Create Test Framework for XSLT Stylesheets
an idea by thomas-schraitle
Updated almost 4 years ago. 1 hackers ♥️. Has no hacker: grab it!

Testing stylesheets can be a difficult task. Find a way to create a test suite for the DocBook stylesheets, for example.

No Hackers yet

Join this project

Looking for hackers with the skills:

testing xslt

This project is part of:

Hack Week 11

Activity

  • about 11 years ago: e_bischoff liked this project.
  • about 11 years ago: thomas-schraitle added keyword "testing" to this project.
  • about 11 years ago: thomas-schraitle added keyword "xslt" to this project.
  • about 11 years ago: thomas-schraitle originated this project.


    • Comments

    • e_bischoff
      about 11 years ago by e_bischoff | Reply

      That's challenging.

      Would the test framework be limited to XML output? In that case, a first test would be that the result is well-formed and validates. Of course, that would not mean that it matches expectations.

      More generally, XSLT can produce about anything. What could be checked?

      • thomas-schraitle
        about 11 years ago by thomas-schraitle | Reply

        Thanks Eric for your comment! :)

        Well, actually there is already a test environment called XSpec. However, it works for XSLT 2 only, so it could be an issue for XSLT 1 stylesheets (especially when using extensions and the like).

        In my case, I'm searching for a solution for the DocBook stylesheets. They produce specific results and I'm only interested if some specific structure has been created. This can be easily checked through XPath.

        I tried XSpec, but documentation is a bit limited. Plus, it doesn't work as I expected to it. ;) So I guess, it will be some kind of Python3 + pytest magic. We'll see. :)

    Similar Projects

    Testing and adding GNU/Linux distributions on Uyuni by juliogonzalezgil

    Join the Gitter channel! https://gitter.im/uyuni-project/hackweek

    Uyuni is a configuration and infrastructure management tool that saves you time and headaches when you have to manage and update tens, hundreds or even thousands of machines. It also manages configuration, can run audits, build image containers, monitor and much more!

    Currently there are a few distributions that are completely untested on Uyuni or SUSE Manager (AFAIK) or just not tested since a long time, and could be interesting knowing how hard would be working with them and, if possible, fix whatever is broken.

    For newcomers, the easiest distributions are those based on DEB or RPM packages. Distributions with other package formats are doable, but will require adapting the Python and Java code to be able to sync and analyze such packages (and if salt does not support those packages, it will need changes as well). So if you want a distribution with other packages, make sure you are comfortable handling such changes.

    No developer experience? No worries! We had non-developers contributors in the past, and we are ready to help as long as you are willing to learn. If you don't want to code at all, you can also help us preparing the documentation after someone else has the initial code ready, or you could also help with testing :-)

    The idea is testing Salt (including bootstrapping with bootstrap script) and Salt-ssh clients

    To consider that a distribution has basic support, we should cover at least (points 3-6 are to be tested for both salt minions and salt ssh minions):

    1. Reposync (this will require using spacewalk-common-channels and adding channels to the .ini file)
    2. Onboarding (salt minion from UI, salt minion from bootstrap scritp, and salt-ssh minion) (this will probably require adding OS to the bootstrap repository creator)
    3. Package management (install, remove, update...)
    4. Patching
    5. Applying any basic salt state (including a formula)
    6. Salt remote commands
    7. Bonus point: Java part for product identification, and monitoring enablement
    8. Bonus point: sumaform enablement (https://github.com/uyuni-project/sumaform)
    9. Bonus point: Documentation (https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni-docs)
    10. Bonus point: testsuite enablement (https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/tree/master/testsuite)

    If something is breaking: we can try to fix it, but the main idea is research how supported it is right now. Beyond that it's up to each project member how much to hack :-)

    • If you don't have knowledge about some of the steps: ask the team
    • If you still don't know what to do: switch to another distribution and keep testing.

