There is a tool called caff, which is the de-facto standard when dealing with keysigning (on a large scale, e.g. after a key signing party). This tool hasn't been touch in years, is written and configured in Perl (hence cannot be read and/or maintained :smile:) and is not easy to package, because of a lot of dependencies, etc. It is not even available in our default repositories (at least for Tumbleweed). In general there seems to be a certain kind of frustration with this software, but there is no real alternative available yet.
Ideally the new toolset should allow to organize a complete keysigning party, e.g. it should assist the organizer with:
- Collecting all the keys before the keysigning party (e.g. automatically via mail and/or a dedicated OpenPGP keyserver) or by adding them manually (e.g. import the key itself or the key ID)
- Prepare a keyring/printout containing all of the keys previously collected and make it available to all participants (via mail, via keyserver, by copying it to a HTTP server, or possibly by hosting it over HTTP for ourselves, etc.)
For the actual participants of a keysigning party there should be a set of tools to allow for the following:
- Optional: Import the keyring published by the organizer
- Iterate through all of the keys (either from previously imported keyring or specified by the user):
- Retrieve the key information from a keyserver, if necessary
- Display the required information (fingerprint, name, UIDs, etc.)
- Ask the user for confirmation
- Actually sign the key
- For each UID that contains a mail address, the following should be done:
- Strip the UID from the rest of the key
- Send the receiver his signed key via mail, which makes sure he is (and/or at least was at some point in time) in control over the specified mail address
- Optional: Upload the key to a keyserver (when the mail loop is not wanted, etc.)
Another set of scripts/tools that might be useful for the organizer of a keysigning party, might allow for visualization of the web of trust before and after the event takes place. For instance the tool could generate a graph on the keyring published before the keysigning party. The resulting image file can be published. After the event has taken place and all of the participants had enough time to sign their keys (e.g. two weeks after the event), you could re-issue the command and publish the new graph. Ideally, the web of trust should be way better than beforehand.
All of this should be configurable via configuration files and command line options. It should be something easy to understand and flexible to use (e.g. YAML). You should not require any knowledge about the programming language that is used (which is the case with caff, since it uses Perl for its configuration file).
While I'm open to discussion about the programming language and tools being used, I'm planning to work on this in Go. I don't have a lot of experience with it yet, and hope to improve my skills with this project. Support for most of the requirements is already available, in particular:
- OpenPGP for actual cryptographic operations: https://godoc.org/golang.org/x/crypto/openpgp
- SMTP for sending mail(s): https://golang.org/pkg/net/smtp/
- Hosting and retrieving content via HTTP: https://golang.org/pkg/net/http/
No Hackers yet
Looking for hackers with the skills:
This project is part of:
Hack Week 17
Activity
Comments
Similar Projects
Add support for todo.sr.ht to git-bug by mcepl
Description
I am a big fan of distributed issue tracking and the best (and possibly) only credible such issue tracker is now git-bug. It has bridges to another centralized issue trackers, so user can download (and modify) issues on GitHub, GitLab, Launchpad, Jira). I am also a fan of SourceHut, which has its own issue tracker, so I would like it bridge the two. Alas, I don’t know much about Go programming language (which the git-bug is written) and absolutely nothing about GraphQL (which todo.sr.ht uses for communication). AI to the rescue. I would like to vibe code (and eventually debug and make functional) bridge to the SourceHut issue tracker.
Goals
Functional fix for https://github.com/git-bug/git-bug/issues/1024
Resources
- anybody how actually understands how GraphQL and authentication on SourceHut (OAuth2) works
HTTP API for nftables by crameleon
Background
The idea originated in https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/164060 and is about building RESTful API which translates authorized HTTP requests to operations in nftables, possibly utilizing libnftables-json(5).
Originally, I started developing such an interface in Go, utilizing https://github.com/google/nftables. The conversion of string networks to nftables set elements was problematic (unfortunately no record of details), and I started a second attempt in Python, which made interaction much simpler thanks to native nftables Python bindings.
Goals
- Find and track the issue with google/nftables
- Revisit and polish the Go or Python code (prefer Go, but possibly depends on implementing missing functionality), primarily the server component
- Finish functionality to interact with nftables sets (retrieving and updating elements), which are of interest for the originating issue
- Align test suite
- Packaging
Resources
- https://git.netfilter.org/nftables/tree/py/src/nftables.py
- https://git.com.de/Georg/nftables-http-api (to be moved to GitHub)
- https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:crameleon:containers/pytest-nftables-container
Results
- Started new https://github.com/tacerus/nftables-http-api.
- First Go nftables issue was related to set elements needing to be added with different start and end addresses - coincidentally, this was recently discovered by someone else, who added a useful helper function for this: https://github.com/google/nftables/pull/342.
- Further improvements submitted: https://github.com/google/nftables/pull/347.
Side results
Upon starting to unify the structure and implementing more functionality, missing JSON output support was noticed for some subcommands in libnftables. Submitted patches here as well:
- https://lore.kernel.org/netfilter-devel/20251203131736.4036382-2-georg@syscid.com/T/#u
Contribute to terraform-provider-libvirt by pinvernizzi
Description
The SUSE Manager (SUMA) teams' main tool for infrastructure automation, Sumaform, largely relies on terraform-provider-libvirt. That provider is also widely used by other teams, both inside and outside SUSE.
