board game experiments forward!

---

Project Goals

1. Set Up the Stack:

   • Install and configure the TAG and PyTAG frameworks on SUSE Linux Enterprise Base Container Images.
   • Integrate with the SUSE AI stack for GPU-accelerated training on AWS.
   • Validate a sample GPU-accelerated PyTAG workload on SUSE AI.
   • Ensure the setup is entirely repeatable with Terraform and configuration scripts, documenting results along the way.

2. Design and Implement AI Agents:

   • Develop AI agents for the two board games, incorporating Statistical Forward Planning and Deep Reinforcement Learning techniques.
   • Fine-tune model parameters to optimize game-playing performance.
   • Document the advantages and limitations of each technique.

3. Test, Analyze, and Refine:

   • Conduct AI vs. AI and AI vs. human matches to evaluate agent strategies and performance.
   • Record insights, document learning outcomes, and refine models based on real-world gameplay.

---

Technical Stack

• Frameworks: TAG and PyTAG for AI agent development
• Platform: SUSE AI
• Tools: AWS for high-performance GPU acceleration

---

Why This Project Matters

This project not only deepens our understanding of AI techniques by doing but also showcases the power and flexibility of SUSE’s open-source infrastructure for supporting high-level AI projects. By building on an all-open-source stack, we aim to create a pathway for other developers and AI enthusiasts to explore, experiment, and deploy their own innovative projects within the open-source space.

---

Our Motivation

We believe hands-on experimentation is the best teacher.

Combining our engineering backgrounds with our passion for board games, we’ll explore AI in a way that’s both challenging and creatively rewarding. Our ultimate goal? To hack an AI agent that’s as strategic and adaptable as a real human opponent (if not better!) — and to leverage it to design even better games... for humans to play!

---