Project Description

I run openSUSE TW and FF with i7-5600U Intel CPU. Calls with ~4 (video) participants work but my CPU load is approaching number of cores. In slightly bigger calls (>=6 participants) the CPU load was insufficient and audio packets were being dropped. I'd like learn more about webrtc video streams in order to reduce the client's CPU work or make it more adaptive when running with limited resources.

Goal for this Hackweek

  • Prepare a testbench for stressing a client (likely bunch of extrinsic VMs with v4l2loopback).
  • Learn about webrtc and browser API wrt video.
  • Profile CPU work -- where the time is spent.
  • (Reduction: reap any low-hanging fruits discovered in the profile.)
  • (Adaptibility: figure out to how to recognize tight-CPU situations in the client and ensure audio QoS.)

Resources

Looking for hackers with the skills:

webrtc jitsi video codecs gpu

This project is part of:

Hack Week 20

Activity

  • almost 3 years ago: pvorel liked this project.
  • about 3 years ago: toe liked this project.
  • about 3 years ago: fos liked this project.
  • about 3 years ago: dgedon liked this project.
  • about 3 years ago: dfaggioli liked this project.
  • about 3 years ago: mkoutny started this project.
  • about 3 years ago: mkoutny added keyword "webrtc" to this project.
  • about 3 years ago: mkoutny added keyword "jitsi" to this project.
  • about 3 years ago: mkoutny added keyword "video" to this project.
  • about 3 years ago: mkoutny added keyword "codecs" to this project.
  • about 3 years ago: mkoutny added keyword "gpu" to this project.
  • about 3 years ago: mkoutny originated this project.

  • Comments

    • mkoutny
      almost 3 years ago by mkoutny | Reply

      • I used built-in support in FF with media.navigator.streams.fake + Selenium to realize test callers
      • Quite an exhaustive blog on webrtc, the codec benchmarking in browser (alas worked in Chromium only, not FF)
        • webrtc abstracts away many fine-tunings from the JS code, the parts that allow some tuning aren't standardized and each browser implements it differently
      • FF has built-in JS profiler (measures real-time, not CPU time), I used perf for cpu time debugging
        • (surprisingly), remarkable amount of CPU work is spent in (local) audio processing -- might be possible to reduce (in FF codebase), that's where I stopped
        • video (decoding) didn't seem to be an issue in my measurements but it may be caused by synthetic video streams that didn't stress the decoder
      • I didn't got down to the adaptibility issue
      • code and private notes

    • mkoutny
      almost 3 years ago by mkoutny | Reply

      I've continued analyzing the excessive audio cpu consumption and filed a FF bug (TL;DR it's tackled in upstream libwebrtc but FF "vendors" a stale version.)

      Ad the audio QoS, the audio threads apparently run with SCHED_RR (therefore my attempts to reproduce tight CPU situations with cpu controller won't be realistic (only SCHED_NORMAL are throttled)). However, it seems the crackling noise isn't directly caused by low cpu bandwidth but: a) scheduling latency dispersion, b) receive threads (no RT priority) lagging behind.

    Similar Projects

    Open Source ONVIF Camera Implementation by nbelouin

    [comment]: # (Please use the project descriptio...


    A frameblending filter for OBS Studio well-suited to do game streaming by mschreiner

    Project Description

    To experiment and pos...


    Package MONAI Machine Learning Models for Medical Applications by jordimassaguerpla

    Project Description

    MONAI Deploy aims to ...


    COOTWbot by ngetahun

    [comment]: # (Please use the project descriptio...