It would be good to help the maintainers of this project and give back to the community around it, after all the amazing work that has been already done.
If you're interested in any of infrastructure automation, Terraform, virtualization, tooling development, Go (...) it is also a good chance to learn a bit about them all by putting your hands on an interesting, real-use-case and complex project.
Goals
- Get more familiar with Terraform provider development and libvirt bindings in Go
- Solve some issues and/or implement some features
- Get in touch with the community around the project
Resources
- CONTRIBUTING readme
- Go libvirt library in use by the project
- Terraform plugin development
- "Good first issue" list
Cluster API Provider for Harvester by rcase
Project Description
The Cluster API "infrastructure provider" for Harvester, also named CAPHV, makes it possible to use Harvester with Cluster API. This enables people and organisations to create Kubernetes clusters running on VMs created by Harvester using a declarative spec.
The project has been bootstrapped in HackWeek 23, and its code is available here.
Work done in HackWeek 2023
- Have a early working version of the provider available on Rancher Sandbox : *DONE *
- Demonstrated the created cluster can be imported using Rancher Turtles: DONE
- Stretch goal - demonstrate using the new provider with CAPRKE2: DONE and the templates are available on the repo
DONE in HackWeek 24:
- Add more Unit Tests
- Improve Status Conditions for some phases
- Add cloud provider config generation
- Testing with Harvester v1.3.2
- Template improvements
- Issues creation
DONE in 2025 (out of Hackweek)
- Support of ClusterClass
- Add to
clusterctlcommunity providers, you can add it directly withclusterctl - Testing on newer versions of Harvester v1.4.X and v1.5.X
- Support for
clusterctl generate cluster ... - Improve Status Conditions to reflect current state of Infrastructure
- Improve CI (some bugs for release creation)
Goals for HackWeek 2025
- FIRST and FOREMOST, any topic is important to you
- Add e2e testing
- Certify the provider for Rancher Turtles
- Add Machine pool labeling
- Add PCI-e passthrough capabilities.
- Other improvement suggestions are welcome!
Thanks to @isim and Dominic Giebert for their contributions!
Resources
Looking for help from anyone interested in Cluster API (CAPI) or who wants to learn more about Harvester.
This will be an infrastructure provider for Cluster API. Some background reading for the CAPI aspect:
Rewrite Distrobox in go (POC) by fabriziosestito
Description
Rewriting Distrobox in Go.
Main benefits:
- Easier to maintain and to test
- Adapter pattern for different container backends (LXC, systemd-nspawn, etc.)
Goals
- Build a minimal starting point with core commands
- Keep the CLI interface compatible: existing users shouldn't notice any difference
- Use a clean Go architecture with adapters for different container backends
- Keep dependencies minimal and binary size small
- Benchmark against the original shell script
Resources
- Upstream project: https://github.com/89luca89/distrobox/
- Distrobox site: https://distrobox.it/
- ArchWiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Distrobox
Advent of Code: The Diaries by amanzini
Description
It was the Night Before Compile Time ...
Hackweek 25 (December 1-5) perfectly coincides with the first five days of Advent of Code 2025. This project will leverage this overlap to participate in the event in real-time.
To add a layer of challenge and exploration (in the true spirit of Hackweek), the puzzles will be solved using a non-mainstream, modern language like Ruby, D, Crystal, Gleam or Zig.
The primary project intent is not just simply to solve the puzzles, but to exercise result sharing and documentation. I'd create a public-facing repository documenting the process. This involves treating each day's puzzle as a mini-project: solving it, then documenting the solution with detailed write-ups, analysis of the language's performance and ergonomics, and visualizations.
|
\ ' /
-- (*) --
>*<
>0<@<
>>>@<<*
>@>*<0<<<
>*>>@<<<@<<
>@>>0<<<*<<@<
>*>>0<<@<<<@<<<
>@>>*<<@<>*<<0<*<
\*/ >0>>*<<@<>0><<*<@<<
___\\U//___ >*>>@><0<<*>>@><*<0<<
|\\ | | \\| >@>>0<*<0>>@<<0<<<*<@<<
| \\| | _(UU)_ >((*))_>0><*<0><@<<<0<*<
|\ \| || / //||.*.*.*.|>>@<<*<<@>><0<<<
|\\_|_|&&_// ||*.*.*.*|_\\db//_
""""|'.'.'.|~~|.*.*.*| ____|_
|'.'.'.| ^^^^^^|____|>>>>>>|
~~~~~~~~ '""""`------'
------------------------------------------------
This ASCII pic can be found at
https://asciiart.website/art/1831
Goals
Code, Docs, and Memes: An AoC Story
Have fun!
Involve more people, play together
Solve Days 1-5: Successfully solve both parts of the Advent of Code 2025 puzzles for Days 1-5 using the chosen non-mainstream language.
Daily Documentation & Language Review: Publish a detailed write-up for each day. This documentation will include the solution analysis, the chosen algorithm, and specific commentary on the language's ergonomics, performance, and standard library for the given task.