    This card is for EVERYONE, not just developers. Seriously! We had people from other teams helping that were not developers, and added support for Debian and new SUSE Linux Enterprise and openSUSE Leap versions :-)

    In progress/done for Hack Week 25

    Guide

    We started writin a Guide: Adding a new client GNU Linux distribution to Uyuni at https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/wiki/Guide:-Adding-a-new-client-GNU-Linux-distribution-to-Uyuni, to make things easier for everyone, specially those not too familiar wht Uyuni or not technical.

    openSUSE Leap 16.0

    The distribution will all love!

    https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Roadmap#DRAFTScheduleforLeap16.0

    Curent Status We started last year, it's complete now for Hack Week 25! :-D

    • [W] Reposync (this will require using spacewalk-common-channels and adding channels to the .ini file) NOTE: Done, client tools for SLMicro6 are using as those for SLE16.0/openSUSE Leap 16.0 are not available yet
    • [W] Onboarding (salt minion from UI, salt minion from bootstrap scritp, and salt-ssh minion) (this will probably require adding OS to the bootstrap repository creator)
    • [W] Package management (install, remove, update...). Works, even reboot requirement detection

    openQA tests needles elaboration using AI image recognition by mdati

    Description

    In the openQA test framework, to identify the status of a target SUT image, a screenshots of GUI or CLI-terminal images, the needles framework scans the many pictures in its repository, having associated a given set of tags (strings), selecting specific smaller parts of each available image. For the needles management actually we need to keep stored many screenshots, variants of GUI and CLI-terminal images, eachone accompanied by a dedicated set of data references (json).

    A smarter framework, using image recognition based on AI or other image elaborations tools, nowadays widely available, could improve the matching process and hopefully reduce time and errors, during the images verification and detection process.

    Goals

    Main scope of this idea is to match a "graphical" image of the console or GUI status of a running openQA test, an image of a shell console or application-GUI screenshot, using less time and resources and with less errors in data preparation and use, than the actual openQA needles framework; that is:

    • having a given SUT (system under test) GUI or CLI-terminal screenshot, with a local distribution of pixels or text commands related to a running test status,
    • we want to identify a desired target, e.g. a screen image status or data/commands context,
      • based on AI/ML-pretrained archives containing object or other proper elaboration tools,
      • possibly able to identify also object not present in the archive, i.e. by means of AI/ML mechanisms.
    • the matching result should be then adapted to continue working in the openQA test, likewise and in place of the same result that would have been produced by the original openQA needles framework.
    • We expect an improvement of the matching-time(less time), reliability of the expected result(less error) and simplification of archive maintenance in adding/removing objects(smaller DB and less actions).

    Hackweek POC:

    Main steps

    • Phase 1 - Plan
      • study the available tools
      • prepare a plan for the process to build
    • Phase 2 - Implement
      • write and build a draft application
    • Phase 3 - Data
      • prepare the data archive from a subset of needles
      • initialize/pre-train the base archive
      • select a screenshot from the subset, removing/changing some part
    • Phase 4 - Test
      • run the POC application
      • expect the image type is identified in a good %.

    Resources

    First step of this project is quite identification of useful resources for the scope; some possibilities are:

    • SUSE AI and other ML tools (i.e. Tensorflow)
    • Tools able to manage images
    • RPA test tools (like i.e. Robot framework)
    • other.

    Project references

    Multimachine on-prem test with opentofu, ansible and Robot Framework by apappas

    Description

    A long time ago I explored using the Robot Framework for testing. A big deficiency over our openQA setup is that bringing up and configuring the connection to a test machine is out of scope.

    Nowadays we have a way¹ to deploy SUTs outside openqa, but we only use if for cloud tests in conjuction with openqa. Using knowledge gained from that project I am going to try to create a test scenario that replicates an openqa test but this time including the deployment and setup of the SUT.

    Goals

    Create a simple multimachine test scenario with the support server and SUT all created by the robot framework.

    Resources

    1. https://github.com/SUSE/qe-sap-deployment
    2. terraform-libvirt-provider