zypper-docker with multiple backends and an API
a project by mssola
Updated almost 6 years ago. 3 hacker ♥️.

During the last CSM workshop I started to refactor zypper-docker in a way that:

  • The CLI code and the "library" part got split.
  • I started to abstract zypper-specific commands.
  • I started a PoC "serve" command which allows zypper-docker to run as a server.

My main goal is to continue on this effort by following these steps (in no specific order):

  • Add another distro into the mix (Debian and Fedora come to my mind).
  • Implement the "serve" command (I'll probably write a spec before starting the hackweek).
  • Test: some existing tests have to be re-adapted or moved. I'll also add more tests.

I don't honestly expect to have everything implemented without any rough edges, it will probably be incomplete or lacking in some regard, but this can be polished over time. The main goal of this hackweek is to at least have the previous three points in a "good-enough" shape.

Join this project

Looking for hackers with the skills:

docker zypper security

This project is part of:

Hack Week 14

Activity

  • over 8 years ago: tdig liked this project.
  • almost 9 years ago: evshmarnev liked this project.
  • almost 9 years ago: mssola liked this project.
  • almost 9 years ago: mssola started this project.
  • almost 9 years ago: mssola added keyword "docker" to this project.
  • almost 9 years ago: mssola added keyword "zypper" to this project.
  • almost 9 years ago: mssola added keyword "security" to this project.
  • almost 9 years ago: mssola originated this project.


    • Comments

    Be the first to comment!

    Similar Projects

    Migrate from Docker to Podman by tjyrinki_suse

    Description

    I'd like to continue my former work on containerization of several domains on a single server by changing from Docker containers to Podman containers. That will need an OS upgrade as well as Podman is not available in that old server version.

    Goals

    • Update OS.
    • Migrate from Docker to Podman.
    • Keep everything functional, including the existing "meanwhile done" additional Docker container that is actually being used already.
    • Keep everything at least as secure as currently. One of the reasons of having the containers is to isolate risks related to services open to public Internet.
    • Try to enable the Podman use in production.
    • At minimum, learn about all of these topics.
    • Optionally, improve Ansible side of things as well...

    Resources

    A search engine is one's friend. Migrating from Docker to Podman, and from docker-compose to podman-compose.

    Ansible for add-on management by lmanfredi

    Description

    Machines can contains various combinations of add-ons and are often modified during the time.

    The list of repos can change so I would like to create an automation able to reset the status to a given state, based on metadata available for these machines

    Goals

    Create an Ansible automation able to take care of add-on (repo list) configuration using metadata as reference

    Resources

    Results

    Created WIP project Ansible-add-on-openSUSE

    "autoremove" functionality for zypper by e_bischoff

    The purpose would be to have the equivalent of Ubuntu's "apt-get autoremove" functionality.

    When you install package P, it might draw in dependancies D1, D2, ... Dn automatically.

    When you later uninstall P, the dependancies D1, D2, ..., Dn might remain on your system.

    If you keep installing and uninstalling packages, after a while your system remains cluttered with things you don't need.

    The idea would be to mark all dependancies that were installed but not explicitely requested as "installed automatically". Then a command like "zypper autoremove" could remove them at once if they are not needed anymore.

    Approaches seen online

    After scouring forms for solutions these are some alias's used to replicate the functionality

    1. zypper packages --unneeded | awk -F'|' 'NR==0 || NR==1 || NR==2 || NR==3 || NR==4 {next} {print $3}' | grep -v Name | sudo xargs zypper remove --clean-deps

    2. This one is a script and has bashisms bash mapfile -t unneeded < <(zypper --quiet pa --unneeded | awk '$1 == "i" { print $5, "-", $7 }') (( ${#unneeded@]} )) && sudo zypper --quiet rm --clean-deps --details "${unneeded@]}"

    3. sudo zypper rm $(zypper pa --unneeded | awk '/i / {print $3}' FS='|' | uniq | tr -d ' ')

    Based on testing zypper packages --orphaned provides packages that are not in any repo, even if a user has explicitly installed them, so --orphaned may not be the way to go, instead focusing on --unneeded

    Contributing to Linux Kernel security by pperego

    Description

    A couple of weeks ago, I found this blog post by Gustavo Silva, a Linux Kernel contributor.

    I always strived to start again into hacking the Linux Kernel, so I asked Coverity scan dashboard access and I want to contribute to Linux Kernel by fixing some minor issues.

    I want also to create a Linux Kernel fuzzing lab using qemu and syzkaller

    Goals

    1. Fix at least 2 security bugs
    2. Create the fuzzing lab and having it running

    The story so far

    • Day 1: setting up a virtual machine for kernel development using Tumbleweed. Reading a lot of documentation, taking confidence with Coverity dashboard and with procedures to submit a kernel patch
    • Day 2: I read really a lot of documentation and I triaged some findings on Coverity SAST dashboard. I have to confirm that SAST tool are great false positives generator, even for low hanging fruits.
    • Day 3: Working on trivial changes after I read this blog post: https://www.toblux.com/posts/2024/02/linux-kernel-patches.html. I have to take confidence with the patch preparation and submit process yet.
      • First trivial patch sent: using strtruefalse() macro instead of hard-coded strings in a staging driver for a lcd display
      • Fix for a dereference before null check issue discovered by Coverity (CID 1601566) https://scan7.scan.coverity.com/#/project-view/52110/11354?selectedIssue=1601566
    • Day 4: Triaging more issues found by Coverity.
      • The patch for CID 1601566 was refused. The check against the NULL pointer was pointless so I prepared a version 2 of the patch removing the check.
      • Fixed another dereference before NULL check in iwlmvmparsewowlaninfo_notif() routine (CID 1601547). This one was already submitted by another kernel hacker :(
    • Day 5: Wrapping up. I had to do some minor rework on patch for CID 1601566. I found a stalker bothering me in private emails and people I interacted with me, advised he is a well known bothering person. Markus Elfring for the record.

    • Wrapping up: being back doing kernel hacking is amazing and I don't want to stop it. My battery pack is completely drained but changing the scope gave me a great twist and I really want to feel this energy not doing a single task for months.

      I failed in setting up a fuzzing lab but I was too optimistic for the patch submission process.

    The patches

    1

    OIDC Loginproxy by toe

    Description

    Reverse proxies can be a useful option to separate authentication logic from application logic. SUSE and openSUSE use "loginproxies" as an authentication layer in front of several services.

    Currently, loginproxies exist which support LDAP authentication or SAML authentication.

    Goals

    The goal of this Hack Week project is, to create another loginproxy which supports OpenID Connect authentication which can then act as a drop-in replacement for the existing LDAP or SAML loginproxies.

    Testing is intended to focus on the integration with OIDC IDPs from Okta, KanIDM and Authentik.

    Resources

    Model checking the BPF verifier by shunghsiyu

    Project Description

    BPF verifier plays a crucial role in securing the system (though less so now that unprivileged BPF is disabled by default in both upstream and SLES), and bugs in the verifier has lead to privilege escalation vulnerabilities in the past (e.g. CVE-2021-3490).

    One way to check whether the verifer has bugs to use model checking (a formal verification technique), in other words, build a abstract model of how the verifier operates, and then see if certain condition can occur (e.g. incorrect calculation during value tracking of registers) by giving both the model and condition to a solver.

    For the solver I will be using the Z3 SMT solver to do the checking since it provide a Python binding that's relatively easy to use.

    Goal for this Hackweek

    Learn how to use the Z3 Python binding (i.e. Z3Py) to build a model of (part of) the BPF verifier, probably the part that's related to value tracking using tristate numbers (aka tnum), and then check that the algorithm work as intended.

    Resources

    Migrate from Docker to Podman by tjyrinki_suse

    Description

    I'd like to continue my former work on containerization of several domains on a single server by changing from Docker containers to Podman containers. That will need an OS upgrade as well as Podman is not available in that old server version.

    Goals

    • Update OS.
    • Migrate from Docker to Podman.
    • Keep everything functional, including the existing "meanwhile done" additional Docker container that is actually being used already.
    • Keep everything at least as secure as currently. One of the reasons of having the containers is to isolate risks related to services open to public Internet.
    • Try to enable the Podman use in production.
    • At minimum, learn about all of these topics.
    • Optionally, improve Ansible side of things as well...

    Resources

    A search engine is one's friend. Migrating from Docker to Podman, and from docker-compose to podman-compose.

    VulnHeap by r1chard-lyu

    Description

    The VulnHeap project is dedicated to the in-depth analysis and exploitation of vulnerabilities within heap memory management. It focuses on understanding the intricate workflow of heap allocation, chunk structures, and bin management, which are essential to identifying and mitigating security risks.

    Goals

    • Familiarize with heap
      • Heap workflow
      • Chunk and bin structure
      • Vulnerabilities
    • Vulnerability
      • Use after free (UAF)
      • Heap overflow
      • Double free
    • Use Docker to create a vulnerable environment and apply techniques to exploit it

    Resources

    • https://heap-exploitation.dhavalkapil.com/divingintoglibc_heap
    • https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cloudburst/libheap/master/heap.png
    • https://github.com/shellphish/how2heap?tab=readme-ov-file